The Contribution of School Climate and Teaching Quality to the Improvement of Learning Achievements, According to an External Evaluation System
- 1 Gordon College of Education, Haifa, Israel
- 2 Gordon College of Education, Haifa, Israel
Abstract
The goal of the current research is to evaluate the contribution of school climate and teaching quality to the improvement of students’ learning achievements in elementary schools and junior high schools, according to a national external evaluation system, the measurements of school efficiency and growth tests (MEITZAV). 60 schools took part in the research, including 158 5th grades and 157 8th grades. The information about their achievements was taken from the open database of the Ministry of Education. The research findings show a decline in students’ perception of the quality of teaching and school climate, the higher the students’ grade. In addition, school climate and teaching quality were found to contribute to learning achievements both in elementary school and junior high school, and that the contribution is more meaningful in math and less in Native Language discipline. The main conclusion is that it is important to allocate resources and equip the educational staff with tools in order to improve the quality of teaching and school climate, in junior high schools particularly. These findings show that additional research is necessary to allow deeper understanding of the effect of school climate and teaching quality on achievement at the single student level.
- Afari, E., Aldirge, J. M., Fraser J. B., & Swe Khine, M. (2013). Students’ Perceptions of the Learning Environment and Attitudes in Game-Based Mathematics Classrooms. Learning Environments Research, 16, 13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10984-012-9122-6
- Beller, M. (2013). Assessment in the Service of Learning: Theory and Practice. Ramat Gan: RAMA: The National Authority for Measurement & Evaluation in Education.
- Berliner, D. C. (2005). The Near Impossibility of Testing for Teacher Quality. Journal of Teacher Education, 56, 205-213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022487105275904
- Birenbaum, M., Kimron, H., & Shilton, H. (2011). Nested Contexts That Shape Assessment for Learning: School-Based Professional Learning Community and Classroom Culture. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37, 35-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.04.001
- Borman, G. D., & Kimball, S. M. (2005). Teacher Quality and Educational Equality: Do Teachers with Higher Standards- Based Evaluation Ratings Close Student Achievement Gaps? The Elementary School Journal, 106, 3-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/496904
- Darling-Hammond, L. (2004). Standards, Accountability and School Reform. Teachers College Record, 106, 1047-1085. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00372.x
- Darling-Hammond, L., & Pecheone, R. (2010). Developing an Internationally Comparable Balanced Assessment System That Supports High-Quality Learning. The National Conference on Next Generation Assessment Systems.
- Darling-Hammond, L., & Youngs, P. (2002). Defining “Highly Qualified Teachers”: What Does “Scientifically-Based Research” Actually Tell Us? Educational Researcher, 31, 13-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031009013
- Fenstermacher, G. D., & Richardson, V. (2005). On Making Determinations of Quality Teaching. Teacher College Record, 107, 186-213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.00462.x
- Fullan, M., Hill, P., & Crevola, C. (2006). Breakthrough. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
- Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. (1986). Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge in Mathematics: An Introductory Analysis. In J. Hiebert (Ed.), Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge: The Case of Mathematics (pp. 1-27). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Hosp, J. L., & Ardoin, S. P. (2008). Assessment for Instructional Planning. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 33, 69-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1534508407311428