Diagnosis of Sustainability in the Food Engineering Creation Program of the Polytechnic University of the State of Carchi (UPEC) in the Substantive Function “Teaching”
- 1 Food Engineering Career, Carchi State Polytechnic University, Tulcán, Ecuador
- 2 Agricultural Career, Carchi State Polytechnic University, Tulcán, Ecuador
- 3 Computer Career, Carchi State Polytechnic University, Tulcán, Ecuador
- 4 Agricultural Career, Carchi State Polytechnic University, Tulcán, Ecuador
- 5 Department of Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- 6 Food Engineering Career, Carchi State Polytechnic University, Tulcán, Ecuador
- 7 Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Carrera de Medicina Veterinaria, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito, Ecuador
Abstract
As the world population grows, technologies are developed to improve food industrialization processes that are characterized by using large amounts of resources that modify social, economic, political and environmental systems that are the main components of sustainability. The incorporation of sustainability in Higher Education Institutions in Latin America is a relatively new process; it initiates with the implementation of study programs that promote a society responsible with the environment. The objective of this investigation was to diagnose the Creation Program of Food Engineering of the Polytechnic University of the State of Carchi (UPEC) in the substantive function “Teaching” to know the current situation in relation to sustainability. The main contribution of this research was designing a new methodology for evaluation of sustainability, taking the Sustainable Development Objectives from UN 2015 as a reference for calculating the percentage of sustainability contained in the curriculum. There were no references to similar diagnosis made in other universities in the world that could serve as reference for the present investigation. The percentage of hours with sustainability content was calculated as 24.15% considering teaching hours that showed sustainability contents, this was the Overall Sustainability Percentage. Human related courses presented greater percentage of sustainability. The most common Sustainable Development Objective was “Health and wellbeing”. The presence of the 17 UN Sustainable Development Objectives is evident but below 50%, presenting a possibility of improvement. There is a fertile ground for the incorporation of the sustainability approach in the career of Food Engineering in the UPEC, which with only four years of creation; it is a suitable institutional time to consolidate a commitment to food production, conservation and industrialization in a sustainable way, with the urgency demanded by today situation.
- Angiolini, S. (2015). La sustentabilidad en el currículum del arquitecto en la Universidad Pública Argentina. Estoa, 4, 69-76. https://doi.org/10.18537/est.v004.n007.08
- Bermúdez, O. M. (2016). Educación Ambiental, Valores y Prácticas Sustentables. Una Guía para Educadores del siglo XXI. Bogotá: Colombia. IDEAS 26.
- Broom, D. M. (2004). Future Food Animal Production Efficiency and Acceptability. In Z. H. Shamsuddin (Ed.), Agriculture Congress: Innovation towards Modernized Agriculture (pp. 17-21). Serdang: University Putra Malaysia.
- Castellacci, F. (2004). How Does Innovation Differ Across Sectors in Europe? Evidence from the CIS-SIEPI Database. Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture. Workingpaper, núm. 4, Oslo: University of Oslo.
- Challenger, A. (1998). Utilización y conservación de los ecosistemas terrestres de México. Pasado, Presente y Futuro. México DF: CONABIO, Instituto de Biología, UNAM y Sierra Madre AC.
- Elo, S., Kaariainen, M., Kanste, O., Polkki, T., Utriainen, K., & Kyngas, H. (2014). Qualitative Content Analysis: A Focus on Trustworthiness. SAGE Open, 4, Issue 1. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014522633
- Enkerlin, E. C., Cano, G., Garza, R. A., & Vogel, E. (1997). Ciencia Ambiental y Desarrollo Sostenible. México D.F: International Thomson Editores.
- Fraser, D. (2001). The “New Perception” of Animal Agriculture: Legless Cows, Featherless Chickens, and a Need for Genuine Analysis. Journal of Animal Science, 79, 634-641. https://doi.org/10.2527/2001.793634x
- Gamborg, C., & Sandoe, P. (2005). Sustainability in Farm Animal Breeding: A Review. Livestock Production Science, 92, 221-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.08.010
- González, E. J., Meira-Cartea, P. A., & Martínez-Fernández, C. N. (2015). Sustentabilidad y Universidad: Retos, ritos y posibles rutas. Revista de la Educación Superior, 44, 69-93.
- Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (2013). La importancia de la preservación en la biodiversidad. https://inta.gob.ar/noticias/la-importancia-de-la-preservacion-en-la-biodiversidad
- Kjarnes, U. (2007). Ethics and Action: A Relational Perspective on Food Trends and Consumer Concerns. In Sustainable Food Production and Ethics: Preprints of the 7th Congress of the European Society for Agricultural and Food Ethics (pp. 43-48). Vienna: Wageningen Academic Publishers.