Contribution of District Transformation Program and Change Commitment toward Development of School Leaders Capacity and Quality of Teaching
- 1 Centre of Educational Leadership and Policy, Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia
- 2 Centre of Educational Leadership and Policy, Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia
- 3 Centre of Educational Leadership and Policy, Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia
Abstract
The Ministry of Education Malaysia has launched the Regional Transformation Program to work with the District Education Offices to develop leaders’ professionalism in schools and quality of teaching to improve the nation’s education performance. This research is conducted to identify the level of implementation of the District Transformation Programme, level of change commitment and impact on Leadership Capacity Building in Schools and quality of teaching. A descriptive survey study was used to collect information on the three dimensions of PPD transformation implementation and change commitment while the inference from the survey study was used to identify the impact of PPD’s transformation on the development of school leadership capabilities and the impact of change commitment on the quality of teaching. A total of 400 respondents consisting of education service officers from 13 PPDs in Malaysia were randomly selected. The findings show that the three dimensions of PPD transformation implementation and change Commitment are at a very high level. The findings also show that the implementation of this district transformation program is very relevant to help improve leadership capabilities in schools when the Re-Enculturation contributes 19.6% (β = .291; t = 5.759; p = .000). Furthermore, the Guidance and Mentorship Management accounted for 5.1% (β = .221; t = 4.294; p = .000). Meanwhile, the restructuring dimension contributed by 1.6% (β = .138; t = 2.967; p = .003). Change commitment is very relevant to improve the quality of teaching, affective commitment contributes 15.7% (β = .307; t = 6.228; p = .000), normative commitment contributes 3.4% (β = .198; t = 4.026; p = .000) and continuation commitment contributes .9% (β = - .096; t = 4.026; p = .033). Nevertheless, research on the quality of school leadership is yet to be implemented to ensure that the government’s aim to place high quality leaders in every school in Malaysia is realized.
- Anuar Bin, S. (2013). Pengaruh Perubahan Organisasi Sekolah Dan Komitmen Guru Terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Dan Tekanan Kerja. Ph.D. Thesis, Selangor, Malaysia: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
- Arsaythamby, V., & Mary, M. (2013). The Effects of Clinical Supervision on the Teaching Performance of Secondary School Teachers. Asia Pacific Journal of Edu-cators and Education, 28, 81-102.
- Baharom, M., & Mohamad Johdi, S. (2009). Kepimpinan Pendidikan Dalam Pembangunan Modal Insan. Seminar Pembangunan Insan, 2009, 1-9.
- Fatemeh, R., & Khadijah, D. (2013). Effects of Transformational Leadership on Or-ganizational Commitment at University Departmental Level. In 2nd International Seminar on Quality and Affordable Education (ISQAE 2013). Johor, Malaysia: Uni-versity of Technology, Malaysia.
- Fuziah Binti, M. Y. (2011). Hubungan Antara Amalan Kepimpinan Transformasi Pengetua Dengan Amalan Organisasi Pembelajaran Guru Di Sekolahsekolah Menengah Kluster. Master Thesis, Selangor, Malaysia: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
- Hairani Binti, R. (2006). Kesan Latihan Dalam Perkhidmatan Ke Atas Kualiti Pengajaran Dam Pembelajran Dalam Bidang Teknik Dan Vokasional. Master Thesis, Johor, Malaysia: Universiti Teknologi Hussein Onn.
- Jamelaa Bibi, B. A. (2012). Amalan Kepimpinan Instruksional Dan Sikap Terhadap Perubahan Dalam Kalangan Pengetua Sekolah Menengah Di Negeri Pahang. Ph.D. Thesis, Selangor, Malaysia: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
- Jamil, A. (2002). Pemupukan Budaya Penyelidikan Di Kalangan Guru Sekolah: Satu Penilaian. Ph.D. Thesis, Selangor, Malaysia: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
- Lambert, L. (2010). Keupayaan Kepimpinan Untuk Pembangunan Sekolah Yang Berterusan (Leadership Capacity for Lasting School Improvement). Kuala Lumpur: Institut Terjemahan Negara Malaysia Berhad.
- Ministry of Education, Malaysia (2013a). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025. Putrajaya: BahagianPerancangan Dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan.
- Ministry of Education, Malaysia (2013b). Buku Panduan Pelan Transformasi Daerah. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pengurusan Sekolah Harian.
- Mohammed Sani, I., & Jamalul Lail Abdul, W. (2012). Kepimpinan Pendidikan. Bangi Selangor: Penerbit UKM.
- Mohammed Sani, I., & Mohd Izham Mohd, H. (2012). Pengurusan Perubahan Makro Dalam Pendidikan. Bangi Selangor: Penerbit UKM.