Towards Answering, <i>What Do We Know about Elementary Pre-Service Teachers’ Noticing Skills in Science</i>? A Pre-Requisite to Prepare Them to Teach Responsively in Science Classrooms — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Towards Answering, <i>What Do We Know about Elementary Pre-Service Teachers’ Noticing Skills in Science</i>? A Pre-Requisite to Prepare Them to Teach Responsively in Science Classrooms
Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Centre of Science and Math in Context, University of Massachusetts, Boston, USA
,
Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Centre of Science and Math in Context, University of Massachusetts, Boston, USA
1 Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Centre of Science and Math in Context, University of Massachusetts, Boston, USA
2 Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Centre of Science and Math in Context, University of Massachusetts, Boston, USA
A teachers’ ability to notice and analyse the substance of student thinking, is an important feature of effective science teaching. To prepare new science teachers to attend to students’ thinking, it is important for teacher educators to first understand what novice teachers notice in science classrooms , what they associate with the idea of noticing and in what ways their noticing skills can progress. To study novice teachers’ noticing abilities, our study employs two different assessment tools, an open noticing assignment and a focused noticing task as pre and post assessments during a semester long science methods course. We report on a variety of noticing themes that highlight a wide variation in what the novice teachers perceive as important to notice in science classrooms. Pre-post analysis of these noticing themes suggests a shift in noticing from general classroom aspects towards noticing science specific aspects as science topics or concepts being discussed and students’ ideas about those. Using a mixed methods analysis lens for both tools, we present various sophistication levels of teacher noticing. These levels not just serve as an indicator of the PSTs’ noticing skills but also as a framework for educators to help PSTs develop responsive teaching strategies in elementary science classrooms.
KeywordsTeacher Noticing in SciencePre-Service Teacher EducationElementary Science EducationResponsive Teaching in Science
Ball, D. L. (2011). Foreword. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics Teacher Noticing: Seeing Through Teachers’ Eyes (pp. 20-22). New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cppeds.2010.10.005
Ball, D. L., Thames, M., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content Knowledge for Teaching: What Makes It Special? Journal of Teacher Education, 29, 389-407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
Benedict-Chambers, A., & Aram, R. (2017). Tools for Teacher Noticing: Helping Preservice Teachers Notice and Analyze Student Thinking and Scientific Practice Use. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28, 294-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2017.1302730
Berland, L. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2009). Making Sense of Argumentation and Explanation. Science Education, 93, 26-55. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20286
Black, P. J., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting It into Practice. London: Open University Press.
Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M. E. (2008). Video as a Tool for Fostering Productive Discussions in Mathematics Professional Development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 417-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.012
Bryan, L. A. (2003). Nestedness of Beliefs: Examining a Prospective Elementary Teacher’s Belief System about Science Teaching and Learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 835-868. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10113
Coffey, J. E., Hammer, D., Levin, D. M., & Grant, T. (2011). The Missing Disciplinary Substance of Formative Assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 1109-1136. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20440
Covitt, B. A., Caplan, B. Z., & Cano, A. (2018). Teachers’ Use of Learning Progression Based Formative Assessment In water Instruction. Applied Measurement in Education, 31, 128-142.
Dalvi, T., & Wendell, K. (2017). Using Student Video Cases to Assess Pre-service Elementary Teachers’ Engineering Teaching Responsiveness. Research in Science Education, 47, 1101-1125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9547-5
Eick, C. J., & Reed, C. J. (2002). What Makes an Inquiry-Oriented Science Teacher? The Influence of Learning Histories on Student Teacher Role Identity and Practice. Science Education, 86, 401-416. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10020
Furtak, E. M. (2012). Linking a Learning Progression for Natural Selection to Teachers’ Enactment of Formative Assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 1181-1210.
Furtak, E. M., & Heredia, S. (2014). Exploring the Influence of Learning Progressions in two Teacher Communities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51, 982-1020. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.v51.8
Hammer, D. (1997). Discovery Learning and Discovery Teaching. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 485-529. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1504_2
Hammer, D., Goldberg, F., & Fargason, S. (2012). Responsive Teaching and the Beginnings of Energy in a Third Grade Classroom. Review of Science, Mathematics, and ICT Education, 6, 51-72.
Jaber, L. Z. (2014). Affective Dynamics of Students’ Disciplinary Engagement in Science. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Boston, MA: Tufts University.
Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional Noticing of Children’s Mathematical Thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41, 169-202.
