Benefits and Drawbacks of China’s Top-Down Innovation Campaign in Tertiary Science Education
- 1 School of Foreign Languages, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (UESTC), Chengdu, China
- 2 Israel Culture and Science-and-Technology Innovation Research Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (UESTC), Chengdu, China
Abstract
This paper presents an analysis on China’s innovative education reform in the tertiary science education from the background of a top-down innovative campaign to its purposes, reasons, effects and challenges. Under the heading of innovation and entrepreneurship education, changes happen in perspectives of educational ideology and practice, involving a wide range of policy backups, learning modes, curriculum reconstruction, teaching ability building, and entrepreneurship supervision improvement, etc. Conclusions show that the top-down innovation campaign is changing the old fabric of knowledge and skill based teaching and learning mode into a practice and innovation based teaching and learning reform. Students and teachers can enjoy a group of stimulant policies, from workload accounting of academic advisors to awarded credits for traditional courses, from scholarship recommendation and quality evaluation to postgraduate selection, from exempting learning and assessment to IE credit replacement, together with the overall arrangement of talent training. However, challenges come from curriculum reconstruction, interdisciplinary cooperation, teaching contents and pedagogy, which reflects the drawbacks of a top-down model of innovation.
- Deng, H. (2015). How to Five Entrepreneurship Education Classes. http://theory.people.com.cn/n/2015/0515/c40531-27004278.html
- Education Bureau (2014). Information Exacted on 27 November 2016. http://www.edb.gov.hk/en/curriculum-development/kla/science-edu/index.html
- General Office of the State Council (2015). Implementation Opinions on Deepening Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education Reforms at Universities and Colleges. Information Extracted on 27 November 2016. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xxgk/moe_1777/moe_1778/201505/t20150514_188069.html
- Geyser, W. (1990). Creativity and Human Development. The International Encyclopedia of Education, 2, 496-499. Guiyang: Guizhou Education Press.
- Keith S. T. (2009). Progressing Science Education: Constructing the Scientific Research Programme into the Contingent Nature of Learning Science. Berlin: Springer.
- Liaoning Reporter Center of China Daily (2015). The Midas Touch of Northeastern University for Students’ Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Information Extracted on 27 November 2016. http://cnews.chinadaily.com.cn/2015-05/15/content_20728792.htm
- Ma, Y. (2007). On Concepts of Science Education. Information Extracted on 27 November 2016. http://chem.cersp.com/JCJX/200702/2676_4.html
- Sun, M. (2016). Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security: University Graduates Are Encouraged to Find Jobs in Basic Level Governments. Information Extracted on 27 November 2016. http://big5.gmw.cn/g2b/politics.gmw.cn/2016-07/22/content_21089323.htm
- Thomas, S. (2010). The Importance of Quality Education. China Daily, 15 July 2015. Information Extracted on 27 November 2016. http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/opinion/2010-07/15/content_10108431.htm
- Wang, Q. (2016). Thinking Education: Layouts of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education at Colleges and Universities. Xinhua Education. Information Extracted on 27 November 2016. http://education.news.cn/2016-01/06/c_128600836.htm
- Wikipedia (2016). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science_education
- Xu, S. (2016). An Innovative Campaign Is Changing the Fabric of Chinese Science Education: Opportunities and Challenges. In 2016 the International Conference on Economic Science and Management Engineering.
- Yuan, Y, & Cai, T. (2003). Science Curriculum and Pedagogy. Huangzhou: Zhejiang Education Press.