Use of Student Response Systems for Summative Assessments
- 1 University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
Abstract
Student Response Systems (Clickers) have been adopted by a number of instructors to increase interactions, student engagement and/or formative assessment and feedback especially in large group sessions. Clickers are well known as tools for active learning strategy particularly in formative assessments. However, they are rarely used in assessments that count. With the advent of clickers with a display screen, attempts are being made to use clickers in summative exams. We examined the feasibility of their use in high stakes summative assessment by piloting such an assessment in a simulated setting. Utilizing the lessons learned in the pilot study, clickers were used in formative and summative assessments in various iterations of a computer course taught by one of the authors (CC). At the end of the course, perceptions of students on the use of clickers for high-stake examinations were obtained using an online survey. The instructor was interviewed to identify factors that facilitated clicker use and the challenges faced. In general, students were accepting of the use of this technology in high stakes exams and found it engaging and satisfying, primarily because of instant feedback. The instructor found the process less time consuming and efficient, and more secure compared to scan sheets. Clickers are best used for examinations of short duration, with multiple-choice questions or questions with minimal text or mathematical entry.
- Barber, M., & Njus, D. (2007). Clicker Evolution: Seeking Intelligent Design. CBE-Life Sciences, 6, 29-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.06-12-0206
- Bojinova, E., & Oigara, J. (2013). Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 25, 154-165.
- Carnaghan, C., Edmonds, T. P., Lechner, T. A., & Olds, P. R. (2011). Using Student Response Systems in the Accounting Classroom: Strengths, Strategies and Limitations. Journal of Accounting Education, 29, 265-283.
- Cubric, M., & Jefferies, A. (2015). The Benefits and Challenges of Large-Scale Deployment of Electronic Voting Systems: University Student Views from across Different Subject Groups. Computers & Education, 87, 98-111.
- Cummings, R. G., & Hsu, M. (2007). An Investigation in a Tax Accounting Class. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 4, 21-26.
- DeBourgh, G. A. (2008). Use of Classroom “Clickers” to Promote Acquisition of Advanced Reasoning Skills. Nurse Education in Practice, 8, 76-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2007.02.002
- Draper, S. W., & Brown, M. I. (2004). Increasing Interactivity in Lectures Using an Electronic Voting System. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 81-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00074.x
- Gok, T. (2011). An Evaluation of Student Response Systems from the Viewpoint of Instructors and Students. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10, 67-83.
- Grez, D. (2010). Student Response System and Learning Oral Presentation Skills. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 1786-1789. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.985
- Groen, J. (2010). Clickers in Higher Education: A Tool to Increase Student Feedback and Participation. Centre for University Teaching, 3.
- Hancock, T. M. (2010). Use of Audience Response Systems for Summative Assessment in Large Classes Summative Assessment in Large Classes. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26, 226-237. http://dx.doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1092
- Heaslip, G., Donovan, P., & Cullen, J. G. (2014). Student Response Systems and Learner Engagement in Large Classes. Active Learning in Higher Education, 15, 11-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1469787413514648
- Hoekstra, A., & Mollborn, S. (2012). How Clicker Use Facilitates Existing Pedagogical Practices in Higher Education: Data from Interdisciplinary Research on Student Response Systems. Learning, Media and Technology, 37, 303-320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2011.568493