Mastery regarding argumentation in science among high school biology students remains elusive. This study argues that argumentation can be explicitly taught and acquired through an explicit instruction revolving around argumentation. A teaching and learning module named as the LAB-MADI Module was developed to provide secondary biology students an environment to practice and acquire argumentation skills from reasoning based on evidence through practical work. An initial draft of the LAB-MADI Module for laboratory investigation was pilot studied in one of the schools with a group of twenty-two (n = 22) Grade 10 students (aged 16 years) from a pure science class taking biology as an examination subject. The results of the pilot study showed that the activities are able to improve students’ argumentation skills.
Abdullah, A., & Francis Peters, R. (2015). Malaysia’s Post-PISA 2012 Direction. International Journal of Culture and History, 1, 15-20. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijch.2015.1.1.003
Akarsu, B., Bayram, K., Slisko, J., & Cruz, A. C. (2013). Understanding Elementary Students’ Argumentation Skills through Discrepant Event “Marbles in the Jar”. International Journal of Scientific Research in Education, 6, 221-232.
Balta, N. (2015). A Systematic Planning for Science Laboratory Instruction: Research-Based Evidence. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11, 957-969. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1366a
Becker, R. E. (2014). Explicit Instruction of Scientific Explanation and Argument in an Undergraduate Introductory Biology Laboratory Course Using the Claim, Evidence and Reasoning Framework. PhD Thesis, Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University.
Berland, L. K., & Hammer, D. (2012). Framing for Scientific Argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 68-94. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20446
Cengiz, E., & Ayvaci, H. S. (2017). Analysing the Feedback that Secondary School Science Teachers Provide for Student Errors That Show Up in Their Lessons. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14, 109-124.
CetIn, P., MetIn, D., & Kaya, E. (2016). A New Approach to Laboratory Applications: Argument-Driven Inquiry. Ahi Evran üniversitesi Kirsehir Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi (KEFAD), 17, 223-243.
Choi, A., Klein, V., & Hershberger, S. (2014). Success, Difficulty, and Instructional Strategy to Enact an Argument-Based Inquiry Approach: Experiences of Elementary Teachers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13, 991-1011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9525-1
Clark, D. B., & Sampson, V. (2007). Personally-Seeded Discussions to Scaffold Online Argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 253-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600560944
Clark, D. B., & Sampson, V. (2008). Assessing Dialogic Argumentation in Online Environments to Relate Structure, Grounds, and Conceptual Quality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 293-321. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20216
Demircioglu, T., & Ucar, S. (2015). Investigating the Effect of Argument-Driven Inquiry in Laboratory Instruction. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15, 267-283. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.1.2324
Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2015). The Systematic Design of Instruction (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the Norms of Scientific Argumentation in Classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3 3.0.CO;2-A
Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science Education. Studies in Science Education, 38, 39-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260208560187
Eisenkraft, A. (2003). Expanding the 5E Model. The Science Teacher, 70, 56-59.
Enderle, P. J., Grooms, J. A., & Williams, K. (2012). The Development of Science Proficiency in High School Chemistry Students Engaged in Argument Focused Instruction. In 2012 Annual Meeting for the American Educational Research Association (pp. 1-14). Vancouver: British Columbia.
Enderle, P. J., Grooms, J., & Sampson, V. (2013). The Use of Argumentation in Science Education to Promote the Development of Science Proficiency: A Comparative Case Study. In Paper Presented Conference of the Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (p. 13). Washington DC: SREE. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED564062.pdf
Fisher, K. M., Williams, K. S., & Lineback, J. E. (2011). Osmosis and Diffusion Conceptual Assessment. CBE Life Sciences Education, 10, 418-429. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.11-04-0038
Foong, C. C., & Daniel, E. G. S. (2013). Students’ Argumentation Skills across Two Socio-Scientific Issues in a Confucian Classroom: Is Transfer Possible? International Journal of Science Education, 35, 2331-2355. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.697209
Friedler, Y., Amir, R., & Tamir, P. (1987). High School Students’ Difficulties in Understanding Osmosis. International Journal of Science Education, 9, 541-551. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.697209
Glassman, M. (2001). Dewey and Vygotsky: Society, Experience, and Inquiry in Educational Practice. Educational Researcher, 30, 3-14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x030004003
Gultepe, N., & Kilic, Z. (2015). Effect of Scientific Argumentation on the Development of Scientific Process Skills in the Context of Teaching Chemistry. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 10, 111-132. https://doi.org/10.1037/t51058-000
Hasni, A., Roy, P., & Dumais, N. (2016). The Teaching and Learning of Diffusion and Osmosis: What Can We Learn from Analysis of Classroom Practices? A Case Study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12, 1507-1531.
Hasnunidah, N., Susilo, H., Henie, M. I., & Sutomo, H. (2015). Argument-Driven Inquiry with Scaffolding as the Development Strategies of Argumentation and Critical Thinking Skills of Students in Lampung, Indonesia. American Journal of Educational Research, 3, 1195-1192.
