Direct Measurements of Root Canal Length in Primary Anterior Teeth for Educational and Clinical Purposes
- 1 Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- 2 School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- 3 School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- 4 Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- 5 Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- 6 Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- 7 Department of Specific Formation, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Nova Friburgo, Brazil
- 8 Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Abstract
Background: The root canal length (RCL) estimate s is an essential step for total endodontic therapy procedures. The aim of this study was to measure the RCL in a sample of extracted primary anterior teeth and compare the data obtained with the literature for educational and clinical purposes. Materials and methods: Seventy extracted primary anterior upper and lower teeth were selected according to the following inclusion criteria: absence of root resorption and/or internal root canal anatomy complications, and no previous root canal manipulation. The teeth were assigned to six groups: upper central incisors (UCI; n = 15), upper lateral incisors (ULI; n = 13), upper canines (UC; n = 20), lower central incisors (LCI; n = 6), lower lateral incisors (LLI; n = 3), and lower canines (LC; n = 13). RCL was measured by the direct method after insertion of a #15 K-file with a silicone stopper in the root canal until the root apex and measuring with a millimetre rule. Results: Mean RCL values (mm) obtained were UCI = 14.33 ± 1.69; ULI = 14.00 ± 1.63; UC = 16.07 ± 2.43; LCI = 15.41 ± 3.20; LLI = 15.00 ± 1.73; and LC = 16.38 ± 1.51. Conclusions: The RCL direct measurement method and the results obtained were in accordance with the literature reports and can be useful for educational purposes aiming at knowledge of dental anatomy and the clinical determination of root canal treatment viability and treatment of primary teeth, as RCL is one of the parameters for the indication/contra-indication of this therapy.
- AAPD (2015). Guideline on Pulp Therapy for Primary and Immature Permanent Teeth. Pediatric Dentistry, 37, 244-252.
- Ahmad, I. A., & Pani, S. C. (2015). Accuracy of Electronic Apex Locators in Primary Teeth: A Meta-Analysis. International Endodontic Journal, 48, 298-307. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12315
- Barcelos, R., Tannure, P. N., Gleiser, R. et al. (2012). The Influence of Smear Layer Removal on Primary Tooth Pulpectomy Outcome: A 24-Month, Double-Blind, Randomized, and Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluation. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 22, 369-381. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2011.01210.x
- Barker, B. C., Parsons, K. C., Williams, G. L., & Mills, P. R. (1975). Anatomy of Root Canals: IV Deciduous Teeth. Australian Dental Journal, 20, 101-106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1975.tb04337.x
- Basso, M. D., Jeremias, F., Cordeiro, R. C. L., & Santos-Pinto, L. (2015). Digital Radiography for Determination of Primary Tooth Length: in Vivo and ex Vivo Studies. Scientific World Journal, 2015, Article ID: 939045. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/939045
- Chougule, R. B., Padmanabhan, M. Y., & Mandal, M. S. (2012). A Comparative Evaluation of Root Canal Length Measurement Techniques in Primary Teeth. Pediatric Dentistry, 34, 53-56.
- Haffner, C., Folcwaczny, M., Galler, K., & Hicckel, R. (2005). Accuracy of Electronic Apex Locators in Comparison to Actual Length—An in Vivo Study. Journal of Dental Research, 33, 353-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2004.11.017
- Hagen, M., Cooke, B. K., & Wright, A. (2017). A Five-Year Review of Enhanced Learning through Integration: Anatomy and Clinical Practice. Creative Education, 8, 1774-1781. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2017.811121
- Kottor, J., Albuquerque, D., Velmurugan, N., & Kuruvilla, J. (2013). Root Anatomy and Root Canal Configuration of Human Mandibular Premolars: A Systematic Review. Anatomy Research International, 2013, 14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/254250
- Krishnan, I. S., & Sreedharan, S. (2012). A Comparative Evaluation of Electronic and Radiographic Determination of Root Canal Length in Primary Teeth: An in Vitro Study. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry, 3, 416-420. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-237X.107430
- Mello-Moura, A. C. V., Moura-Netto, C., Araki, A. T. et al. (2010). Ex Vivo Performance of Five Methods for Root Canal Length Determination in Primary Anterior Teeth. International Endodontic Journal, 43, 142-147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2009.01667.x