Assessing the Outcome of Teacher Education Programs in Norway: An Analysis and Discussion of the Factor Structure in Domains of Teacher Practicum for Student Teachers at Three Norwegian Universities — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Assessing the Outcome of Teacher Education Programs in Norway: An Analysis and Discussion of the Factor Structure in Domains of Teacher Practicum for Student Teachers at Three Norwegian Universities
Program for Teacher Education (PLU), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
,
Program for Teacher Education (PLU), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
1 Program for Teacher Education (PLU), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
2 Program for Teacher Education (PLU), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
This article contributes to our understanding of teacher education by presenting the results of a large pilot study of quality assessments of teacher education programs at three Norwegian universities. We present an assessment instrument that corresponds to the California Standards for Teaching Professions and the practice domains developed by Darling-Hammond. The research question is: To what extent does the reported five-factor structure in the reported revised instrument (Darling-Hammond) fit the Norwegian context? We have revised this instrument to better cover both the documented dimensions of teacher professionalism and the demands regarding teacher quality in Norwegian educational policy. This has been accomplished by incorporating and modifying the items of the Darling-Hammond instrument. The modification process involved a selection of students, teachers, teacher educators and a school headmaster who discussed the relevance and content validity of the items. The final questionnaire was piloted at three Norwegian universities in three different education programs, with the participation of 419 students. The results show high inter-correlation between the original practice domains of Darling-Hammond, but the original factor structure is reproduced and to some extent supported. The results are discussed, and we conclude that the reported assessment instrument is valid as a measure of the teacher education program contributions to students’ competence in the five reported domains of the teacher practicum. Therefore, the instrument may be used as an overall evaluation of the complete program or may be slightly modified using the item format to assess distinct aspects of teacher education.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy the Exercise of Control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Blomeke, S., Buchholtz, N., Suhl, U., & Kaiser, G. (2014). Resolving the Chicken-or-Egg Causality Dilemma: The Longitudinal Interplay of Teacher Knowledge and Teacher Beliefs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 37, 130-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.10.007
Brouwer, N., & Korthagen, F. (2005). Can Teacher Education Make a Difference? American Educational Research Journal, 42, 153-224. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312042001153
Christophersen, K.-A. (2012). IBM SPSS/AMOS Databehandling og statistisk analyse [IBM SPSS/AMOS Data Processesing and Statistical Analysis]. Oslo: Akademika Forlag.
Cochran-Smith, M. (2001). Constructing Outcomes in Teacher Educaton: Policy, Practice and Pitfalls. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 9, 1-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v9n11.2001
Cochran-Smith, M., & Zeichner, K. M. (2010). Studying Teacher Education: The Report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education. Cornwall: Routledge.
Collinson, V., Tanya, C., & Sharon, F. C. (2006). Organizational Learning in Schools and School Systems: Improving Learning, Teaching, and Leading. Theory into Practice, 45, 107-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4502_2
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-Experimentation. Design & Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Boston: Hougton Mifflin Company.
Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. New York: Hartcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2006a). Assessing Teacher Education—The Usefulness of Multiple Measures for Assessing Program Outcomes. Journal of Teacher Education, 57, 120-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022487105283796
Darling-Hammond, L. (2006b). Constructing 21st-Century Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57, 300-314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022487105285962
Darling-Hammond, L., Newton, X., & Wei, R. C. (2010). Evaluating Teacher Education Outcomes: A Study of the Stanford Teacher Education Programme. Journal of Education for Teaching, 36, 369-388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2010.513844
Donaldson, G. (2014). Teacher Education and Curriculum Change in Scotland. European Journal of Education, 49, 178-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12077
DuFour, R. (2004). What Is a “Professional Learning Community”? Educational Leadership, 61, 6-11.
Engh, R., Dobson, S., & Hoihilder, E. K. (Eds.). (2007). Vurdering for Laering [Assessment for Learning]. Kristiansand: Hoiskole Forlaget.
European Commission (2013). Supporting Teacher Competence Development for Better Learning Outcomes. http://ec.europa.eu/education/policy/school/doc/teachercomp_en.pdf
Finne, H., Jensberg, H., Aaslid, B. E., Haugsbakken, H., Mathiesen, I. H., & Mordal, S. (2011). Oppfatninger av studiekvalitet i laererutdanningen blant studenter, laererutdannere, ovingslaerere og rektorer [Opinions on the Quality of Teacher Education among Student Teachers, Teacher Educators, Mentors and Head Teachers]. Trondheim: SINTEF.
Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Hoy, A. W. (2000). Collective Teacher Efficacy: Its Meaning, Measure, and Impact on Student Achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 479-507. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312037002479
Hargreaves, A. (2000). Four Ages of Professionalism and Professional Learning. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Prac- tice, 6, 151-182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713698714
Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional Capital: Transforming Teaching in Every School. London: Routledge.
