Impact of “Body Language and Public Speaking” Training on Physical Education Trainees’ Perceptions Self-Efficacy Pedagoguique
- 1 Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education, Tunis, Tunisia
- 2 Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education, Tunis, Tunisia
- 3 Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education, Tunis, Tunisia
- 4 Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education, Tunis, Tunisia
- 5 Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education, Tunis, Tunisia
- 6 Higher Instituteof Dramatic Arts, Tunis, Tunisia
Abstract
This study measures the impact of additional training in communication (Body Language and Public Speaking) on the sense of self-efficacy trainee teachers of physical education during the preparation internship working life. An experimental group that received additional theoretical and practical training in the classroom communication was compared to a control group that followed the initial training course. Two measures of this sentiment were taken at different times using the questionnaire “Perceptions of self-efficacy of teachers (PAE)” cited by Crahay & Laduron (2009). This device allows to apprehend two dimensions: the perception of overall effectiveness and perceived self-efficacy. The analysis provides students who have received training in Body Language and Public Speaking to express a sense of greater efficiency than those who have received usual initial training.
- Altet, M. (1994). The Professional Training of Teachers. PUF, Coll. Pedagogy of “Today”.
- Archambault, J., & Chouinard, R. (2009). Vers une gestion éducative de la classe (3e éd.). Boucherville: Gaetan Morin éditeur.
- Bandura, A. (1994). Self Efficacy, In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior (pp. 71-81). New York: Academic Press.
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Co.
- Bandura, A. (2007). Self-Efficiency, the Self-Efficacy Feeling. Bruxelles: De Boeck University.
- Beckers, J. (2007). Compétences et identité professionnelles: L’enseignement et autres métiers de l’interaction humaine. Bruxelles: De Boeck Université. http://hdl.handle.net/2268/1898
- Crahay, M., & Laduron, I. (2009). Les croyances des enseignants peuvent-elles évoluer? Fonctions,origines et évolution des croyances des enseignants. Revue Francaise de Pédagogie.
- Deaudelin, C., & Dussault, M. (2002). Incidence d’une stratégie de développement professionnel des enseignants sur l’intégration des technologies de l’information et de la communication à leur enseignement, dans un contexte de développement organisationnel. Rapport de recherché, Québec: Gouvernement du Québec.
- Dufour, F., & Chouinard, R. (2013). Classroom Management Support System: Testing with Teaching Beginners. Education& Formation, e-299, 52-66.
- Dussault, M., & Deaudelin, C. (2001). L’échelle d’autoefficacité des enseignants: Validation canadienne-francaise du Teacher efficacy scale. Revue des sciences de l’éducation, XXVII(1), 181-194.
- Gervais, C., & Desrosiers, P. (2005). The School, a Place of Teacher Training. Questions and Accompanying Benchmarks for Trainees. Sainte-Foy: Laval University Press.
- Gibson, S., & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher Efficacy: A Construct Validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 569- 582.
- Heneman III, H. G., Kimball, S., & Milanowski, A. (2006). The Teacher Sense of Efficacy Scale: Validation Evidence and Behavioral Prediction. WCER Working Paper No. 2006-7, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin Center for Education Research. http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/publications/workingPapers/Working_Paper_No_2006_07.pdf
- Kennedy, D. (1993). Spring Break. In: E. Messer-Davidow, D. R. Shumway & D. J. Sylvan (Eds.), Knowledge: Historical and Critical Studies in Interdisciplinarity (pp. 422-462). Charlottesville, VI: University Press of Virgina.