The approach of integrating art with STEM, also known as STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, and Math), has gained tremendous popularity over the last several years, in large part due its potential to enhance science learning and broaden participation in science ( Vossoughi & Bevan, 2014 ) . However, the field is still nascent with respect to a guiding set of best practices. Unless close attention is paid to using meaningful STEAM practices, including those that support identity development and equity, STEAM is unlikely to fulfill its promise. In this essay, we present a new model for thinking about STEAM, including proposing a set of core STEAM practices that draw on disciplinary practices of art and science. We then provide two examples of STEAM practices in action with respect to activities that integrate biology and chemistry with art. Finally, we offer a set of design recommendations to those wishing to develop impactful STEAM activities. These principles are broadly applicable to science learning in diverse contexts and settings, both in and out of school.
Aikenhead, G. S. (1996). Science Education: Border Crossing into the Subculture of Science. Studies in Science Education, 27, 1-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057269608560077
Aikenhead, G. S. (2001). Students’ Ease in Crossing Cultural Borders into School Science. Science Education, 85, 180-188. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200103)85:2 3.0.CO;2-1
Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2012). Science Aspirations, Capital, and Family Habitus How Families Shape Children’s Engagement and Identification with Science. American Educational Research Journal, 49, 881-908. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831211433290
Baram-Tsabari, A., & Yarden, A. (2010). Quantifying the Gender Gap in Science Interests. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 523-550. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9194-7
Basu, S. J., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2007). Developing a Sustained Interest in Science among Urban Minority Youth. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 466-489. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20143
Bell, P., Tzou, C., Bricker, L., & Baines, A. D. (2012). Learning in Diversities of Structures of Social Practice: Accounting for How, Why and Where People Learn Science. Human Development, 55, 269-284. https://doi.org/10.1159/000345315
Brahms, L. J. (2014). Making as a Learning Process: Identifying and Supporting Family Learning in Informal Settings. Doctoral Dissertation, Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh.
Brickhouse, N. W., & Potter, J. T. (2001). Young Women’s Scientific Identity Formation in an Urban Context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 965-980. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1041
Burton, J. (2009). Creative Intelligence, Creative Practice: Lowenfeld Redux. Studies in Art Education, 50, 323-337.
Carlone, H., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the Science Experiences of Successful Women of Color: Science Identity as an Analytic Lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 1187-1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237
Fulton, L. A., & Simpson-Steele, J. (2016). Reconciling the Divide: Common Processes in Science and Arts Education. The STEAM Journal, 2, 3. https://doi.org/10.5642/steam.20160202.03
Henriksen, D. (2014). Full STEAM Ahead: Creativity in Excellent STEM Teaching Practices. The STEAM Journal, 1, 15. https://doi.org/10.5642/steam.20140102.15
Jones, M. G., Howe, A., & Rua, M. J. (2000). Gender Differences in Students’ Experiences, Interests and Attitudes toward Science and Scientists. Science Education, 84, 180-192. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200003)84:2 3.0.CO;2-X
Kahle, J. B., & Meece, J. (1994). Research on Gender Issues in the Classroom. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Science Teaching and Learning (pp. 543-557). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Larson, A., Danielson, J., & Kealy, K. (2017). Colors of Nature Summer Academy Final Evaluation Report.
Lowenfeld, V. (1957). Creative and Mental Growth (3rd ed.). Oxford: Macmillan.
Miller, P. H., Blessing, J. S., & Schwartz, S. (2006). Gender Differences in High-School Students’ Views about Science. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 363-381. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500277664
Mishra, P., & Henriksen, D. (2012). Rethinking Technology & Creativity in the 21st Century: On Being In-Disciplined. TechTrends, 56, 18-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-012-0608-y
Murphy, P., & Hall, K. (2008). Learning and Practice: Agency and Identities. Sage.
Murphy, P., & Whitelegg, E. (2006). Girls in the Physics Classroom: A Review of the Research into the Participation of Girls in Physics. London: Institute of Physics Report.
National Coalition for Core Arts Standards (2014). National Core Arts Standards. http://www.nationalartsstandards.org/
National Research Council of the National Academies (2009). Learning Science in Informal Environments: People, Places, and Pursuits (336 p.). Washington DC: The National Academies Press.
National Science Foundation (2013). Committee on Equal Opportunities in Science and Engineering 2011-2012 Biennial Report to Congress Broadening Participation in America’s STEM Workforce. https://www.nsf.gov/od/oia/activities/ceose/reports/Full_2011-2012_CEOSE_Report_to_Congress_Final_03-04-2014.pdf
Neff, K., Hsieh, Y., & Dejitterat, K. (2005). Self-Compassion, Achievement Goals, and Coping with Academic Failure. Self and Identity, 4, 263-287. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500444000317
Norris, A. (2014). Make-Her-Spaces as Hybrid Places: Designing and Resisting Self- Constructions in Urban Classrooms. Equity & Excellence in Education, 47, 63-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2014.866879
Peppler, K. A. (2013). STEAM-Powered Computing Education: Using E-Textiles to Integrate the Arts and STEM. IEEE Computer, 46, 38-43. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2013.257
Peppler, K., & Hall, T. (2016). The Make-to-Learn Youth Contest: Gaining Youth Perspectives on Learning through Making. In K. Peppler, E. R. Halverson, & Y. B. Kafai (Eds.), Makeology: Makerspaces as Learning Environments (pp. 141-157). New York, NY: Routledge.
Qi, J., Dick, J., & Cole, D. (2016). Paper Electronics with Circuit Stickers. In K. Peppler, E. R. Halverson, & Y. B. Kafai (Eds.), Makeology: Makerspaces as Learning Environments (pp. 207-222). New York, NY: Routledge.
Root-Bernstein, R. S. (2003). The Art of Innovation: Polymaths and the Universality of the Creative Process. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), International Handbook of Innovation (pp. 267-278). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Tomlinson, M. (2013). Education, Work, and Identity: Themes and Perspectives (pp. 107-129). New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic.
Tsurusaki, B. K., Tzou, C., Carsten Conner, L. D., & Guthrie, M. (2017). 5th-7th Grade Girls’ Conceptions of Creativity: Implications for STEAM Education. Creative Education, 8, 255. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2017.82020
Tsurusaki, B. K., Tzou, C., Carsten Conner, L. D., Guthrie, M., & Pompea, S. (2017). Colors of Nature: Art/Science Agency in Intersecting Figured Worlds. San Antonio, TX: National Association of Research in Science Teaching Annual International Conference.
Tzou, C., Conner, L., Guthrie, M., & Pompea, S. (2014). Colors of Nature: Connecting Science and Arts Education to Promote STEM-Related Identity Work in Middle School Girls. In J. L. Polman, E. Kyza, D. K. O’Neill, I. Tabak, W. R. Penuel, A. S. Jurow, K. O’Connor, T. Lee, & L. D’Amico (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences 2014: Learning and Becoming in Practice (Vol. 3, pp. 1555-1556).
Vossoughi, S., & Bevan, B. (2014). Making and Tinkering: A Review of the Literature (pp. 1-55). National Research Council Committee on Out of School Time STEM.
Vossoughi, S., Hooper, P. K., & Escudé, M. (2016). Making through the Lens of Culture and Power: Toward Transformative Visions for Educational Equity. Harvard Educational Review, 86, 206-232. https://doi.org/10.17763/0017-8055.86.2.206
Zabelina, D. L., & Robinson, M. D. (2010). Don’t Be So Hard on Yourself: Self-Compassion Facilitates Creative Originality among Self-Judgmental Individuals. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 288-293. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.503538