Motivation Expectations and Motivational Styles Adopted by the Physical Education Teacher towards His Students: A Study in a Natural Context of Teaching and Learning — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Motivation Expectations and Motivational Styles Adopted by the Physical Education Teacher towards His Students: A Study in a Natural Context of Teaching and Learning
Institut supérieur de l’éducation et de la formation continue, Bouchoucha, Tunisie
,
Institut supérieur de sport et de l’éducation physique de ksar said, Tunis, Tunisie
,
Observatoire national du sport Tunisien, Tunis, Tunisie
1 Institut supérieur de l’éducation et de la formation continue, Bouchoucha, Tunisie
2 Institut supérieur de sport et de l’éducation physique de ksar said, Tunis, Tunisie
3 Observatoire national du sport Tunisien, Tunis, Tunisie
The effects of the teacher’s expectations on students’ motivation remain an area of investigation where the results are still controversial. This article presents the main results of a study on the relationship between motivation expectations of Physical Education (PE) teachers and the behaviors exhibited toward their students in a natural context of PE teaching in Tunisia (gymnastics cycle). The theoretical framework is based on three categories of work: 1) the work on the “Pygmalion effect”, 2) research relating to self-determination theory and classroom interactions expressed by quantity, content and the style of verbal communication between teachers and students, and 3) the work examining the links between teachers’ initial expectations towards the students and these interactions. The objective of this study is to analyze the consequences of pre-existing and lightly studied expectations regarding the motivation on the frequency, content and motivational style (i.e., controlling vs. autonomy-supportive) interactions that a PE teacher has with students. Seven hundred and thirty students from all classes of second cycle basic education and their thirty teachers were observed during gymnastics classes. The teachers’ motivation expectations and self-determination index of students were measured at the beginning of the cycle. The teacher-student interactions were recorded during each session (50 minutes) corresponding to a teacher (thirty sessions on the whole) and encoded using two instruments. The main results show that: a) teachers have expressed more communications with high expectations than low ones; b) the teachers’ expectations are positively related to technical instructions and autonomy-supportive style and negatively to unfavorable affective feedback and a controlling style. These different dimensions mentioned above make up important mediators of “Pygmalion effect” that certain studies have noted in PE.
Adair, J. G., Sharpe, D., & Huynh, C. L. (1989). Placebo, Hawthorne, and Other Artifact Controls: Researchers’ Opinions and Practices. Journal of Experimental Education, 57, 341-335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1989.10806515
Babad, E. Y., Rosenthal, R., & Inbar, J. (1982). Pygmalion, Galatea, and the Golem: Investigations of Biased and Unbiased Teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 459-474. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.74.4.459
Babad, E. Y. (1998). Preferential Affect: The Crux of the Teacher Expectancy Issue. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advanced in Research on Teaching: Expectations in the Classroom (Vol. 7, pp. 183-214). Greenwuch, CT: JAI Press.
Babad, E. Y. (1993). Teachers’ Differential Behaviour. Educational Psychology Review, 5, 347- 376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01320223
Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing Interaction: An Introduction to Sequential Analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511527685
Biddle, S., Chatzisarantis, N., & Hagger, M. (2001). Théorie de l’autodétermination dans le domaine du sport et de l’exercice physique. In F. Cury, & P. Sarrazin (Eds.), Théories de la motivation et pratique sportive. Etat des recherches (pp. 19-55). Paris: PUF.
Biddle, S. J., & Goudas, M. (1997). Effort Is Virtuous: Teacher Preferences of Pupil Effort, Ability and Grading in Physical Education. Educational Research, 39, 350-355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0013188970390310
Briere, N., Blais, M., Pelletier, L., & Vallerand, R. (1995). Developpement et Validation d’une Mesure de Motivation Intrinsèque, Extrinsèque et d’Amotivation en Contexte Sportif: L’Echelle de Motivation dans les Sports (EMS). International Journal of Sport Psychology, 26, 465-489.
Brophy, J., & Good, T. (1974). Teacher-Student Relationships: Causes and Consequences. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Bryan, C. L., & Solmon, M. A. (2007). Self-Determination in Physical Education: Designing Class Environments to Promote Active Lifestyles. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 26, 260-278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.26.3.260
Carreiro da Costa, F., Marques da Costa, C., Diniz, J. A., & Piéron, M. (1998). Uneanalyse de la qualité du feedback. In C. Amade-Escot, J.-P. Barrué, J.-C. Bos, F. Dufor, M. Dugrand, & A. Terrisse (dir.), Recherches enEPS: Bilan et perspectives (pp. 215-224). Paris: éditions EP&S.
