Model, Instruments, and Unity Index and Their Impact on the Unity Policy
- 1 Ministry of Education, Putrajaya, Malaysia
- 2 Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia
- 3 Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia
- 4 Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia
Abstract
The discussion on unity has never come to an end. To date, various actions have been taken to strengthen unity. Yet the direction of strengthening unity is still blurry whereas the measurement of unity in Malaysia remains a challenge. In 2014, the Education Planning and Research Division (EPRD), Ministry of Education Malaysia (MOE) through Unity Level Measurement Survey led to the success of developing instruments to produce an index as well as in developing a Unity Model of Teachers and Student. The index can be interpreted to determine unity level of students and teachers. To date, KPM has succeeded in producing the unity index for 2014, 2016, and 2018. Besides sharing KPM’s achievements, this paper discussed on student unity index for 2014, 2016, and 2018 as well as the impact of the index on the unity initiative under the Malaysia Education Blueprint (PPPM) 2013-2025. The unity index and model are also referred by the other Division s at MOE to streamline the Student Integration Plan for Unity, deve loping Guideline Book to Strengthen Unity through Islamic Education Subjects and Moral Education, developing Guidelines for Unity Practices in Schools, Conducting Yearly Unity Practice Inspections at Schools, and developing Unity Roadmap in Education. Various parties also refer to these models and instruments in conducting their studies on unity.
- Education Policy Planning and Research Division (2006). Malaysian EducationalStatistics 2006. Federal Territory of Putrajaya. Ministry of Education Malaysia.
- Educational Policy Planning and Research Division (2012). National Education Policy 2012. Federal Territory of Putrajaya. Ministry of Education Malaysia.
- Fariza, M. S. (2018). Z Generation and Unity Issue (pp. 14-19). ICIP 2018 (International Colloquium on Integration Platform.
- Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308
- Marlina Binti, N. N., & Norasmah, O. (2018). Administration and Infrastructure Facilities Management for Unity in Secondary School. Proceeding: 2nd International Conference on Education, Business, Islamic and Technology (ICEBIT 2018) Seaview Langkawi Hotel, 1-2 September 2018.
- Ministry of Education Malaysia (2012). Report Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025. Federal Territory of Putrajaya. Ministry of Education Malaysia.
- Mohanambal, M., & Anuar, A. (2017). 21st Century Learning History for National Unity (pp. 3067-3079). International Conference on Global Education.
- Nordin, M., Abdul, R. R., Abdul, T. M. H., Abdul Razaq, A., & Mohd, M. A. (2018). A Case Study of PERPADUAN Pre-School Settings Inculcates Multi-Ethnic Awareness among Preschoolers’. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8, 1181-1190. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i10/5289
- Pallant, J. (2001). A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS for Windows (Version 12). Buckingham: Open University Press.
- Sabitha, M. (2005). Social Science Research Methods. Petaling Jaya: Pearson Prectice Hall (Malaysia).
- Sekaran, U. (2003). Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
- Shah, R. Z., & Maimun, A. L. (2016). The Value of Unity in an Islamic State According to the Medina Charter Perspective (pp. 115-126). The 9th International Workshop and Conference of Asian Studies in Islamic and Arabic Education and Educational Technology (POLMED-UKM-UMSU) 2016.
- Teo, K. S. (2017). Bahasa Melayu as a Tool of Unity (pp. 92-103). Prosiding: Konvensyen Memperkukuh Pasak Negara: Ke Arah Wasiat Lebih Tersurat.