Study of Methods to Improve the Counselors’ Scientific Research
- 1 School of Economics and Management, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, China
- 2 School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, China
Abstract
As the main body of moral education, counselors are the backbone of College Students’ Ideological and Political Education. Counselor work plays a key role. It is very important to improve the ideological and political quality of college students, to promote the reform and development of higher education, to maintain the stability of school and society and to promote the all-round development of college students. At present, as the first line of moral education workers in colleges and universities, counselors need to shift from a single experience to complex research, in order to meet the needs of College Students’ Ideological and Political Education in the new era. At first, this paper is based on the analysis of the present situation and analyzes the problems existing in the scientific research ability of college counselors from four aspects: the cognition of scientific research, the consciousness of scientific research, the spirit of scientific research, the relevant knowledge base and the scientific research environment. At last, the study puts forward the concrete countermeasures from four aspects: system guarantee, platform support, environmental pull and initiative promotion.
- Adair, J. G., Sharpe, D., & Huynh, C. L. (1989). Placebo, Hawthorne, and Other Artifact Controls: Researchers’ Opinions and Practices. Journal of Experimental Education, 57, 341-335. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1989.10806515
- Babad, E. Y. (1993). Teachers’ Differential Behaviour. Educational Psychology Review, 5, 347-376. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01320223
- Babad, E. Y. (1998). Preferential Affect: The Crux of the Teacher Expectancy Issue. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advanced in Research on Teaching: Expectations in the Classroom (Vol. 7, pp. 183-214). Greenwich: JAI Press.
- Babad, E. Y., Rosenthal, R., & Inbar, J. (1982). Pygmalion, Galatea, and the Golem: Investigations of Biased and Unbiased Teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 459-474. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.74.4.459
- Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing Interaction: An Introduction to Sequential Analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527685
- Biddle, S. J., & Goudas, M. (1997). Effort Is Virtuous: Teacher Preferences of Pupil Effort, Ability and Grading in Physical Education. Educational Research, 39, 350-355. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188970390310
- Biddle, S., Chatzisarantis, N., & Hagger, M. (2001). Théorie de l’autodétermination dans le domaine du sport et de l’exercice physique. In F. Cury, & P. Sarrazin (Eds.), Théories de la motivation et pratique sportive. Etat des recherches (pp. 19-55). Paris: PUF.
- Briere, N., Blais, M., Pelletier, L., & Vallerand, R. (1995). Developpement et Validation d’une Mesure de Motivation Intrinsèque, Extrinsèque et d’Amotivation en Contexte Sportif: L’Echelle de Motivation dans les Sports (EMS). International Journal of Sport Psychology, 26, 465-489.
- Brophy, J., & Good, T. (1974). Teacher-Student Relationships: Causes and Consequences. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
- Bryan, C. L., & Solmon, M. A. (2007). Self-Determination in Physical Education: Designing Class Environments to Promote Active Lifestyles. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 26, 260-278. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.26.3.260
- Carreiro da Costa, F., Marques da Costa, C., Diniz, J. A., & Piéron, M. (1998). Uneanalyse de la qualité du feedback. In C. Amade-Escot, J.-P. Barrué, J.-C. Bos, F. Dufor, M. Dugrand, & A. Terrisse (Eds.), Recherches enEPS: Bilan et perspectives (pp. 215-224). Paris: éditions EP & S.