Protection Model of Security Systems Based on Neyman-Person Criterion
- 1 National Engineering Research Center for Multimedia Software, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
- 2 National Engineering Research Center for Multimedia Software, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
- 3 National Engineering Research Center for Multimedia Software, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
- 4 National Engineering Research Center for Multimedia Software, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
Abstract
In this paper security systems deployed over an area are regarded abstractly as a diagram of security network. We propose the Neyman-Pearson protection model for security systems, which can be used to determine the protection probability of a security system and find the weakest breach path of a security network. We present the weakest breach path problem formulation, which is defined by the breach protection probability of an unauthorized target passing through a guard field, and provide a solution for this problem by using the Dijkstra’s shortest path algorithm. Finally we study the variation of the breach protection probability with the change of the parameters of the model.
- H. A. Bennett and M. T. Olascoaga, “Evaluation Methodology for Fixed-Site Physical Protection Systems,” Nuclear Materials Management, Vol. 9, 1980, pp. 403-410.
- J. L. Darby, B. E. Simpkins and B. R. Key, “A Microcomputer Code for Evaluating Physical Security Effectiveness Using Adversary Sequence Diagrams,” Nuclear Materials Management, Vol. 15, 1986, pp. 242-245.
- L. R. Doyon, “Stochastic Modeling of Facility Security-Systems for Analytical Solutions,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1981, pp. 127-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0360-8352(81)90020-6
- J. E. Kobza and S. H. Jacobson, “Probability Models for Access Security System Architectures,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 48, 1997, pp. 255-263.
- M. J. Hicks, M. S. Snell, J. S. Sandoval and C. S. Potter, “Physical Protection Systems Cost and Performance Analysis: A Case Study,” IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, Vol. 14, No. 4, 1999, pp. 9-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/62.756078
- E. H. Robert Fischer and D. Walters, “Introduction to Security,” 9th Edition, Elsevier, 2012, p. 544.
- Z. Chen, “The Research and Practice on the Evalation of Effectiveness on Security System. China Security, 2007.
- M. L. Garcia, “The Design and Evaluation of Physical Protection Systems,” Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, 2001.
- J. Pollet and J. Cummins, “All Hazards Approach for Assessing Readiness of Critical Infrastructure,” IEEE Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security, Boston, 11- 12 May 2009, pp. 366-372.
- P. Xu, X. Su, J. Wu, X. Sun, Y. Zhang, Y. Deng, “Risk Analysis of Physical Protection System Based on Evidence Theory,” Journal of Information and Computational Science, Vol. 7, 2010, pp. 2871-2878.
- M. E. Nikoofal and J. Zhuang, “Robust Allocation of a Defensive Budget Considering an Attacker’s Private Information,” Risk Analysis, Vol. 32, 2012, pp. 930-943. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01702.x
- K. Hausken and J. Zhuang, “The Timing and Deterrence of Terrorist Attacks Due to Exogenous Dynamics,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 63, 2012, pp. 726-735. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/jors.2011.79
- M. Golalikhani and J. Zhuang, “Modeling Arbitrary Layers of Continuous-Level Defenses in Facing with Strategic Attackers,” Risk Analysis, Vol. 31, 2011, pp. 533- 547. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01531.x