Hattie, J. (2015). The Applicability of Visible Learning to Higher Education. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 1, 79-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/stl0000021
Hokka, P., & Etelapelto, A. (2014). Seeking New Perspectives on the Development of Teacher Education: A Study of the Finnish Context. Journal of Teacher Education, 65, 39-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022487113504220
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. London: Guildford Press.
Korthagen, F. (2001). Teacher Education the Problematic Enterprise. In F. Korthagen, J. Kessels, B. Koster, B. Lagerwerf, & T. Wubbels (Eds.), Linking Practice and Theory (pp. 1-19). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Korthagen, F. (2010). Situated Learning Theory and the Pedagogy of Teacher Education: Towards an Integrative View of Teacher Behavior and Teacher Learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 98-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.05.001
Korthagen, F., Loughran, J., & Russell, T. (2006). Developing Fundamental Principles for Teacher Education Programs and Practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 1020-1041. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.022
Kunnskapsdepartementet (2007). Stortingsmelding 16 (2006-2007) ...og ingen stod igjen. Tidlig innsats for livslang laering [White Paper on “… Nobody Was Left behind. Early Efforts for Life-Long Learning”]. Oslo: Statens Informasjonstj- eneste.
Kunnskapsdepartementet (2009). Stortingsmelding 11 (2008-2009): Laereren, rollen og utdanning [White Paper on “The Teacher, the Role and Education”]. Oslo: Statens Informasjonstjeneste.
Kunnskapsdepartementet (2010). Forskrift om rammeplan for grunnskolelaererutdanningene for 1.-7. trinn og 5.-10. trinn [National Regulations on Framework Plan for Primary School Teacher Education, 1st-7th Year and 5th-10th Year]. Oslo: Statens Informasjonstjeneste. http://www.regjeringen.no/no/dep/kd/id586/
Lid, S. E. (2013). PPUs relevans for undervisning i skolen. En kartlegging av studenters og nyutdannede laereres oppfatninger [Relevance of the Practical-Pedagogical Programme for Teaching in School. A Survey of Opinion among Students and Recently Graduated Teacher]. Oslo: NOKUT.
Lov om grunnskolen og den vidaregaande opplaeringa (opplaeringslova) (1998) [Act of Parliament on Primary School and Lower and Higher Secondary School (The Act on Education)].
Malinen, O.-P., Vaisanen, P., & Savolainen, H. (2012). Teacher Education in Finland: A Review of a National Effort for Preparing Teachers for the Future. The Curriculum Journal, 23, 567-584. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2012.731011
NOKUT (2006). Evaluering av allmennlaererutdanningen i Norge 2006. Del 1: Hovedrapport [An Evaluation of the Primary and Lower Secondary School Teacher Education in Norway 2006. Part 1: Main Report]. Oslo: NOKUT.
OECD (2009). Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environments: First Results from TALIS. Paris: Oganization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264068780-en
Scribner, J. P., Cockrell, K. S., Cockrell, D. H., & Valentine, J. W. (1999). Creating Professional Communities in Schools through Organizational Learning: An Evaluation of a School Improvement Process. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 130-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013161X99351007
Silins, H. C., Mulford, W. R., & Zarins, S. (2002). Organizational Learning and School Change. Educational Administration Quarterly, 38, 613-642. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013161X02239641
Simpson, B., & Marshall, N. (2010). The Mutuality of Emotions and Learning in Organizations. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19, 351-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1056492610376531
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2007). Dimensions of Teacher Self-Efficacy and Relations with Strain Factors, Perceived Collective Teacher Efficacy, and Teacher Burnout. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 611-625. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.611
Solhaug, T. (2011). New Public Management in Curriculum Reform in Norway. Policy Futures in Education, 9, 267-279. http://dx.doi.org/10.2304/pfie.2011.9.2.267
Solhaug, T., Dahl, T., & Holter, T. (2014). Rapport om evaluering av undervisningskvaliteten ved Program for laererutdanning (PLU) NTNU var 2014 [Report on the Quality of the Teacher Education Programmes at Programme for Teacher Education at NTNU]. Trondheim: Program for Laererutdanning.
Stokking, K., Leenders, F., De Jong, J., & Van Tartwijk, J. (2003). From Student to Teacher: Reducing Practice Shock and Early Dropout in the Teaching Profession. European Journal of Teacher Education, 26, 329-350. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0261976032000128175
Tirri, K., & Ubani, M. (2013). Education of Finnish Student Teachers for Purposeful Teaching. Journal of Education for Teaching, 39, 21-29.
Utdannings-og forskningsdepartementet. (2004). Stortingsmelding nr. 30 (2003-2004), Kultur for laering [White Paper on “Culture for Learning”]. Oslo: Departementenes Servicesenter, Informasjonsforvaltning.