Knaggs, C. M., & Sondergeld, T. A. (2015). Science as a Learner and as a Teacher: Measuring Science Self-Efficacy of Elementary Preservice Teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 115, 117-128. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12110
Lampert, M., Franke, M. L., Kazemi, E., Ghousseini, H., Turrou, A. C., Beasley, H., Crowe, K. et al. (2013). Keeping It Complex: Using Rehearsals to Support Novice Teacher Learning of Ambitious Teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 64, 226-243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112473837
Levin, D. M., Hammer, D, Elby, A., & Coffey, J. E. (2012). Becoming a Responsive Science Teacher: Focusing on Student Thinking in Secondary Science. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
Levin, D. M., Hammer, D., & Coffey, J. E. (2009). Novice Teachers’ Attention to Student Thinking. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 142-154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108330245
Luna, M. J., Selmer, S. J., & Rye, J. A. (2018). Teachers’ Noticing of Students’ Thinking in Science through Classroom Artifacts: In What Ways Are Science and Engineering Practices Evident? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29, 148-172.
Maskiewicz, A. C., & Winters, V. A. (2012). Understanding the Co-Construction of Inquiry Practices: A Case Study of a Responsive Teaching Environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 429-464. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21007
McNeill, K. L. (2009). Teachers’ Use of Curriculum to Support Students in Writing Scientific Arguments to Explain Phenomena. Science Education, 93, 233-268. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20294
Mitchell, R. N., & Marin, K. A. (2015). Examining the Use of a Structured Analysis Framework to Support Prospective Teacher Noticing. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18, 551-575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-014-9294-3
NGSS Lead States (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, by States. http://www.nap.edu/catalog/18290/next-generation-science-standards-for-states-by-states
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ Beliefs and Educational Research: Cleaning up a Messy Construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307-332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
Robertson, A., Scherr, R., & Hammer, D. (2015). Responsive Teaching in Science. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315689302
Schwarz, C. V., Passmore, C., & Reiser, B. J. (2017). Helping Students Make Sense of the World Using Next Generation Science and Engineering Practices. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
Sherin, M. G. (2001). Developing a Professional Vision of Classroom Events. In T. Wood, B. S. Nelson, & J. Warfield (Eds.), Beyond Classical Pedagogy: Teaching Elementary School Mathematics (pp. 75-93). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sherin, M. G. (2007). The Development of Teachers’ Professional Vision in Video Clubs. In R. Goldman, R. Pea, B. Barron, & S. Derry (Eds.), Video Research in the Learning Sciences (pp. 383-395). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sherin, M. G., & Han, S. Y. (2004). Teacher Learning in the Context of a Video Club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 163-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.08.001
Sherin, M. G., & Van Es, E. A. (2009). Effects of Video Club Participation on Teachers’ Professional Vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60, 20-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108328155
Star, J. R., & Strickland, S. K. (2008). Learning to Observe: Using Video to Improve Preservice Mathematics Teachers’ Ability to Notice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 107-125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-007-9063-7
Talanquer, V., Tomanek, D., & Novodvorsky, I. (2013). Assessing Students’ Understanding of Inquiry: What Do Prospective Science Teachers Notice? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 189-208.
Van Es, E. A. (2012). Examining the Development of a Teacher Learning Community: The Case of a Video Club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 182-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.09.005
Van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to Notice: Scaffolding New Teachers’ Interpretations of Classroom Interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10, 571-596.
Van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics Teachers’ “Learning to Notice” in the Context of a Video Club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 244-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.005
Van Es, E. A., Cashen, M., Barnhart, T., & Auger, A. (2017). Learning to Notice Mathematics Instruction: Using Video to Develop Preservice Teachers’ Vision of Ambitions Pedagogy. Cognition and Instruction, 35, 1-23.
Van Es, E., & Barnhart, T. (2015). Studying Teacher Noticing: Examining the Relationship among Pre-Service Science Teachers’ Ability to Attend, Analyze and Respond to Student Thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 83-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.09.005
Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2011). Ambitious Pedagogy by Novice Teachers: Who Benefits from Tool-Supported Collaborative Inquiry into Practice and Why. Teachers College Record, 113, 1311-1360.
Zangori, L., Forbes, C. T., & Biggers, M. (2013). Fostering Student Sensemaking in Elementary Science Learning Environments: Elementary Teachers’ Use of Science Curriculum Materials to Promote Explanation Construction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 989-1017. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21104