External Representations in the Teaching and Learning of Introductory Chemistry
- 1
- 2
Abstract
This manuscript describes the role that external representations, such as diagrams and sketches, can play in organizing and learning concepts presented in a one-semester chemistry course (general, organic and biochemistry) designed for nursing students. Although external representations are typically found in chemistry textbooks and instructor-drawn notes, students are usually not taught or prompted to use various types of external representations to promote learning. Representations created by an instructor and a student are discussed to highlight effective ways to foster student participation in creating various diagrams. In addition, a student provides a perspective on the educational value of creating external representations and the roles of visual thinking and creativity in learning introductory chemistry. Although the model for this approach has been an introductory chemistry course, this approach can be widely applied across disciplines.
- Coil, D., Wenderoth, M. P., Cunningham, M., & Dirks, C. (2010). Teaching the process of science: faculty perceptions and an effective methodology. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 9, 524-535. doi:10.1187/cbe.10-01-0005
- Cooper, M. M., & Sandi-Urena, S. (2009). Design and validation of an instrument to assess metacognitive skillfulness in chemistry problem solving. Journal of Chemical Education, 86, 240-245. doi:10.1021/ed086p240
- Derting, T. D., & Cox, J. R. (2008). Using a tablet PC to enhance student engagement and learning in an introductory organic chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 85, 1638-1643. doi:10.1021/ed085p1638
- Derting, T. L., & Ebert-May, D. (2010). Learner-centered inquiry in undergraduate biology: Positive relationships with long-term student achievement. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 9, 462-472. doi:10.1187/cbe.10-02-0011
- Deslauriers, L., Schelew, E., & Wieman, C. (2011). Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science, 332, 862-864. doi:10.1126/science.1201783
- Gilbert, J. K. (2005). Visualization: A metacognitive skill in science and sience education. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Visualization in Science Education (Vol. 1, pp. 9-27). Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/1-4020-3613-2_2
- Gobert, J. D., & Clement, J. J. (1999). Effects of student-generated diagrams versus student-generated summaries on conceptual understanding of casual and dynamic knowledge in plate tectonics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 39-53. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199901)36:1 3.0.CO;2-I
- Haak, D., HilleRisLambers, J., Pitre, E., & Freeman, S. (2011). Increased structure and active learning reduce the achievement gap in introductory biology. Science, 332, 1213-1216. doi:10.1126/science.1204820
- Hall, V. C., Bailey, J., & Tillman, C. (1997). Can student-generated illustrations be worth ten thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 677-681. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.4.677
- Larkin, J. H., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11, 65-99. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6708.1987.tb00863.x
- Lee, W. T., & Jabot, M. E. (2011). Incorporating active learning techniques into a genetics class. Journal of College Science Teaching, 40, 94-100.
- Mathewson, J. H. (1999). Visual-spatial thinking: An aspect of science overlooked by educators. Science Education, 83, 33-54. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199901)83:1 3.0.CO;2-Z