Using Collaborative Agent-Based Computer Modeling to Explore Tri-Trophic Cascades with Elementary School Science Students
- 1 Department of Curriculum and Instruction, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA
- 2 Department of Curriculum and Instruction, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA
- 3 Department of Curriculum and Instruction, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA
- 4 University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth, Dartmouth, USA
Abstract
This paper investigates an in-service teacher and her student’s abilities to utilize, implement, and enact a participatory agent-based modeling program, developed as part of the group-based cloud computing (GbCC) for STEM Education Project funded by the National Science Foundation. In this first cycle of design-based implementation research with an in-service teacher and her 300 students, we examine student participatory learning and teacher experience. By implementing models with teachers, we intend to 1 ) improve iteratively the GbCC learning technologies and 2 ) develop more informed and aligned pedagogies for teaching in socially mediated and generative learning environments.
- Collins, A. (1990). Toward a Design Science of Education. Technical Report No. 1. New York, NY: Center for Technology in Education.
- Fishman, B. J., Penuel, W. R., Allen, A.-R., Cheng, B. H., & Sabelli, N. (2013). Design-Based Implementation Research: An Emerging Model for Transforming the Relationship of Research and Practice. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 112, 136-156.
- How Wolves Change Rivers (2014). https://sustainablehuman.tv/remix/how-wolves-change-rivers
- Next Generation Science Standards Lead States (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, by States. Washington DC: The National Academies Press.
- Petrosino, A. J., & Stroup, W. M. (2017). Group-Based Cloud Computing for STEM Education. Columbus: Poster at the Annual Convention of the American Society of Engineering Education. https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/78/papers/19018/view
- Philip, T., & Garcia, A. (2013). The Importance of Still Teaching the iGeneration: New Technologies and the Centrality of Pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 83, 300-319. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.83.2.w221368g1554u158
- Ripple, W. J., & Beschata, R. L. (2012). Trophic Cascades in Yellowstone: The First 15 Years after Wolf Reintroduction. Biological Conservation, 145, 205-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.11.005
- Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Achér, A., Fortus, D., Krajcik, J. et al. (2009). Developing a Learning Progression for Scientific Modeling: Making Scientific Modeling Accessible and Meaningful for Learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 632-654. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20311
- Stroup, W. M., Ares, N., & Hurford, A. C. (2004). A Taxonomy of Generative Activity Design Supported by Next-Generation Classroom Networks. Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of Psychology in Mathematics Education-North America, Ontario, 837-846.
- Stroup, W. M., Ares, N., Lesh, R., & Hurford, A. (2007). Diversity by Design: Generativity in Next-Generation Classroom Networks. In R. Lesh, E. Hamilton, & J. J. Kaput (Eds.), Models and Modeling as Foundations for the Future in Mathematics Education (pp. 367-393). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Wells, G. (1993). Reevaluating the IRF Sequence: A Proposal for the Articulation of Theories of Activity and Discourse for the Analysis of Teaching and Learning in the Classroom. Linguistics and Education, 5, 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(05)80001-4