Research on the Application of AHP and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation of Teaching Quality in Basic Mathematics Classroom
- 1 School of Mathematical Sciences, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China
- 2 School of Mathematical Sciences, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China
- 3 School of Mathematical Sciences, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China
- 4 Liaocheng Vocational and Technical College, Liaocheng, China
Abstract
With the development and innovation of basic mathematics education, the classroom teaching quality has become a hot spot of basic mathematics education curriculum and teaching reform. The high classroom teaching quality can comprehensively and deeply reflect the teaching level of teachers, improv e the level of students’ mathematical key competencies, and realiz e the fast improvement of mathematics learning process. Therefore , the evaluation of it has become not only important but necessary. As a result, we argue that evaluation indicator system of teaching quality should be well researched. Based on the multi-layered and fuzzy-paste nature of the evaluation problem of classroom teaching quality, the evaluation model of classroom teaching quality is tried to construct. By using analytic hierarchy process, the weight of each indicator is determined, and the teaching quality is determined by using the model of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. The evaluation method improves the reliability and objectivity of the evaluation results, promoting students’ efficient learning of mathematics and teaching level.
- Armstrong, M., & Baron, A. (1998). Performance Management. London: The Cromwell Press.
- Dong, G. Y., & Qi, Y. C. (2017). Research on the Application of AHP in the Evaluation of Teaching Quality in Colleges. Chinese Adult Education, No. 9, 53-56.
- Fu, H. L., & Jia, G. J. (2009). Introduction to Mathematical Thinking Method. Jinan: Shandong Education Press.
- Gao, Q., & Fu, H. (2017). A Comprehensive Study on the Reason of Low Enthusiasm for Master Students Majored in Basic Mathematics. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 5, 216-226. https://doi.org/jss.2017.54019
- Li, J. Y. (2011). Research and Thinking on the Evaluation Standard of Mathematics Teaching. Journal of Mathematics Education, 5, 24-27.
- McDermott, L. C., & Shaffer, P. S. (1992). Research as a Guide for Curriculum Development: An Example from Introductory Electricity. Part I: Investigation of Student Understanding. American Journal of Physics, 60, 994-1003. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.17003
- Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw: Hill International Book Company.
- Wosilait, K., Heron, P. L., Shaffer, P. S., & McDermott, L. C. (1998). Development and Assessment of a Research-Based Tutorial on Light and Shadow. American Journal of Physics, 66, 906-913. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18988
- Yu, Z. G. (2008). Application of Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method in Quality Evaluation of Mathematics Experiment Teaching in Colleges. Laboratory Research and Exploration, 28, 110-112.
- Zhang, F. R., & Ma, Q. M. (2013). The Application of AHP Model and Fuzzy Judgment in Evaluation of Classroom Teaching Quality. Normal University Science Journal, 33, 18-20.