Evaluation as an educational process is fundamental and important, particularly of the teaching and learning process in the area of mathematics in which this research paper focuses, because although two different process es are closely related to each other and it is not possible to assess one of them without taking into account the other, because when assessing, for example, learning is necessary to evaluate the factors, contexts, emotions and other variables that a ff ect to both, like the culture (interests, attitude, life project, values, and principles, teacher training, …), ICT and the quality.
Andina Corporation for Development (2007). Colombia. Decennial Plan of Education 2006-2015: Policy Notes.
Baartman, L. K. J., Prins, F. J., Kirschner, P. A., & Vleuten, V. D. (2007). Determining the Quality of Competence Assessment Programs: A Self-Evaluation Procedure. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 33, 258-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2007.07.004
Black, P., & William, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education, 5, 7-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
Bravo, A. A., & Fernández, del V. J. (2000). The Conventional Evaluation versus New Models of Authentic Evaluation. Psicothema, 12, 95-99.
Castillo, A. S., & Cabrerizo, D. J. (2003). Educational Evaluation Practices. Madrid: Editorial Pearson.
Castillo, A. S., & Cabrerizo, D. J. (2010). Educational Evaluation of Learning and Competencies. Madrid: Editorial Pearson.
Cid, S. A., Pérez, A. A., & Zabalza, M. A. (2009). Declared Teaching Practices of the “Best Professors” of the University of Vigo. Relieve, 15, 1-29. http://www.uv.es/RELIEVE/v15n2/RELIEVEv15n2_7.htm
Córdoba, F. (2006). The Evaluation of Students: An Open Discussion. Revista Iberoamericana de Education, 39, 1-9.
Crooks, T. (1988). The Impact of Classroom Evaluation Practices on Students. Review of Educational Research, 58, 438-481. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543058004438
Díaz-Barriga, F., & Hernández, G. (2002). Teaching Strategies for Meaningful Learning: A Constructivist Interpretation (2nd ed.). México: McGraw-Hill.
García, J. M. (2000). What Extracurricular Factors or Biases Affect Teacher Assessment in Higher Education? Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 5, 303-325.
González, F., Gómez, E., Rodríguez, M., & Aguilera, J. L. (2009). Prospective and Evaluation of the Teaching Practice of University Professors as an Exponent of Good Quality. Journal of the University and Knowledge Society, 6, 38-48.
ICFES (2007). Proposal for a Conceptual Foundation in the Area of Mathematics.
ICFES (2013). Sistema Nacional de Evaluación Estandarizada de la Educación: Alignment of the 11th SABER Exam. Bogotá.
Jorba, J., & Sanmartí, N. (1994). Systemic Networks. Teaching, Learning and Evaluating. A Continuous Evaluation Processes. Barcelona: Ministry of Education and Culture.
MEN (2003). How to Understand the KNOW Tests and What Follows? Guide Series No. 2.
MEN (2006a). Basic Standards of Proficiency in Language, Mathematics, Science, and Citizens: Guide to What Students Should Know and Know How to Do with What They Learn. Bogotá: Ministry of National Education.
MEN (2006b). Changes in Assessment Policy, Altablero, (38), January-March.
MEN (2010). Education Revolution 2002-2010: Actions and Lessons. Bogotá: Ministry of Education.
MEN (2013). Presentation: Program for the Transformation of Educational Quality (pp. 1-25).
MEN (2016). Assessment, Taken on January 4, 2019 from the MEN. https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1759/w3-article-179264.html
OECD (2003). Learners for Life. Student Approaches to Learning. Results from PISA 2000. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264103917-en
OECD (2007). PISA 2006: Science Competencies for Tomorrow’s World (Volume 1). Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD (2009). The OECD PISA Program: What It Is and What It Is for. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/39730818.pdf https://doi.org/10.1787/2c7c311d-en
OECD (2013). PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do (Volume I).
OECD (2015). PISA 2015, Key Results.
OECD (2016). Low-Performing Students: Why They Fall Behind and How to Help Them Succeed. http://www.oecd.org/edu/low-performing-students- 9789264250246-en.htm
OECD (2018). “Colombia”, in Education at a Glance 2018: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2018-75-en
Ortiz, J. G., & Buitrago, H. (2017). Assessment in the Colombian Educational Tradition. Social Classification Instrument. Revista Interamericana de Investigación, Educación y Pedagogía, 10, 145-172. https://doi.org/10.15332/s1657-107X.2017.0001.11
Pérez, A. I., & Soto, E. (2011). Lights and Shadows of PISA. Educational Meaning of External Assessments. Culture and Education. Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 23, 171-182. https://doi.org/10.1174/113564011795944758
RAE (2018). The Dictionary of the Spanish Language . https://dle.rae.es/?id=H8JsfPe
Santos, G. M. A. (2003). An Arrow on the Target. Assessment as Learning. Madrid: Editorial Narcea.
Tiana, A. (1996). The Dilemmas of Quality and the Role of Assessment. Topics for Debate, 20, 46-51.
Tiana, A. (1999). Assessment and Quality: Two Issues for Discussion. Essay on Public Policy in Education, 7, 25-46.
Tobón, S., Rial, A., Carretero, M., & García, J. (2006). Competencies, Quality and Higher Education. Bogotá: Editorial Magisterio.
UNESCO (2000). Education for All: Status and Trends 2000: Assessing Learning Achievement.
Zaragoza, R. J. M. (2003). Attitudes of the Teachers of Obligatory Secondary School towards the Assessment of the Learning of the Students. Doctoral Thesis, Barcelona: Autonomous University of Barcelona.