Teaching Training in Medical Students as an Elective Subject
- 1 Faculty of Medicine, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
- 2 Faculty of Medicine, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
- 3 Faculty of Medicine, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
- 4 University of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, IL,
- 5 Faculty of Medicine, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico
Abstract
Background: One of the most significant variables in the learning process is the quality and performance of educators. Therefore, it is necessary to teach future physicians who are considering a career in academia since they often do not have extensive formal training in teaching. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a course developed by the Faculty of Medicine at UNAM that provided medical students with teaching skills. Methods: Eleven (11) students were evaluated at the beginning and two years after successful completion of the course titled Introduction to teaching in the biomedical area . Student acquisition of procedural curricular contents (PCC) was assessed using a pedagogical referent tool that was applied at the beginning and end of the course. Their mastering of behavioral curricular contents (BCC) was evaluated using a rubric focusing on the human qualities of pedagogical leadership and teaching skills. The means of each assessment before and at the completion of the course were compared using T-tests. Results: The results showed that the preference for traditional referents decreased with regards to strategies of “assessment” (36% to 27%), “teacher-student relationship” (100% to 73%), and “planning” (from 27% to 9%); while the preference for the educational technology referent increased in the “learning” area (82% to 91%). With regards to assessment of didactic planning, the general performance was high (22 points), standing out “didactic sequence”. Out of the dimensions with low performance stand out “teamwork” and “diagnostic assessment”. In the assessment of Behavioral Curricular Contents (BCC), a perception with initial high scores in the intrinsic motivation and teaching performance/pedagogical qualities of a leader was identified without finding significant differences after the course (p = 0.18 and 0.73, respectively). Conclusion: The observations in this study demonstrated that medical students had a preference for alternative and educational technology referents at the end of the course that taught them to become academic instructors. The former preference is ideal for the creation of a study plan oriented toward the development of competencies-based courses.
- Bhutta, Z. A., Chen, L., Cohen, J., Crisp, N., Evans, T., & Fineberg, H. (2010). Education of Health Professionals for the 21st Century: A Global Independent Commission. The Lancet, 375, 1137-1138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60450-3
- Bolívar, B. A. (2010). How Does a Pedagogical and Distributed Leadership Improve Academic Achievement? Magis. International Journal of Research in Education, 3, 79-106.
- Bozu, Z. (2009). The New University Teaching Staff and Their Professional Induction Process. Magis. International Journal of Research in Education, 2, 317-328.
- Bozu, Z. (2010). Young University Professors in the Current Context of University Education. Keys and Controversies. Iberoamerican Journal of Education, 51, 1-15.
- Epstein, R. (2007). Assessment in Medical Education. The New England Journal of Medicine, 356,387-396. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra054784
- Esquivias, S., & González, C. A. (2005). The Teacher as a Student: Thinking, Attitudes and Academic Performance. Interuniversity Electronic Journal of Teacher Training, 8, 23-32.
- González, T. M. (2003). Keys to Encourage Teachers’ Motivation in the Face of Current Educational Challenges. Estudios Sobre Educación, 5, 61-83.
- Macneill, N., Cavanagh, R. F., & Silcox, S. (2005). Pedagogic Leadership: Refocusing on Learning and Teaching. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning, 9.
- Male, T., & Palaiologou, I. (2012). Learning-Centred Leadership or Pedagogical Leadership? An Alternative Approach to Leadership in Education Contexts. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 15, 107-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2011.617839
- Malini, R. Y., & Andrade, H. (2010). A Review of Rubric Use in Higher Education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 435-448. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930902862859
- Martínez, G. A., Ferrés, G. A., & Gutiérrez, D. S. (2001). Referentes pedagógicos y estrategias de ensenanza delos profesores de la Maestría en Ciencia Bioquímicas de la UNAM. Revista Anuies, 4, 54-59.
- Medina, R. A., & Gómez, D. R. M. (2014). Pedagogical Leadership: Skills Needed to Develop an Improvement Program in a Secondary School. Educational Perspective Teacher Training, 53, 91-113.
- Pedroza, A. V., & Infante, T. D. (2010). A Perspective on the Attitudes and Duties of the Teachers in the School Classroom. Journal of Education and Development, 14, 53-58.