Cloes, M., Ledent, M., & Piéron, M. (2004). Motiver pour éduquer, un éclairage qualitatif. In G. Carlier (dir.), Si l’on parlait du plaisir d’enseigner l’education physique (pp. 65-73). Montpellier: éditions AFRAPS.
Cooper, H. (1979). Pygmalion Grows Up: A Model for Teacher Expectation Communication and Performance Influence. Review of Educational Research, 49, 389-410. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543049003389
Covington, M. V., & Omelich, C. L. (1979). It’s Best to Be Able and Virtuous Too: Student and Teacher Evaluative Responses to Successful Effort. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 686- 700. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.71.5.688
Darley, J. M., & Fazio, R. H. (1980). Expectancy-Confirmation Processes Arising in the Social Interaction Sequence. American Psychologist, 35, 867-881. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.35.10.867
Deci, J. M., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The General Causality Orientations Scale. Self-Determination in Personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 109-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6
Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and Education: The Self-Determination Perspective. The Educational Psychologist, 83, 642-650.
Duru-Bellat, M., & Mingat, A. (1994). La variété du fonctionnement de l’école: Identification et analyse des “effets-maitre”. In M. Crahay, & A. Lafontaine (Eds.), évaluation et Analyse des Etablissements de Formation (Pages). Bruxelles: De Boeck.
Dusek, J., & Joseph, G. (1983). The Bases of Teacher Experiences: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 327-346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.75.3.327
Famose, J. P. (2001). La motivation en éducation physique et en sport. Paris: Armond Colin/VUEF.
Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. (2000). Looking in Classrooms (8th éd.). New York: Longman.
Hagger, M. S., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2007). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Exercise and Sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., Culverhouse, T., & Biddle, S. J. H. (2003). The Processes by Which Perceived Autonomy Support in Physical Education Promotes Leisure-Time Physical Activity Intentions and Behavior: A Trans-Contextual Model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 784-795. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.784
Harris, M. J., & Rosenthal, R. (1985). Mediation of Interpersonal Expectancy Effects: Thirty-One Meta-Analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 363-386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.97.3.363
Horn, T. (1984). Expectancy Effects in the Interscholastic Athletic Setting: Methodological Concerns. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 6, 60-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/jsp.6.1.60
Horn, T., Lox, C., & Labrador, F. (1998). The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy Theory: When Coaches’ Expectations Become Reality. In J. Williams (Ed.), Applied Sport Psychology: Personal Growth to Peak Performance (pp. 74-91). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
Jussim, L. (1986). Self-Fulfilling Prophecies: A Theoretical and Integrative Review. Psychological Review, 93, 429-445. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.4.429
Jussim, L., & Eccles, J. (1992). Teacher Expectations 2: Construction and Reflection of Student Achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 947-961. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.6.947
Jussim, L., Smith, A., Madon, S., & Palumbo, P. (1998). Teacher Expectations. Advances in Research of Teaching, 7, 1-48.
Karper, W. B., & Martinek, T. J. (1983). The Differential Influence of Instructional Factors on Motor Performance among Handicapped and Non-Handicapped Children in Mainstreamedphysical Education Classes. Educational Research Quarterly, 8, 40-46.
Mageau, G. A., & Vallerand, R. J. (2003). The Coach-Athlete Relationship: A Motivational Model. Journal of Sports Sciences, 21, 883-904. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0264041031000140374
Martel, D., Brunelle, J., & Spallanzani, C. (1994). Validation d’un système d’observation du climat d’apprentissage en activité physique. Revue des Sciences de l’éducation, 20, 493-511. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/031738ar
Martinek, T. (1980). Stability of a Teacher’s Expectations for Elementary School Age Children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 51, 1269-1270. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.1980.51.3f.1269
Martinek, T. (1988). Confirmation of a Teacher Expectancy Model: Student Perceptions and Causal Attributions of Teaching Behaviors. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 59, 118- 126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1988.10605488
Martinek, T. (1989). The Psycho-Social Dynamics of the Pygmalion Phenomenon in Physical Education and Sport. In T. J. Templin, & P. G. Schempp (Eds.), Socialisation in to Physical Education: Learning to Teach (pp. 199-217). Indianapolis, IN: Benchmark.
