School leaders face challenges in using technology to upgrade teaching and learning processes in the twenty-first century as they must also become role models in its usage. Thus technology must be used not only for teaching and learning processes, but also in their organisational management. The aim of this research is first, to identify the level of technology leadership and competency in curriculum activity management among secondary school principals in Malaysia; second, to determine if technology leadership practices and curriculum activity management differ based on school location; third, to analyse if there is a correlation between technology leadership and competency of curriculum activity management. This quantitative style research used questionnaire for data collection involving 341 randomly selected Malaysian principals. Data collected was then analysed using descriptive and inference analysis. Findings show that Malaysian principals practice technology leadership at a very high level, and are also very competent at managing curriculum activity. T-test analysis found that urban principals’ technology leadership practices are significantly higher than their rural counterparts, but their curriculum management competencies are at the same level. Findings also show that there is a low yet significant correlation between technology leadership and curriculum management competencies. In light of this information, we recommend further in-depth studies to explore the rural-urban gap technology leadership scenario, thus finding possible solutions in narrowing the academic achieve- ment gap between rural and urban schools.
Alias, B. S. (2009). Analysis of Competencies Based on Personal Qualities, Knowledge, Skills, and Practices in Various Areas of Management among the Principals in Malaysia. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Bangi: National University of Malaysia.
Anderson, R. E., & Dexter, S. (2005). School Technology Leadership: An Empirical Investigation of Prevalence and Effect. Educational Administration Quarterly Journal, 40, 49-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013161X04269517
Beatriz, P., Deborah, N., & Hunter, M. (2008). Improving School Leadership Activity (Vol. 1). OECD: Policy and Practice.
Best, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (2006). Research in Education (10th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
Brockmeier, L. L., Sermon, J. M., & Hope, W. C. (2005). Principals’ Relationship with Computer Technology. National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 89, 45-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019263650508964305
Cavana, R., Delahaye, B., & Sekaran, U. (2001). Applied Business Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Methods (3rd ed.). Australia: John Wiley & Sons.
Chen, L. L. (2004). Pedagogical Strategies to Increase Pre-Service Teachers’ Confidence in Computer Learning. Educational Technology & Society, 7, 50-60.
Chua, Y. P. (2006). Methods and Statistics Research: Book 1 Research Methods. Kuala Lumpur: McGraw Hill.
Creighton, T. (2003). The Principal as Technology Leader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
Dharma, S. (2008). The School Principal Is Incompetent in Indonesia. Retrieved from Harian Kompas.com.,11 Ogos 2008.
Dikkers, A. G., Hughes, J. E., & McLeod, S. (2005). A Bridge to Success. School Technology Leadership Initiative. T.H.E. Journal, 32, 20-24.
Flanagan, L., & Jacobsen, M. (2003). Technology Leadership for Twenty-First Century Principal. Journal of Educational Administration, 41, 124-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09578230310464648
Fletcher, G. H. (2009). A Matter of Principals. T.H.E. Journal, 36, 22-28.
Gay, L. R., & Airasian, P. (2003). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application (7th ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Gerard, L. F., Bowyer, J. B., & Linn, M. C. (2008). Principal Leadership for Technology-Enhanced Learning in Science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17, 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10956-007-9070-6
Hallinger, P. (2008). Methodologies for Studying School Lead-ership: A Review of 25 Years of Research Using the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, 24-28 March 2008, Version 4.7.
Hoque, K. E., Razak, A. Z. A., & Zohora, M. F. (2012). ICT Utilization among School Teachers and Principals in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 1, 17-34.
Imam, S. S. J. S. (2012). Professional Training and Its Relationship to Treat Personality, Management Skills and Leadership among Principals Novice in Malaysia. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Bangi: The National University of Malaysia.
Inspectorate and Quality Assurance (2010). Malaysia Education Quality Standard 2010. Putrajaya: Ministry of Education.
Institute Aminuddin Baki (2006). Malaysian School Principals’ Competency Standards (MSCPS). Putrajaya: MOE.
Institute Aminuddin Baki (2010). IAB Moving forward. Putrajaya: MOE.
Institute Aminuddin Baki (2013). ICT Competence of Principal. Putrajaya: MOE.
Interstate School Leadership Licensure Consortium (2008). Educational Leadership Policy Standards. Washington DC: The National Policy Board for Educational Administration.
ISTE (2002). National Educational Technology Standards for Administrators. http://cnets.iste.org/administrators/
ISTE (2007). Educational Technology Standard and Performance Indicators for Administrators.
NETS-A (2009). NETS for Administrators 2009. http://www.iste.org/standards/iste-standards/standards-for-administrators
Jackson, S. L. (2006). Research Methods and Statistic: A Critical Thinking Approach (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson and Wadsworth.
Johar, M. (2011). Technology Leadership and ICT Competence of Teachers in Islamic Schools in Ku-ching Sarawak. Thesis Principalship, Washington DC: Institute of Educational Leadership.
Kadir, M. B. A. (2008). Effects of the Leadership and Integrity of Total Quality Management, Human Dimension of Climate Processes in the Organization MARA Institute of Higher Education. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Bangi: The National University of Malaysia.
Leithwood, K. A., & Riehl, C. (2005). What We Know about Successful School Leadership. Philadelphia, PA: Laboratory for student success, Temple University.
Malaysian Ministry of Education (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025. Putrajaya: MOE.
Mansor, A. N. (2006). Management Practices Secondary School Principals: A Case Study. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Bangi: The National University of Malaysia.
Metcalf, W. M. (2012). K-12 Principals’ Perceptions of Their Technology Leadership Preparedness. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Statesboro, GA: Georgia Southern University.
Ministry of Education Malaysia (2012). Malaysian Education Blueprint 2013-2025. Putrajaya: MOE.
Moidunny, K. (2009). The Effectiveness of the National Professional Qualification for Educational Leaders (NPQEL). Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Bangi: The National University of Malaysia.
Muda, M. (2005). Situational Leadership among School Principals in Malaysia. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Bangi: The National University of Malaysia.
Murphy, J., Elliott, S. N., Goldring, E., & Porter, A. C. (2006). Learning-Centered Leadership: A Conceptual Foundation. Nashville, TN: Learning Sciences Institute, Vanderbilt University (NJ1).
Purba, S. (2009). Increased Competence through Mentoring in Creating the Professionalism of the Head Rest Is. GenerasiKampus Jurnal, 2, 1-16.
Robertson, M., Grady, N. B., Fluck, A., & Webb, I. L. (2006). Conversations toward Effective Implementation of Information Communication Technologies in Australian Schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 44, 71-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09578230610642665
Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The Impact of Leadership on Student Outcomes: An Analysis of the Differential Effects of Leadership Types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 635-674. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321509
Slenning, K. (2000). The Future School Manager: Information and Communication Technology Aspects. Educational Media International, 37, 243-249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09523980050210439
Wang, C. H. (2010). Technology Leadership among School Principals: A Technology-Coordinator’s Perspective. Journal Asian Social Science, 6, 51-54.
Waters, T., Marzano, R. J., & McNulty, B. (2003). Balanced Leadership: What 30 Years of Research Tell Us about the Effect of Leadership on Students Achievement. A Working Paper Mid-Continent Research for Education and Learning. Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC).