Assessing Research and Teaching Performance in Israel’s Higher Education System: The Case Study of Ariel University
- 1 Department of behavioral sciences, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel
- 2 Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Ben Gurion University, Beer Sheva, Israel
- 3 Department of behavioral sciences, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel
Abstract
The aim of the current study is to examine research and teaching assessments in the higher education sector from a gender perspective and specifically the associations between individual attributes (gender, age, country of birth, and tenure), academic attributes (rank and faculty), and achievements in research and teaching (measured by bonuses awarded based on research excellence and student feedback surveys). The data were collected from Ariel University, where a unique system of faculty performance evaluation was in place between 2003 and 2012. The main findings of this study point to statistically significant correlations between gender and excellence in research: Female faculty members achieved slightly higher teaching scores than male faculty members while male faculty members showed superiority in research excellence scores. We also found more male faculty members in higher ranks than female faculty members. The findings of this study suggest that female faculty members may have gender-specific factors that explain their lower research achievements, such as factors related to work-family balance at fertility age.
- Council of Higher Education (2012). The Higher Education System in Israel 2012—On the Path to Growth [Hebrew]. http://che.co.il
- Gillespie, K. H., Hilsen, L. R., & Wadsworth, E. C., Professional & Organizational Development Network in Higher Education (2002). A Guide to Faculty Development: Practical Advice, Examples, and Resources. San Francisco: Anker Pub. Co.
- Hativa, N. (2013). Student Ratings of Instruction: Recognizing Effective Teaching. CreateSpace.
- Kreber, C. (Ed.) (2001). Scholarship Revisited: Perspectives on Scholarship of Teaching. New Directions for Teaching and Learning No. 86. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Manning, C. W., & Romney, L. C. (1973). Faculty Activity Analysis: Procedures Manual. Tech Report No. 44. Boulder, CL: National Center for Higher Education Management Systems at Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education.
- Sinuany-Stern, Z., & Davidovich N. (2007). The Relationship between Teaching and Research Activities of Faculty: Case Study of College of Judea and Samaria. Moscow State University Journal of Education, Pedagogical Series (2). Lomonosov: Lomonosov Publishing [Russian].
- Sinuany-Stern, Z., & Davidovitch, N. (2014). Training Teachers for Higher Education. In N. Finger (Ed.), Proceedings from ICHE: The International Conference on Higher Education (pp. 113-121). Tel Aviv: ICHE. [Hebrew].
- Wadsworth, E. C. (Ed.) (1994). To Improve the Academy: Resources for Faculty Instructional and Organizational Development. Stillwater, OK: New Forum.