Martinek, T. (1991). Psycho-Social Dynamics of Teaching Physical Education. Dubuque, IA: Brown and Benchmark.
Martinek, T., & Johnson, S. (1979). Teacher Expectations. Effect on Dyadic Interaction and Self- Concept in Elementary Age Children. Research Quarterly, 50, 60-70.
Martinek, T., & Karper, W. (1982). Canonical Relationships among Motor Ability, Expression of Effort, Teacher Expectations in Elementary Age Children. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 1, 26-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.1.2.26
Martinek, T., & Karper, W. (1984). The Effects of Non Competitive and Competitive Instructional Climates on Expectancy Effects in Elementary Physical Education Classes. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 6, 408-421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/jsp.6.4.408
Merton, R. (1948). The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy. The Antioch Review, 8, 193-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4609267
Ministry of Youth and Sports (2015). Article 17 and the Minstry of Education, Article 104-01/ 2015. Institution Project in the Area of Physical Education and Sports Activities, Tunisie 10/11/2015.
Nachtscheim, N., & Hoy, W. K. (1976). Authoritarian Personality and Control Ideologies of Teachers. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 22, 173-178.
Ntoumanis, N. (2001). A Self-Determination Approach to the Understanding of Motivation in Physical Education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 225-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000709901158497
Ntoumanis, N. (2005). A Prospective Study of Participation in Optional School Physical Education Using a Self-Determination Theory Framework. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 444-453. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.444
Pelletier, L., Seguin-Levesque, C., & Legault, L. (2002). Pressure from Above and Pressure from Below as Determinants of Teachers’ Motivation and Teaching Behaviors. Journal of Educa- tional Psychology, 94, 186-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.1.186
Pelletier, L., & Vallerand, R. (1996). Supervisors’ Beliefs and Subordonates’ Intrinsic Motivation: A Behavioral Confirmation Analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 331- 340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.331
Pieron, M., & Carreiro Da Costa, F. (1996). Seeking Expert Teachers in Physical Education and Sport. European Journal of Physical Education, 1, 5-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1740898960010102
Pieron, M. (1993). Analyser l’enseignement pour mieux enseigner. Paris: Ed. Revue E.P.S.
Pieron, M., Cloes, M., Luts, K., Ledent, M., Pirottini, V., & Delfosse, C. (1998). Analyse de la prise en considération des caractéristiques individuelles des élèves dans les décisions et les comportements des enseignants experts et débutants. Rapport final d’une recherche réalisée dans le cadre d’une convention passée entre la Communauté francaise de Belgique et l’Université de Liège (157/96). Liège: ISEPK.
Reeve, J. (2002). Self-Determination Theory Applied to Educational Settings. In E. Deci, & R. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Determination Research (pp. 183-203). Rochester, NY: The University of Rochester Press.
Reeve, J., Bolt, E., & Cai, Y. (1999). Autonomy-Supportive Teachers: How They Teach and Motivate Students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 537-548. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.537
Reeve, J., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Self-Determination Theory: A Dialectical Framework for Understanding Socio-Cultural Influences on Student Motivation. In D. M. Mclnerney, & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Big Theories Revisited (pp. 31-60). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Press.
Rosenthal, R. (1974). On the Social Psychology of the Self-Fulfilling Prophecy: Further Evidence for Pygmalion Effects and Their Mediating Mechanisms. New York: MSS Modular Publications.
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the Classroom: Teacher Expectation and Student Intellectual Development (p. 47). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2007). Self-Determination Theory and the Promotion and Maintenance of Sport, Exercise, and Health. In M. S. Hagger, & N. L. D. Chatzisarantis (Eds.), Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Exercise and Sport (pp. 1-19). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). Overview of Self-Determination Theory: An Organismic Dialectical Perspective. In E. L. Deci, & M. R. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Determination Research (pp. 3-33). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
Sarrazin, P. (2001). Approches socio-cognitives de la motivation appliquée au champ du sport et de l’EPS. HDR.
Sarrazin, P., Tessier, D., & Trouilloud, D. (2006). Climat motivationnel instauré par l’enseignant et implication des élèves en classe: l’état des recherches. Revue Francaise de Pédagogie, 157, 147-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/rfp.463
Sarrazin, P., Tessier, D., Pelletier, L., Trouilloud, D., & Chanal, J. (2006). The Effects of Teachers’ Expectations about Students’ Motivation on Teachers’ Autonomy-Supportive and Controlling Behaviors. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 4, 283-301.
