Needs Analysis of Chinese Chemical Engineering and Technology Undergraduate Students in Yangtze University in English for Specific Purposes
- 1 School of Foreign Studies, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China
- 2 School of Foreign Studies, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, China
Abstract
English for Specific Purposes (or ESP) is as a part of college English. This paper aims to investigate Chinese chemical engineering and technology undergraduate students’ needs in English for Specific Purposes (ESP). Eighty first-year chemical engineering and technology undergraduate students from Yangtze university as volunteer participates were in this study to answer the questionnaires about their needs in ESP and 60 volunteer participants were interviewed to provide their responses on ESP. All the data from questionnaires students answered and the interviews were collected. All the data were analyzed by SPSS 17. The results showed that : 1) The chemical engineering and technology undergraduate students’ level of proficiency in the language skills was medium; 2) The students ranked the language skills (listening and speaking) as the most important language skills; 3) Understanding instructions, following question/answer sessions, answering the questions, reading field - related textbooks, instructions for assignments, taking notes in lectures were more emphasized by the students in ESP classes; 4) The students had positive responses on the needs in ESP. Forty eight (80%) students thought that ESP would be better for their English learning and major study and thirty two (53.3%) students thought reading as the most important language skill ESP. Findings in the present study could be provided as implications for course designers and recommendations for future studies.
- Al-Otibi, A. M. (1994). Identifying the English Communication Needs of Kuwaiti Student Soldiers at the Military Institute in Kuwait. Unpublished Ph.D Thesis. UK: Cardiff University College.
- Alsamadani, H. A. (2017). Needs Analysis in ESP Context: Saudi Engineering Students as a Case Study. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 8, 58-68. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.8n.6p.58
- Brindley, G. (1989). The Role of Needs Analysis in Adult ESL Programme Design. In R. Johnson (Ed.), The Second Language Curriculum (pp. 43-78). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Dudley-Evans, T., & ST John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for Specific Purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Eslami, Z. R. (2010). Teachers’ Voice vs. Students’ Voice: A Needs Analysis Approach to English for Academic Purposes (EAP) in Iran. English Language Teaching, 3, 3-11. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v3n1p3
- Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733031
- Jordan, R. R. (1997). English for Academic Purposes: A Guide and Resources Book for Teachers. London, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733062
- Li, J. (2014). Needs Analysis of Business English Undergraduates and the Implications to Business English Curriculum Design. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 5, 33-37.
- Luo, N., & Chen, C. M. (2012). EAP Needs Analysis of Graduate Students of Science and Technology from the Mentors’ Perspective. Contemporary Foreign Languages Studies, 5, 38-42.
- Mohammed, S. A. H. (2016). Investigating the Application of Needs Analysis on EAP Business Administration Materials. English Language Teaching, 9, 74-79. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n3p74
- Mohammed, A. S. E., & Nur, H. S. M. (2018). Needs Analysis in English for Academic Purposes: The Case of Teaching Assistants at the University of Khartoum. HOW, 25, 49-68. https://doi.org/10.19183/how.25.2.409
- Nafissi, Z., Rezaeipanah, F., & Monsefi, R. (2017). Pre and Post Test Evaluations of Students in the Needs-AnalysisBased EAP Course at Undergraduate Level. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 8, 207-214. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.8n.1p.207
- Rahman, M. (2015). English for Specific Purposes (ESP): A Holistic Review. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 3, 24-31.