Henderson, J. B., McNeill, K. L., González-Howard, M., Close, K., & Evans, M. (2018). Key Challenges and Future Directions for Educational Research on Scientific Argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55, 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21412
Heng, L. L., & Surif, J. (2013a). Penghujahan Saintifik: Penguasaan Pelajar dalam Konsep Asid dan Bes Secara Individu dan Kumpulan. In International Seminar on Quality and Affordable Education (pp. 40-51). Johor Bahru: UTM.
Heng, L. L., & Surif, J. (2013b). Penghujahan Saintifik: Memahami Perlaksanaannya dalam Proses Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Kimia. Jurnal Teknologi, 65, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v65.1549
Heng, L. L., Surif, J., & Seng, C. H. (2014). Individual versus Group Argumentation: Student’s Performance in a Malaysian Context. International Education Studies, 7, 109-124. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n7p109
Heng, L. L., Surif, J., & Seng, C. H. (2015a). Malaysian Students’ Scientific Argumentation: Do Groups Perform Better than Individuals? International Journal of Science Education, 37, 505-528. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.995147
Heng, L. L., Surif, J., & Seng, C. H. (2015b). Mastery of Scientific Argumentation on the Concept of Neutralization in Chemistry: A Malaysian Perspective. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 12, 85-101. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2015.12.5
Hofstein, A., & Kind, P. M. (2012). Learning in and from Science Laboratories. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second International Handbook of Science Education (pp. 189-208). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_15
Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., Rodríaguez, A. B., & Duschl, R. A. (2000). “Doing the Lesson” or “Doing Science”: Argument in High School Genetics. Science Education, 84, 757-792. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6 3.0.CO;2-F
Kim, H., & Song, J. (2006). The Features of Peer Argumentation in Middle School Students’ Scientific Inquiry. Research in Science Education, 36, 211-233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-9005-2
Lee, S. S., & Daniel, E. G. S. (2012). Development and Administration of a Two-Tier Diagnotic Test to Investigate Students’ Coherent Understanding of the Movement of Substances across the Plasma Membrane. In A. N. Md Zain, & D. R. Peter (Eds.), Transforming School Science Education in the 21st Century (pp. 332-345). Penang: SEAMEO-RECSAM Publications.
Lefrancois, G. R. (2012). Teories of Human Learning 6e: What the Professor Said (6th ed.). Belmont, USA: Wadsworth.
Lisi, R. De. (2002). From Marbles to Instant Messenger: Implications of Piaget’s Ideas about Peer Learning. Theory into Practice, 41, 26-32. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4101_2
Mcneill, K. L. (2009). Teachers’ Use of Curriculum to Support Students in Writing Scientific Arguments to Explain Phenomena. Science Education, 93, 233-268. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20294
McNeill, K. L., & Pimentel, D. S. (2010). Scientific Discourse in Three Urban Classrooms: The Role of the Teacher in Engaging High School Students in Argumentation. Science Education, 94, 203-229. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20364
McNeill, K. L., Katsh-Singer, R., González-Howard, M., & Loper, S. (2016). Factors Impacting Teachers' Argumentation Instruction in Their Science Classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 38, 2026-2046. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1221547
Mcneill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. (2006). Supporting Students’ Construction of Scientific Explanations by Fading Materials Scaffolds in Instructional Materials. The Journal of the Learning Science, 15, 153-191. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1502_1
Millar, R., & Abrahams, I. (2009). Practical Work: Making It More Effective. School Science Review, 91, 59-64.
MOE (2012). Integrated Curriculum for Secondary Schools: Curriculum Specifications Biology form 4. Putrajaya: Curriculum Development Centre Ministry of Education Malaysia.
Newton, P., & Driver, R. (1999). The Place of Argumentation in the Pedagogy of School Science. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 553-576. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290570
Nur, S., Mahmud, D., Nasri, N. M., Samsudin, M. A., & Halim, L. (2018). Science Teacher Education in Malaysia: Challenges and Way Forward. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 4, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-018-0026-3
Nussbaum, E. M., & Sinatra, G. M. (2003). Argument and Conceptual Engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 384-395. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00038-3
Oldfather, P., West, J., White, J., & Wilmarth, J. (1999). Learning through Children’s Eyes: Social Constructivism and the Desire to Learn. Washington DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10328-000
Osborne, J. (2012). The Role of Argument: Learning How to Learn in School Science. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second International Handbook of Science Education (pp. 933-950). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_62
Osborne, J. (2013). The 21st Century Challenge for Science Education: Assessing Scientific Reasoning. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 265-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.07.006
Osborne, J. (2015). Practical Work in Science: Misunderstood and Badly Used? School Science Review, 96, 16-24.
