Students’ and Instructors’ Perceptions of Turnitin: A Plagiarism Deterrent?
- 1 College of Arts, Rafik Hariri University, Mechref, Lebanon
Abstract
Academicians consider plagiarism a major threat to academia. To combat that threat, a lot of universities, including the researcher’s university, have been using Turnitin. It is believed that this software is likely to deter students’ plagiarism. The aim of this study is, therefore, to investigate 1) the impact of Turnitin on students’ plagiarism from the perspectives of both students and instructors in a private Lebanese English-speaking university and 2) the reasons that push students to plagiarize. A concurrent mixed-methods design is employed, and different data collection methods are used. The data are analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. Findings reveal that although a lot of the participants perceive Turnitin as a good deterrent to plagiarism, it did not completely inhibit it. The findings also reveal that not all instructors were committed enough to use Turnitin in their courses. Some of the reasons for plagiarism that the participants named are lack of citation skills, laziness, and indifference among students to abide by ethical writing norms. Besides reinforcing the use of Turnitin among all instructors, the researcher recommends that students’ writing and citation skills be improved and that students be helped to become more ethical writers.
- Baker, R. K., Thornton, B., & Adams, M. (2008). An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Turnitin.Com as a Tool for Reducing Plagiarism in Graduate Student Term Papers. College Teaching Methods & Styles Journal, 4, 1-4.
- Batane, T. (2010). Turning to Turnitin to Fight Plagiarism among University Students. Educational Technology & Society, 13, 1-12.
- Bryman, A. (2008). Social Research Methods (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Chao, C. A., Wilhelm, W., & Neureuther, B. D. (2009). A Study of Electronic Detection and Pedagogical Approaches for Reducing Plagiarism. The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, L1, 31-42.
- Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (3rd ed.). US: Sage Publications.
- Graham-Matheson L., & Starr, S. (2013). Is It Cheating or Learning the Craft of Writing? Using Turnitin to Help Students Avoid Plagiarism. Research in Learning Technology, 21, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v21i0.17218
- Heckler, N., Rice, M., & Bryan, H. (2013). Turnitin Systems: A Deterrent to Plagiarism in College Classrooms. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45, 229-248. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2013.10782604
- Koch, K. (2000). Cheating in Schools. CQ Researcher, 10, 747-757.
- Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary (2005). Retrieved from https://www.informationvine.com/index?q=Merriam+Webster+Online+Dictionary% 20&%20qo=relatedSearchNarrow%20&%20o=603081%20&%20l=sem
- Rowell, R., Carroll, J., Morris, E., & Jameson, S. (2009). Educational Resource Review. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 8, 157-166.
- Smith, M., Ghazali, N., & Minhad, S. F. N. (2007). Attitudes towards Plagiarism among Undergraduate Accounting Students: Malaysian Evidence. Asian Review of Accounting, 15, 122-146. https://doi.org/10.1108/13217340710823350
- Stoltenkamp, J., & Kabaka, M. (2014). Turnitin Adoption and Application at a HEI: A Developmental Approach. Creative Education, 5, 1043-1052. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2014.512118
- Turnitin.com (2014). Research Study: Turnitin Effectiveness in U.S. Colleges and Universities. Retrieved from http://www.turnitin.com/en_us/resources
- Turnitin.com (2015a). Shift Perceptions of Plagiarism in a Digital Age. Retrieved from http://www.turnitin.com/en_us/why-turnitin/success/kentucky-wesleyan-college