Reducing the number of face-to-face laboratory sessions and supplementing with virtual/online alternatives are critical to managing the combined pressures of increasing first-year student numbers and decreasing university budgets. Most of the research studies about online practicals are hypothesis generating rather than hypothesis testing thus only providing initial support and direction for the generation of pedagogically sound online laboratory teaching. This pilot study investigated the effectiveness of using a combination of online and face-to-face practical sessions to enable students in a Microbiology unit, offered to students completing several health science courses, to connect discipline-specific theory and practical application. Quantitative and qualitative data were gathered using a paper-based questionnaire from 72 first-year students. Results showed that 65 percent of students preferred a combination of face-to-face and online sessions. Furthermore, determinants for engagement with online sessions varied with student gender.
KeywordsBiomedical and Health SciencesHigher EducationMicrobiologyOnline and Face-to-Face Practicals
Alonso, F., López, G., Manrique, D., & Vines, J. M. (2005). An Instructional Model for Web-Based E-Learning Education with a Blended Learning Process Approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 217-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00454.x
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Boston, MA: Pearson.
Astleitner, H., & Steinberg, R. (2005). Are There Gender Differences in Web-Based Learning? An Integrated Model and Related Effect Sizes. AACE Journal, 13, 47-63.
Baker, N., & Verran, J. (2004). The Future of Microbiology Laboratory Classes—Wet, Dry or in Combination?.Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2, 338-342.
Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing Teaching through Constructive Alignment. Higher Education, 32, 347-364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00138871
Blewett, E. L., & Kisamore, J. L. (2009). Evaluation of an Interactive, Case-Based Review Session in Teaching Medical Microbiology. BMC Medical Education, 9, 1-9.
Britten, S., New, P., Sharma, M., & Yardley, D. (2005). A Case Study of Transfer of the Transfer of Mathematics Skills by University Students. International Journalof Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 36, 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207390412331271401
Collins, A., Greeno, J., & Resnick, L. (2001). Educational Learning Theory. The International Encyclopaedia of the Social and Behavioural Sciences. New York: Elsevier Science.
Cook, M. P. (2006). Visual Representations in Science Education: The Influence of Prior Knowledge and Cognitive Load Theory on Instructional Design Principles. Science Education, 90, 1073-1091. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sce.20164
Crawley, A., & Fetzner, M. (2013). Providing Innovative Service to Students inside and outside of the Online Classroom: A Student Perspective. Online Learning: Official Journal of the Online Learning Consortium, 17, 7-12.
Cuadrado-García, M., Ruiz-Molina, M. E., & Montoro-Pons, J. D. (2010). Are There GENDER Differences in E-Learning Use and Assessment? Evidence from an Interuniversity Online Project in Europe. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 367-371. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.027
Dee, F. R., Lehman, J. M., Consoer, D., Leaven, T., & Cohen, M. B. (2003). Implementation of Virtual Microscope Slides in the Annual Pathobiology of Cancer Workshop Laboratory. Human Biology, 34, 430-436.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Evans, C., Gibbons, N. J., Sha, K., & Griffin, D. K. (2004). Virtual Learning in the Biological Sciences: Pitfalls of Simply “Putting Notes on the Web”. Computers & Education, 43, 49-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2003.12.004
Finkelstein, N. D., Adams, W. K., Keller, C. J., Kohl, P. B., Perkins, K. K., Podolefsky, N. S., & LeMaster, R. (2005). When Learning about the Real World Is Better Done Virtually: A Study of Substituting Computer Simulations for Laboratory Equipment. Physical Review Special Topics: Physics Education Research, 1, 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.1.010103
Gilman, S. L. (2006). Do Online Labs Work? An Assessment of an Online Lab on Celldivision. American Biology Teacher, 68, 131-134.