Osborne, J. F. (2010). An Argument for Arguments in Science Classes. Phi Delta Kappan, 91, 62-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171009100413
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the Quality of Argumentation in School Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 994-1020. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20035
Osborne, J., Simon, S., Christodoulou, A., Howell-Richardson, C., & Richardson, K. (2013). Learning to Argue: A Study of Four Schools and Their Attempt to Develop the Use of Argumentation as a Common Instructional Practice and Its Impact on Students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 315-347. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21073
Peen, T. Y., & Arshad, M. Y. (2013). Collaborative and Self-Directed Learning Processes: A Case Study in Malaysian Chemistry PBL Lesson. In International Seminar on Quality and Affordable Education (pp. 76-84). Johor Bahru: UTM.
Peen, T. Y., & Arshad, M. Y. (2014). Teacher and Student Questions: A Case Study in Malaysian Secondary School Problem-Based Learning. Asian Social Science, 10, 174. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n4p174
Piaget, J. (1959). The Language and Thought of the Child (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
Pritchard, A., & Woollard, J. (2010). Psychology for the Classroom: Constructivism and Social Learning. Florence, KY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203819166
Reiss, M. J., Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (1999). Beyond 2000: Science/Biology Education for the Future. Journal of Biological Education, 33, 68-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1999.9655644
Sampson, V., & Blanchard, M. R. (2012). Science Teachers and Scientific Argumentation: Trends in Views and Practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 1122-1148. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21037
Sampson, V., & Clark, D. (2009). The Impact of Collaboration on the Outcomes of Scientific Argumentation. Science Education, 93, 448-484. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20306
Sampson, V., & Gleim, L. (2009). Argument-Driven Inquiry to Promote the Understanding of Important Concepts &Practices in Biology. The American Biology Teacher, 71, 465-472. https://doi.org/10.2307/20565359
Sampson, V., & Walker, J. P. (2012). Argument-Driven Inquiry as a Way to Help Undergraduate Students Write to Learn by Learning to Write in Chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 1443-1485. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.667581
Sampson, V., Enderle, P. J., Grooms, J., & Southerland, S. A. (2012). Using Laboratory Activities that Emphasize Argumentation and Argument to Help High School Students Learn How to Engage in Scientific Inquiry and Understand the Nature of Science. In Annual International Conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (p. 57). Indianapolis, USA: NARST.
Sampson, V., Enderle, P., Gleim, L., Grooms, J., Hester, M., Southerland, S., & Wilson, K. (2014). Argument-Driven Inquiry in Biology. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
Sampson, V., Grooms, J., & Enderle, P. (2011). New Instruments that Can Be Used by Researchers to Assess Three Different Aspects of Science Proficiency. In Fall Conference for the Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness (p. 19). Washington DC, USA: SREE. https://www.sree.org/conferences/2011f/program/downloads/abstracts/321.pdf
Sampson, V., Grooms, J., & Walker, J. P. (2009). Argument-Driven Inquiry: A Way to Promote Learning during Laboratory Activities. The Science Teacher, 76, 42-47.
Sampson, V., Grooms, J., & Walker, J. P. (2011). Argument-Driven Inquiry as a Way to Help Students Learn How to Participate in Scientific Argumentation and Craft Written Arguments: An Exploratory Study. Science Education, 95, 217-257. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20421
Sandoval, W. A., & Millwood, K. A. (2005). The Quality of Students’ Use of Evidence in Written Scientific Explanations. Cognition and Instruction, 23, 23-55. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2301_2
Sandoval, W. A., & Reiser, B. J. (2004). Explanation-Driven Inquiry: Integrating Conceptual and Epistemic Scaffolds for Scientific Inquiry. Science Education, 88, 345-372. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10130
Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to Teach Argumentation: Research and Development in the Science Classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 235-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500336957
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive Load during Problem Solving: Effects on Learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257-285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
Tekkaya, C. (2003). Remediating High School Students’ Misconceptions Concerning Diffusion and Osmosis through Concept Mapping and Conceptual Change Text. Research in Science & Technological Education, 21, 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140308340
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. London: Harvard University Press.
Walker, J. P., Sampson, V., & Zimmerman, C. O. (2011). Argument-Driven Inquiry: An Introduction to a New Instructional Model for Use in Undergraduate Chemistry Labs. Journal of Chemical Education, 88, 1048-1056. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed100622h
Watson, J. R., Swain, J. R. L., & McRobbie, C. (2004). Research Report. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 25-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000072764
Watters, D. J., & Watters, J. J. (2007). Approaches to Learning by Students in the Biological Sciences: Implications for Teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 19-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600621282
Wei, B., Chen, S., & Chen, B. (2018). An Investigation of Sources of Science Teachers’ Practical Knowledge of Teaching with Practical Work. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17, 723-738.
Zeidler, D. L. (1997). The Central Role of Fallacious Thinking in Science Education. Science Education, 81, 483-496. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199707)81:4 3.3.CO;2-R