Sarrazin, P., Trouilloud, D., & Bois, J. (2005). Attentes du superviseur et performance sportive de pratiquant. Amplitude et fonctionnement de l’effet pygmalion en contexte sportif. Bulletin de Psychologie 1/2005 (Numéro 475), 63-68.
Sarrazin, P., Trouilloud, D., Tessier, D., Chanal, J., & Bois, J. (2005). Attentes de motivation et comportements différenciés de l’enseignant d’éducation physique et sportive à l’égard de ses élèves: Une étude en contexte naturel d’enseignement. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée, 55, 111-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2004.06.005
Sarrazin, P., Vallerand, R. J., Guillet, E., Pelletier, R., & Cury, F. (2002). Motivation and Dropout in Female Handballers: A 21-Month Prospective Study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 395-418.
Sarthou, J. J. (2003). Enseigner l’EPS. De la réflexion didactique à l’action pédagogique. Paris: Editions Actio.
Smith, R. E., Smoll, F. L., & Hunt, E. (1977). A System for the Behavioral Assessment of Athletic Coaches. Research Quarterly, 48, 401-408.
Snyder, M. (1984). When Belief Creates Reality. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 247-305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60146-X
Solomon, G. B., Striegel, D. A., Eliot, J. F., Heon, S. N., Maas, J. L., & Wayda, V. K. (1996). The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy in College Basketball: Implications for Effective Coaching. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 9, 44-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10413209608406307
Spallanzani, C. (1995). Description de l’effet Pygmalion sur le temps d’apprentissage offert à des élèves en éducation physique au primaire. Avante, 1, 1-18.
Trouilloud, D. (2002). L’effet Pygmalion en Education Physique et Sportive. Réalité, processus médiateurs et variables modératrices de l’influence des attentes de l’enseignant sur la motivation et la performance des élèves. Thèse de Doctorat, Grenoble: Université J.Fourier.
Trouilloud, D., & Sarrazin, P. (2002). L’effet Pygmalion existe-t-il en éducation physique et sportive? Influence des attentes des enseignants sur la motivation et la performance des élèves. Science & Motricité, 46, 69-94.
Trouilloud, D., Sarrazin, P., Bressoux, P., & Bois, J. (2006). Relation between Teachers’ Early Expectations and Students’ Later Perceived Competence in Physical Education Classes: Autonomy-Supportive Climate as a Moderator. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 75-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.75
Trouilloud, D., & Sarrazin, P. (2003). Les connaissances actuelles sur l’effet Pygmalion: Processus, poids et modulateurs. Revue Francaise de Pédagogie, 145, 89-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/rfp.2003.2988
Trouilloud, D., Sarrazin, P., Martinek, T., & Guillet, E. (2002). The Influence of Teacher Expectations on Student Achievement on Physical Education Classes: Pygmalion Revisited. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 591-607. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.109
Vallerand, R. J., & Bissonette, R. (1992). Intrinsic, Extrinsic and Amotivational Styles as Predictors of Behavior: A Prospective Study. Journal of Personality, 60, 599-620. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00922.x
Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a Hierarchical Model of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 271-360). New York: Academic Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60019-2
Vallerand, R. J. (2007). A Hierarchical Model of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation for Sport and Physical Activity. In M. S. Hagger, & N. L. D. Chatzisarantis (Eds.), Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Exercise and Sport (pp. 255-279). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Vallerand, R. J., & Losier, G. F. (1999). An Integrative Analisis of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation in Sport. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 11, 142-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10413209908402956
Vallerand, R. J., Blais, M., Briere, N., & Pelletier, L. (1989). Construction et validation de l’Echelle de Motivation en Education (EME). Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 21, 323-349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0079855
Weinstein, R. S., & Middlestadt, S. E. (1979). Student Perceptions of Teacher Interactions with High and Low Achievers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 421-431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.71.4.421
Weinstein, R. S. (1985). Student Mediation of Classroom Expectancy Effects. In J. Dusek (Ed.), Teacher Expectancies (pp. 329-350). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Wolfe, M. L., & Engel, J. O. (1978). Dimensions of Opinion about Teacher-Pupil Relations. The Journal of Experimental Education, 46, 41-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1978.11011630
Yee, A. H., & Frutcher, B. (1971). Factor Content of the MTAI. American Educational Research Journal, 8, 116-133.