Psychopedagogists’ Conceptions of the Learning Process and Psychopedagogical Interventions Involving University Students with Disabilities and/or Learning Difficulties
- 1 Graduate Program in Education, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
- 2 Graduate Program in Education, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
Abstract
This study aimed to describe psychopedagogists’ views on the factors intervening in the learning process of university students with disabilities and/or learning difficulties. These students were attended by an institutional psychopedagogical service at a Brazilian university. Thus, the study also aimed to outline the main interventions carried out in this context. Five professionals who attended the students were interviewed and a qualitative content analysis of their responses was conducted. The results indicate emotional aspects were highlighted as factors that, according to the psychopedagogists, interfere with students’ learning process. Adapting psychopedagogical interventions to adults was considered a challenge by professionals, who emphasized the use of listening and emotional support as central tools in this process, even though some participants believed such tools are not traditionally used in psychopedagogical protocol.
- Almeida, L. S. (2007). Transition, Academic Adaptation and Success in Higher Education. Revista Galego-Portuguesa de Psicoloxía e Educacion, 14, 203-215.
- Almeida, L., Marinho-Araujo, C. M., Amaral, A., & Dias, D. (2012). Democratization of Access and Success in Higher Education: A Reflection Based on the Realities of Portugal and Brazil. Avaliacao: Revista da Avaliacao da Educacao Superior, 17, 899-920.
- Bardagi, M. P., & Hutz, C. S. (2009). There Was No Other Way out: Students’ Perceptions about the Dropping out in the Higher Course. Psico-USF, 14, 95-105.
- Bardagi, M., & Hutz, C. S. (2014). University Evasion and Student Support Services: A Brief Review of Brazilian Literature. Psicologia Revista. Revista da Faculdade de Ciencias Humanas e da Saúde,14, 279-301.
- Bardin, L. (2010). Contentanalysis. (1977). Lisboa (Portugal): Edicoes, 70.
- Becker, F., & Marques, T. B. I. (2000). Human Learning: Construction Process. Patio, 4, 58-61.
- Cunha, S. M., & Carrilho, D. M. (2005). The Process of Adaptation to Higher Education and Academic Performance. Psicologia escolar e educacional, 9, 215-224.
- Faria, P. A. (2010). Psychopedagogy and Higher Education: The Multiple and Possibilities of Learning and Teaching. Construcao psicopedagogica, 18, 79-93.
- Laville, C., & Dionne, J. (1999). The Construction of Knowledge: Methodology Manual of Research in Human Sciences. Artmed: UFMG.
- Magalhaes, R. C. B. P. (2013). Curriculum and Inclusion of Students with Disabilities in Higher Education: Reflections on University Teaching. In F. R. L. Melo (Org.), Inclusion in Higher Education: Teaching and Special Educational Needs (pp. 45-56). Natal: EDUFRN.
- Marian, A. L., Ferrari, D., & Sekkel, M. C. (2007). Inclusive Education in Higher Education: A New Challenge. Psicologia Ciencia e Profissao, 27, 636-647.
- Minayo, M. C. S. (1998). Social Research: Theory, Method and Creativity. Petropolis: Vozes.
- Moreira, L. C., Bolsanello, M. A., & Seger, R. G. (2011). Admission and Permanence in the University: Students with Disabilities in Focus. Educar em Revista, No. 41, 125-143.
- Pain, S. (1988). The Function of Ignorance. Porto Alegre: Artmed.
- Piaget, J. (1973). Problems of Genetic Psychology. Rio de Janeiro: Forense.