A Proposal for a Nominative Fair Use Provision in Chinese Trademark Law
- 1 Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan, China
- 2 Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition, Munich, Germany
Abstract
The new Chinese Trademark Law in 2019 set forth several statutory limitation of trademark right, including descriptive fair use. However, it does not provide any defense for the nominative fair use. Absence of the nominative fair use defense against trademark infringement, China courts apply improper standard to determine such nominative use, and it results in frustrating purpose of trademark law and expanding trademark holder right. After many cases had been determined subject to the doctrine of nominative fair use, the United States well established the doctrine of nominative fair use, also there are statue basis of nominative fair use in the United States federal dilution statute. As this article will demonstrate, Chinese Trademark Law should adopt a nominative fair use defense. The main reason for allowing such use is that such use can reduce customer search costs and promote free flow of information in the market which is a goal of trademark law. So far there is not any satisfactory solution. The article proposes adoption of US common law nominative fair use doctrine with China civil law styled.
- Arthur, L. W. (2010). Ebay Becomes a Girl’s New Best Friend as the Second Circuit Sidesteps the Nominative Fair Use Doctrine, Leaving Tiffany to Police Counterfeits in the Online Marketplace. North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology, 12, 29-33.
- Cheng, A. Y. (2006). KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. V. Lasting Impression I, Inc.: Reconciling Fair Use and the Likelihood of Confusion. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 21, 425-430.
- China Intellectual Property (2011). Defense of Trademark Infringement Exceptions—A Study from the Perspective of Cases. http://ipr.chinadaily.com.cn/2011-02/25/content_12080431_2.htm
- China Intellectual Property/Kevin Nie (2013). Model IP Cases of China from 2012. http://www.chinaipmagazine.com/en/journal-show.asp?id=973
- Diao, Q. S. (2012). Research on the Nominative Use of Trademarks. Master Thesis, Chongqing: Southwest University of Political Science and Law.
- Du, Y. (2012). Social Progress and Trademark Viewpoint: The Past, Present and Future of Trademark Law. Beijing: Peking University Press.
- Dunning, J. P. (2006). Whatever Happened to New Kids on the Block? The Nominative Fair Use Defense to Trademark Infringement. Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal, 18, 1-10.
- Feng, X. Q. (2006). Research on the Limitation of Trademark Right. Sea of Learning, 4, 137-146.
- Huang, H. (2016). Trademark Law. Beijing: Law Press.
- Johnson, S. A. (2006). Century 21 Real Estate Corp. V. Lending Tree, Inc.: Making a Big Deal Out of Nominative Use. Tulane Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property, 8, 207-211.
- Li, Y. F. (2016). Research on the Judgment Standard of Trademark Infringement. Beijing: Intellectual Property Press.
- Li, Y. F., & Diao, Q. S. (2012). Research on the Nominative Use of Trademarks. Application of Law, 4, 24-26.
- Mayberry, J. D. (2012). Trademark Nominative Fair Use: Toward a Uniform Standard. Trademark Report, 102, 820.
- Mcgeveran, W., & Mckenna, M. P. (2013). Confusion Isn’t Everything. Notre Dame Law Review, 89, 253-255.
- Merryman, J. H., & Rogelio, P.-P. (2007). The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Europe and Latin America (4th ed.). Stanford, LA: Stanford University Press.
- Qin, G. W. (2011). The Judgment Standard of Indicative Fair Use of Trademark. Journal of Zhengzhou Light Industry, 1, 97-100.