A plea bargaining system was introduced into Chinese Criminal Procedure Law in 2018 and became a basic principle of Chinese Criminal Procedure. This plea bargaining system embodies characteristics of both adversary and inquisitorial models. Chinese prosecutors are granted with a leading role in this plea bargaining system, as in the U.S., and can decide which cases are suitable for plea bargaining, which type of process can be applied, and give recommendations as to the sentencing, which judges shall in principle follow. To transplant such an arrangement from the U.S. model into an inquisitorial system, however, causes various problems. Fairness and justice cannot be entirely guaranteed under the wide-ranging practice of plea bargaining; the function of trials is derogated and undermined; and the decision-making process on core issues is moved forwards to the pre-trial period. Moreover, the procedural rights of defendants are more at risk when prosecutors dominate plea bargaining without any supervision from outside. With a brief introduction of an inquisitorial model based on the German plea bargaining system, the role of Chinese prosecutors in plea bargaining is urged to be reconsidered and their authority should be restricted in order to ensure that judges are guaranteed the judicial power to make final decisions.
KeywordsPlea BargainingProsecutorsJudgesChinese Criminal Procedure LawGerman Model
American Bar Association (2017). Defense Function (4th ed.). Chicago, IL: American Bar Association. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/criminal_justice/standards/DefenseFunctionFourthEdition/
Bian, J. L., & Li, Y. L. (2021). Several Issues in the Application of Plea Bargaining. Research on Rule of Law, 2, 18-36.
BVerfG (Bundesverfassungsgericht) (1987). Verständigung über Ergebnis eines Strafverfahrens. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (NJW), 2662.
BVerfGE (2013). Verfassungsmäßigkeit der gesetzlichen Regelung zur Verständigung im Strafprozess. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift (NJW), 1058.
Cai, Y. P. (2020). Mediation of Litigant-Centered Principle and Trial-Centered Principle: Professional Ethics of Defense Lawyers. Law and Social Development, 4, 193-209.
Chen, W. D. (2016). Research on Plea Bargaining System. Chinese Law, 2, 48-64.
Cheng, T., & Yu, Ch. (2020). Discussion on Duty Lawyer Participation in the Negotiation of Sentencing Proposal. Law Science Magazine, 11, 111-120.
Chinese Supreme Court (02/17/2017). The Implementation Opinions on Comprehensively Promoting the Reform of the Trial-Centered Criminal Procedure System, No. (2017) 5. Beijing: Chinese Supreme Court.
He, J. H. (2020). Reallocation of Discretion Power of Prosecutors—In the Context of Plea Bargaining. Journal of Soochow University (Philosophy & Social Science Edition), 6, 85-95.
Hu, M., & Song, Sh. M. (2017). The Function of Prosecutors in Plea Bargaining System. People’s Prosecuting, 14, 33-37.
Hu, Y. T. (2018). Interpretation and Application of Chinese Plea Bargaining. Beijing: People’s Court Press.
Karsten, A., Frank, D., & Markus, M. (2013). Die Praxis der Absprachen in Strafverfahren. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Knoops, G. (2005). The Dichotomy between Judicial Economy and Equality of Arms within International and Internationalized Criminal Trials: A Defense Perspective. Fordham International Law Journal, 6, 1566-1594.
LaFave, W. R., Israel, J. H., King, N. J., & Kerr, O. S. (2019). Criminal Procedure. Toronto: Thomson Reuters.
Li, J. M., & Xu, K. J. (2021). The Conflicts and Coordination between “the Trial as the Center” and Plea Bargaining. Jiangsu Social Sciences, 1, 119-128.
Li, Q. (2020). Judicial Determination on “Obvious Inappropriate” of Sentencing Recommendation in Plea Bargaining Cases. Chinese Criminology Review, 6, 95-104.
Li, Z. J. (2021). Dilemma and Outlet: Accurateness of Sentencing Recommendation in Plea Bargaining Cases. ECUPL Journal, 1, 139-152.
Liu, B. N. (2020). Judicial Promise in Plea Bargaining System. Law Science, 12, 50-64.
Lu, Y. Y., & Zeng, Y. (2018). Competence of Judges in Plea Bargaining System—Observation on Pilot Program on Plea Bargaining in City C. Social Sciences in Guangdong, 6, 222-230.
Meng, J. Z. (2014). To Improve the Administration of Justice and its Function. Beijing: Post of People’ Court.
Murmann, U. (2009). Reform ohne Wiederkehr?—Die gesetzliche Regelung der Absprachen im Strafverfahren. Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik, 10, 526-538.
Nahrwold, F. (2014). Die Verständigung im Strafverfahren. Baden-Baden: Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845256788
Niemöller, M., Schlothauer, R., & Weider, H. (2010). §257c. In M. Niemöller, R. Schlothauer, & H. J. Weider (Eds), Gesetz zur Verständigung im Strafverfahren. Munich: C.H. Beck.
Shi, P. P. (2020a). Investigation Principle for Judges—Inquisitorialism of Criminal Procedure. Law Review, 2, 79-89.
Shi, Zh. K. (2020b). Several Indexes on Procedural Supervision increase to Provide Legal Protection. Beijing: Daily of Prosecution.
Silver, J. S. (1990). Equality of Arms and the Adversarial Process: A New Constitutional Right. Wisconsin Law Review, 4, 1007-1042.
Stuckenberg, C. (2012). §257c. In H. Hilger, V. Erb, & R. Esser (Eds), Löwe-Rosenberg: Die Strafprozessordnung und das Gerichtsverfassungsgesetz: StPO (26 ed.). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Sun, Ch. Y. (2021). Five Conflicts and their Resolution in Plea Bargaining System. Political Science and Law, 1, 2-20.
Wang, H. Y. (2018a). Proof Standards in Plea Bargaining Cases. Journal of Comparative Law, 5, 71-81.
Wang, L. Sh. (2018b). Symbolized Legislating of Criminal Procedure and Its Consequences—Literal Interpretation Based on 30.3 Million Decisions. Tsinghua University Law Journal, 6, 124-147.
Wei, X. N. (2019). Plea Bargaining System from the Perspective of Structure. The Jurist, 2, 111-123.
Wei, X. N. (2020). Conflict and Integration: Localization of Plea Bargaining System. Peking University Law Journal, 5, 1211-1230.
Xiao, Y., & Gong, H. Ch. (2021). Standardization on Sentencing Recommendation in Plea Bargaining System. Legality Vision, 4, 130-131.
Yan, Z. H. (2020). Conflicts and Resolutions between Prosecutors and Judges by the Application of “Shall in Principle Accept” Provision—Analysis on Art. 201 of Chinese Criminal Procedure Law. Global Law Review, 5, 133-148.
You, M., & Li, R. (2018). Brief Discussion on Important Issues on the Application of Plea Bargaining during Investigation. Chinese Criminology Review, 1, 60-66.
Zhou, Q. (2017). Middle-Term Report of Supreme Court and Supreme People’s Prosecutorate on Experiment of Plea Bargaining in Some Regions. Beijing: Post of People’ Court.
Zhou, X. (2021). Accurateness of Sentencing in Plea Bargaining Cases. Political Science and Law, 1, 21-34.
Zhu, X. Q. (2018). The Application of Plea Bargaining during Investigation. Criminal Science, 1, 111-125.
Zhu, X. Q. (2021). Several Debatable Issues on Plea Bargaining System. Research on Rule of Law, 2, 3-17.