Student Error Analysis in Learning Algebraic Expression: A Study in Secondary School Putrajaya
- 1 Centre of Innovation in Teaching and Learning, Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia
- 2 Centre of Innovation in Teaching and Learning, Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia
Abstract
Algebraic expressions are an essential topic in the mathematics curriculum as they are interrelated in the application of problem-solving in science and mathematics. Previous studies showed that most students have a low level of understanding of algebraic expressions. This study was conducted to identify the type of student error in learning Algebra Expression topics among Form 4 students. A total of 67 students from Secondary School Putrajaya, comprising 31 males and 36 females, were involved in the study. The instrument used in this study was the Algebraic Expression Diagnostic Test with a reliability value of α = 0.819. This diagnostic test covers two critical concepts in algebraic expressions, namely the development and functioning of algebraic expressions. The types of errors are classified according to Newman’s Error Hierar chical Model, such as the reading error, comprehension, transformation, process skills, encoding or negligence. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, namely mean, frequency, and percentage. Inferential statistics, namely the Pearson r correlation. The findings show that students often make the wrong kind of process skills. No students made any reading mistakes. The number of students who form the wrong kind of comprehension, transformation, encoding, and negligence is small. Student’s error in the topic of algebraic expressions is due to students’ weaknesses in finding the most significant common factor, cross-sectional processes, and weaknesses in mastering fractions and negative numbers. It is hoped that the information obtained in this study will help students and teachers to solve learning problems related to the topic of algebraic expressions.
- Abdul Wahab, A. M., Ang, M. C., Jenal, R., Mukhtar, M., Elias, N. F., Arshad, H., Ashaari Sahari, N., & Abdul Shukor, S. (2018). MOOC Implementation in Address-ing the Needs of Generation Z towards Discrete Mathematics Learning. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 96, 7030-7040.
- Aida Suraya, M. Y. (1991). Beberapa Masalah Murid Tahun Lima Dalam Menjawab-Soalan Ujian Matematik. Berita Matematik, 38, 17-21.
- Aini Haziah, A., & Zanaton, H. I. (2018). Lesson Study: An Approach to Increase the Competency of out-of-Field Mathematics Teacher in Building the Students Con-ceptual Understanding in Learning Mathematics. Journal of Educational Sciences, 2, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.31258/jes.2.2.p.1-13
- Azrul Fahmi, I., & Marlina, A. (2007). Analisis Kesilapan Dalam Tajuk Ungkapan Al-gebra Di Kalangan Pelajar Tingkatan Empat. Buletin Persatuan Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik Johor, 10, 20-30.
- Bed Raj, A. (2017) Factors Affecting Difficulties in Learning Mathematics by Mathe-matics Learners. International Journal of Elementary Education, 6, 8-15. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeedu.20170602.11
- Booth, L. R. (1981). Child Methods in Secondary Mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 29-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00386044
- Charles, R., & Lester, F. (1987). How to Evaluate Progress in Problem Solving. Reston: NCTM.
- Demby, A. (1997). Algebraic Procedures Used by 13-to-15-Year-Olds. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33, 45-70. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002963922234
- Filloy, E., & Rojano, T. (1989). Solving Equation: The Transition from Arithmetic to Algebra. For the Learning of Mathematics, 9, 19-25.
- Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2003). Sukatan Pelajaran Kemahiran Bersepadu Sekolah Menengah: Matematik.
- Kuchemann, D. E. (1981). Cognitive Demand of Secondary School Mathematic Items. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 301-306. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00311061
- Ling, G. C. L., Shahril, M., & An, A. (2016). Common Misconceptions of Algebraic Problems: Identifying Trends and Proposing Possible Remedial Measures. Ad-vanced Science Letter, 22, 1547-1550. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2016.6675
- Majid, K. (2000). Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
- Mazlan, I. (2002). Amalan Pembelajaran Koperatif Oleh Guru-Guru Dan Kesan Ke Atas Sikap Pelajar Terhadap Matematik. Projek Penyelidikan Sarjana. Selangor, Malaysia: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.