Why & How We Apply PBL to Science-Gifted Education?
- 1 Incheon National University, Incheon, Korea
Abstract
This study is based upon the reflections of two teachers and fifteen students as they experience problem-based learning (PBL) for the first time. A PBL exercise was integrated into a curriculum-based Earth Science field to meet specific learning requirements of gifted students. If you give affirmative answers to all these questions, it will not be the distinctive program for the gifted children (Passow, 1982). PBL is an educational approach where a purposefully illstructured real-world problem initiates learning and the teacher serves as a coach instead of an information repository. Problem-based learning is currently used in the various disciplines. However, the field of gifted education does not yet implement this type of teaching and learning approach very often. In the present study the PBL implementation created a new learning environment for both students and teachers, and PBL was evaluated as an educative strategy. The application of the instructional approach could have been improved through more spontaneous student support. Interview analyses indicate that students favor learning via PBL, but some students suggest that embedding teacher-directed lessons within a PBL unit would benefit the students more than an exclusively PBL-based curriculum. So the overall contribution of this study is to show theoretical justification and the implementation of problem-based learning in developing optimal learning experience for gifted students in the domain of science, since this type of teaching and learning approach is considered most compatible with the characteristics of the gifted students.
- Adams, C. M., & Callahan, C. M. (1995). The Reliability and Validity of a Performance Task for Evaluating Science Process Skills. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 14-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629503900103
- Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview.
- Birch, W. (1986). Towards a Model for Problem-Based Learning. Studies in Higher Education, 11, 73-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075078612331378471
- Fowler, M. (1990). The Diet Cola Test. Science Scope, 13, 32-34.
- Gallagher, S. A., Stepien, W. J., & Rosenthal, H. (1992). The Effects of Problem-Based Learning on Problem Solving. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 195-200. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629203600405
- Maker, C. J. (1996). Curriculum Development and Teaching Strategies for Gifted Learners. Austin, TA: Proed.
- Papert, S. (1991). Situating Constructionism. In I. Harel, & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism: Research reports and essays (pp. 1-11). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
- Passow, H. A. (1982). Differentiated Curricular for the Gifted/Talented. Ventura, CA: Ventura County Superintendent of Schools Office.
- Schulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform. Havard Education Review, 57, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
- Stepien, W., & Gallagher, S. (1993). Problem-Based Learning: As Authentic as it Gets. Educational Leadership (April). 25-28.
- Trefz, R. (1996). Maximizing Your Classroom Time for Authentic Science: Differentiating Science Curriculum for the Gifted. ED 400 188. The Global Summit on Scinece and Science Teaching, San Francisco, CA.
- Van Tassel-Baska, J. (1996). The Development of Talent through Curriculum. Roeper Review, 18, 98-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199509553708
- Van Tassel-Baska, J., Bass, G., Ries, R., Poland, D., & Avery, L. (1998). A national Study of Science Curriculum Effectiveness with High Ability Students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 200-211. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629804200404
- Van Tassel-Baska, J., &Kulieke, M. (1987). The Role of the Community in Developing Scientific Talent. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 115-119. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628703100303