The core value and moral codes in Laoist politics are the essential factors that mold the political ethics in the Eastern Asia. In this study, the notion of “ziran” (self-thus-ness) was explored from four perspectives: its literal meaning, its five uses, the position of ziran in Laozi’s political thoughts, and the perspective of the target readers of the Dao De Jing (DDJ). We argue that ziran is a highly regarded value in Laoist politics. More precisely, the maintenance of the common people in their self-thus-ness should be the ultimate goal of rulers. Based on this, we asked how this core value can be realized in the process of governing a state. To respond to this question, we applied content analysis and expound the four moral codes that the rulers ought to embrace.
KeywordsCore ValueMoral CodesDao De JingZiranLaoist Politics
Ames, R. T. (1989). Putting the Te Back into Taoism. In C. J. Baird, & A. R. T. Albany (Eds.), Nature in Asian Traditions of Thought: Essays in Environmental Philosophy (pp. 113-44). New York: State University of New York Press.
Ames, R. T. (1994). The Art of Rulership: A Study of Ancient Chinese Political Thought. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Barbalet, J. (2011). Market Relations as Wuwei: Daoist Concept in Analysis of China’s Post-1978 Market Economy. Asian Studies Review, 35, 335-354. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2011.602045
Chan, W. (1963). The Way of Lao Tzu. New York: The Bobbs-Merrill.
Chen, G. Y. (1984). Commentary on and Critical Introduction to the Laozi. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.
Chen, G.-M., & Holt, G. R. (2002). Persuasion through the Water Metaphor in Daodejing. International Communication Studies, 11, 153-171.
Cheung, L. K. C. (2017). The Metaphysics and Unnamability of the Dao in the Daodejing and Wittgenstein. Philosophy East & West, 67, 352-379. https://doi.org/10.1353/pew.2017.0030
Cline, E. M. (2004). Two Interpretations of De in the Daodejing. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 31, 219-233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6253.2004.00151.x
Cooper, D. E. (1994). Is Daoism “Green”? Asian Philosophy, 4, 119-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/09552369408575397
Dong, J. Q. (2014). On Laozi’s Central Value. Social Science Front, 2, 26-31.
Duan, Y. (1982). Shuowen Lexicon. Shanghai: Shanghai Classics Publishing House.
Duncan, C. M., & Steinberger, P. J. (1990). Plato’s Paradox? Guardians and Philosopher-Kings. The American Political Science Review, 84, 1317-1322. https://doi.org/10.2307/1963266
Fan, Y. (2000). A Classification of Chinese Culture. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 7, 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527600010797057
Fried, D. (2012). What’s in a Dao? Ontology and Semiotics in Laozi and Zhuangzi. Dao, 11, 419-436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-012-9290-1
Heilbrunn, D. (2009) Hermann Hesse and the Daodejing on the Wu and You of Sage-Leaders. Dao, 8, 79-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-008-9100-y
Ivanhoe, P. J. (1999). The Concept of de(“Virtue”) in the Laozi. In C. Mark, & P. J. Ivanhoe (Eds.), Religious and Philosophical Aspects of the Laozi (pp. 239-257). Albany, NJ: State University of New York Press.
Jin, J. F. (1998). A New Edition and Detailed Interpretation on Xici of Zhouyi. Shenyang: Liaohai Publishing House.
Krueger, J. W. (2009). Knowing through the Body: The Daodejing and Dewey. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 36, 31-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6253.2008.01503.x
LaFargue, M. (1994). Tao and Method: A Reasoned Approach to the Tao-te-Ching. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Lai, K. (2007). Ziran and Wuwei in the Daodejing: An Ethical Assessment. Dao, 6, 325-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-007-9019-8
Lau, D. C. (1963). Tao Te Ching. London: Penguin Books.
Liu, X. G. (1999). An Inquiry into the Core Value of Laozi’s Philosophy. In C. Mark, & P. J. Ivanhoe (Eds.), Religious and Philosophical Aspects of the Laozi (pp. 211-237). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Lu, X. (2002). Chinese Political Communication: Roots in Tradition and Impacts on Contemporary Chinese Thought and Culture. International Communication Studies, 11, 97-116.
Moeller, H.-G. (2006). The Philosophy of the Daodejing. New York: Columbia University Press.
Nuyen, A. T. (1995). Naming the Unnameable: The Being of the Tao. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 22, 487-497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6253.1995.tb00718.x
Nuyen, A. T. (2000). The Dao of Ethnics: From the Writings of Levinas to the Daodejing. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 27, 287-298. https://doi.org/10.1111/0301-8121.00018
Pappas, N. (2003). Plato and the Republic (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Plato (2003). The Republic. Ontario: Share Books Publishing.
Ruan, Y. (1982). Exegetics of the Ancient Classics. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.
Schwartz, B. I. (1985). The World of Thought in Ancient China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Steinberger, P. J. (1989). Ruling: Guardians and Philosopher-Kings. The American Political Science Review, 83, 1207-1225. https://doi.org/10.2307/1961665
Wagner, R. G. (2003). A Chinese Reading of the Daodejing: Wang Bi’s Commentary on the Laozi with Critical Text and Translation. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Xiao, X. C. (2002). The Rhetorical Construction of the Discourse on the Dao in Daodejing. Intercultural Communication Studies, 11, 137-152.
Xu, Y. (2013). Laws Divine and Human. Beijing: Dolphin Books.
Yan, H. K. T. (2009). A Paradox of Virtue: The Daodejing on Virtue and Moral Philosophy. Philosophy East & West, 59, 173-187. https://doi.org/10.1353/pew.0.0054
Zhou, H. C. (2006). The Concept of De in the Daodejing and the Ethics of Chinese Metaphysics. Studies in Ethics, 25, 86-91.