Culture in L2/Ln Sign Language Pedagogy
- 1 Lamar University, Beaumont, TX, USA
- 2 Metro School for the Deaf, St. Paul, MN, USA
Abstract
There are diverse reasons for learning a sign language, including taking courses for personal use versus taking courses for formal academic credit. Those learning a sign language for personal reasons include people who interact with deaf people; they may have a deaf child or work in a deaf-hearing environment. These personal users require different curriculums and frequently have different goals in terms of their final levels of proficiency. Learning a sign language as a foreign, or world, language tends to follow the long-established standards for any foreign language learner. For sign languages, multiple projects are ongoing to create more effective curriculums to achieve the “5Cs” listed within the US accrediting standards and the “Can Dos” in the European standards. There is the need for additional research in sign language curriculum development as well as pedagogy for the most effective transmission of sign language skills and their associated cultural components. Future efforts to develop curriculum for personal users as well as those in formal academic settings will provide highly skilled sign language instructors as well as interpreters .
- Brooks, N. (1968). Teaching Culture in the Foreign Language Classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 1, 204-217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1968.tb00135.x
- Byram, M., & Feng, A. (2004). Culture and Language Learning: Teaching, Research, and Scholarship. Language Teaching, 37, 149-168. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444804002289
- Byram, M., Gribkova, B., & Starkey, H. (2002). Developing the Intercultural Dimension in Language Teaching. A Practical Introduction for Teachers. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
- Holcomb, T. K. (2013). Introduction to American Deaf Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Jurasek, R. (1995). Using Ethnography to Bridge the Gap between Study Abroad and Theon-Campus Language and Culture Curriculum. In C. Kramsch (Ed.), Redefining the Boundaries of Language Study (pp. 221-251). Boston, MA: Heinle&Heinle.
- Leeson, L., van den Bogaerde, B., Rathmann, C., & Haug, T. (2016). Sign Languages and the Common European Framework of Reference: Common Reference Level Descriptors. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=8&ved=0ahUKEwi0uv2 _lcjWAhVpiFQKHRt0BuUQFghBMAc&url= http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ecml.at%2FPortals%2F1%2Fmtp4%2Fprosign%2Fdocuments%2 FCommon-Reference-Level-Descriptors-EN.pdf&usg=AFQjCNEubw 3Lagf1CB7BFK6nVmL7oEjuYw
- Monikowski, C., & Peterson, R. (2013). Service Learning in Interpreting Education: Living and Learning. In M. Marschark, R. Peterson, & E. A. Winston (Eds.), Interpreting Education: From Research to Practice (pp. 188-207). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Paige, R. M., Jorstad, H., Siaya, L., Klein, F., & Colby, J. (2000). Culture Learning in Language Education: A Review of the Literature. http://carla.acad.umn.edu/IS-litreview/litreview.html
- Phillips, J. K., & Abbott, M. (2011). A Decade of Foreign Language Standards: Impact, Influence, and Future Directions. Report of Grant Project.
- Quinto-Pozos, D. (2011). Teaching American Sign Language to hearing adult learners. AnnualReview of Applied Linguistics, 31, 137-158. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000195
- Rosen, R. S. (2010). American Sign Language Curricula: A Review. Sign Language Studies, 10, 348-381. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.0.0050
- Shores, P. A., Hohenstein, C., & Keller, J. (2014). Deaf and Non-Deaf Research Collaboration on Swiss German Sign Language (DSGS) Interpreter Training in Switzerland. Translation & Interpreting, 6, 47-59.