Grossman, R. (2005). Discovering Hidden Transformations: Making Science and Other Courses More Learnable. College Teaching, 53, 33-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.53.1.33-40
Hargittai, E., & Shafer, S. (2006). Differences in Actual and Perceived Online Skills: The Role of Gender. Social Science Quarterly, 87, 432-448. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00389.x
Hiltz, S. R., & Shea, P. (2005). The Student in the Online Classroom. Learning Together Online. In S. R. Hiltz, & R. Goldman (Eds.), Research on Asynchronous Learning Networks (pp. 145-168). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hoddinott, J. (2000). Biggs’ Constructive Alignment: Evaluation of a Pedagogical Model Applied to a Web Course. In Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2000, World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, Montreal (pp. 1631-1632).
Johnson, T. E., & Gedney, C. (2001). Learning Support Assessment Study of a Computer Simulation for the Development of Microbial Identification Strategies. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 2, 18-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/154288101X14285805863424
Lobato, J. (2006). Transfer Strand: Alternative Perspectives on the Transfer of Learning: History, Issues, and Challenges for Future Research. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 431-449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1504_1
Macauley, C., & Cree, V. E. (1999). Transfer of Learning: Concept and Process. Social Work Education: The International Journal, 18, 183-194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02615479911220181
Maldarelli, G. A., Hartmann, E. M., Cummings, P. J., Horner, R.D., Obom, K.M., Shingles, R., & Pearlman, R. S. (2009). Virtual Lab Demonstrations Improve Students’ Mastery of Basic Biology Laboratory Techniques. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 10, 51-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v10.99
Papo, W. (2001). Integration of Educational Media in Higher Education Large Classes. Educational Media International, 38, 95-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09523980110041908
Perone, J. S., & Tucker, L. (2003). An Exploration of Triangulation of Methodologies: Quantitative and Qualitative Methodology Fusion in an Investigation of Perceptions of Transit Safety. Report No. NCTR-416-08.1-08.2. http://www.dot.state.fl.us/research-center/Completed_Proj/Summary_PTO/FDOT_BC137_22_rpt.pdf
Phillips, V., & Bond, C. (2004). Undergraduates’ Experiences of Critical Thinking. Higher Education Research & Development, 23, 277-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0729436042000235409
Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001). Web-Based Virtual Learning Environments: A Research Framework and a Preliminary Assessment of Effectiveness in Basic IT Skills Training. MIS Quarterly, 25, 401-426. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3250989
Rajagopal, I., & Bojin, N. (2003). A Gendered World: Students and Instructional Technologies. First Monday, 8. http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v8i1.1023
Saldana, J. (2009). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Sancho, P., Corral, R., Rivas, T., Gonzalez, M. J., Chordi, A., & Tejedor, C. (2006). A Blended Learning Experience for Teaching Microbiology. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 70, 120.
Saunders, G., & Klemming, F. (2003). Integrating Technology into a Traditional Learning Environment Reasons for and Risks of Success. Active Learning in Higher Education, 4, 74-86.
Shibley, I., Amaral, K. E., Shank, J. D., & Shibley, L. R. (2011). Designing a Blended Course: Using ADDIE to Guide Instructional Design. Journal of College Science Teaching, 40, 80-85.
Stuckey-Mickell, T. A., & Stuckey-Danner, B. D. (2007). Virtual Labs in the Online Biology Course: Student Perceptions of Effectiveness and Usability. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 3, 105-111.
Sunal, W. S., Sunal, C. S., Odell, M. R., & Sundberg, C. A. (2003). Research-Supported Best Practices for Developing Online Learning. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 2, 1-40.
Sullivan, P. (2001). Gender Differences and the Online Classroom: Male and Female College Students Evaluate Their Experiences. Community College Journal of Research &Practice, 25, 805-818.
Swan, K. (2001). Virtual Interaction: Design Factors Affecting Student Satisfaction and Perceived Learning in Asynchronous Online Courses. Distance Education, 22, 306-331. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0158791010220208
Wahlgren, C. F., Edelbring, S., Fors, U., Hindbeck, H., & Stahle, M. (2006). Evaluation of an Interactive Case Simulation System in Dermatology and Venereology for Medical Students. BMC Medical Education, 6, 40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-6-40