The Constructionist Learning Approach in the Digital Age
- 1 School of Education, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
- 2 School of Education, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
Abstract
The article deals with the evolution of the constructionist learning approach from the beginning of the era of information technologies through the digital age. The evolution of constructionism is demonstrated in connection with two associated processes: changes in the human worldview related to the digital shift, and the corresponding transformations in human society. The study examines the evolution of basic constructionist ideas: 1) “microworlds” as “incubators of knowledge”; 2) a child as “the architect of his [or her] intelligent structures”; 3) the computer as “a machine that brings back a natural character to learning”; 4) coding as a “universal learning activity” that enables the study of fundamental scientific ideas. The constructionist ideas are analyzed in the context of today’s digital reality. The main contribution of the study is formulating the changes in classical constructionism as transformations that correspond to worldview components: activating the perception of self; democratization of the mutual interactions with others; virtualization of the conception of reality; integration the subject and object in their interaction with reality.
- Beynon, M. (2016). Mindstorms Revisited: Making New Construals of Seymour Papert’s Legacy. In International Conference EduRobotics 2016 (pp. 3-19). Cham: Springer.
- Blikstein, P. (2013). Gears of Our Childhood: Constructionist Toolkits, Robotics, and Physical Computing, Past and Future. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 173-182). New York: ACM.
- Ess, C. (2012). At the Intersections between Internet Studies and Philosophy: “Who Am I Online?” Philosophy & Technology, 25, 275-284.
- Feurzeig, W. (2010). Toward a Culture of Creativity: A Personal Perspective on Logo’s Early Years and Ongoing Potential. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 15, 257-265.
- Floridi, L. (2011a). A Defence of Constructionism: Philosophy as Conceptual Engineering. Metaphilosophy, 42, 282-304.
- Floridi, L. (2011b). The Construction of Personal Identities Online. Introduction. Minds and Machines (pp. 1-3). Berlin: Springer.
- Floridi, L. (2014). The Fourth Revolution: How the Infosphere Is Reshaping Human Reality. Oxford: OUP.
- Floridi, L. (2015). The Onlife Manifesto. Berlin: Springer-Verlag GmbH.
- Freud, S. (1955). A Difficulty in the Path of Psycho-Analysis. In the Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, (1917-1919): “An Infantile Neurosis” and Other Works (Vol. XVII, pp. 135-144). London: The Hogarth Press and The Institute of Psycho-Analysis.
- Goldin, A. M. (2009). Education 2.0. A Teacher’s View. Computerra Online: Electronic Journal. http://old.computerra.ru/readitorial/393364/ (in Russian)
- Lukowicz, P., Pentland, S., & Ferscha, A. (2012). From Context Awareness to Socially Aware Computing. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 11, 32-41.
- Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
- Papert, S. (1990). Perestroika and Epistemological Politics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Epistemology and Learning Group, MIT Media Laboratory.
- Resnick, M. (2012). Reviving Papert’s dream. Educational Technology: The Magazine for Managers of Change in Education, 52, 42-46.
- Rieber, L. P. (2004). Microworlds. Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology, 2, 583-603.