Rising urban population, aging infrastructure, and increasing capital maintenance costs call for more efficient use of limited available resources. To address these concerns, the use of technology for urban infrastructure management and operational efficiency comes naturally with emerging technological advancements. Although there have been analyses on how to conceptually design a smart city from the ground up, they are often less applicable in transforming existing cities into smart ones. Retrofitting existing infrastruc tures requires integration and synergies with existing systems. Given the broad scope of smart cities, this paper equips planners with surface-level considerations in adopting smart mobility solutions. This provides an avenue to assess project feasibility, risk management , and investment requirement. The process is presented via a replicable framework with a use case with simplis tic approaches that do not require complex constraints or modeling. The framework streamlines how to deduce a feasible set of user-centric smart solutions, which are then ranked according to their impacts for implementation priority. Middle East Technical University campus located in Ankara (Tur key) is considered for the use case. The main outcomes for the use case are deducing high-impact smart solutions based on the proposed framework. Preliminary system design analyses are showcased for three high-ranked solutions: electric vehicle charging station installation and investment optimization, autonomous electric shuttle system design, and bus network electrification strategies.
Alayli, B. (2006). Land Use Optimization for Improved Transportation System Performance Case Study: Ankara. Master Thesis, Middle East Technical University.
Altintasi, O. (2013). Assessment of Scenarios for Sustainable Transportation at METU.
Altintasi, O., & Tuydes-Yaman, H. (2016). Best Option for Reducing On-Campus Private Car-Based CO 2 Emissions: Reducing VKT or Congestion? Metu Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 33, 87-105. https://doi.org/10.4305/METU.JFA.2016.1.4
Altıntaşı, O., & Tüydeş Yaman, H. (2016). Utilization of RFID Data to Evaluate Characteristics of Private Car Commuters in Middle East Technical University Campus. Pamukkale University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 22, 171-177. https://doi.org/10.5505/pajes.2015.68725
Angelidou, M. (2014). Smart City Policies: A Spatial Approach. Cities, 41, S3-S11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2014.06.007
Bıyık, C., Abareshi, A., Paz, A., Ruiz, R. A., Battarra, R., Rogers, C. D. F., & Lizarraga, C. (2021). Smart Mobility Adoption: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7, Article No. 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7020146
Fakhrmoosavi, F., Kavianipour, M., Shojaei, M. (Sam), Zockaie, A., Ghamami, M., Wang, J., & Jackson, R. (2021). Electric Vehicle Charger Placement Optimization in Michigan Considering Monthly Traffic Demand and Battery Performance Variations. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2675, 13-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120981958
Fitzgerald, G., Nelder, C., Director, E., Baker Editor, C., & Labrador, D. (2017). From Gas to Grid: Building Charging Infrastructure to Power Electric Vehicle Demand. In J. W. Dash (Ed.), World Scientific Encyclopedia of Climate Change (pp. 327-334). World Scientific.
Fricker, J. D. (2011). Bus Dwell Time Analysis Using On-Board Video. Transportation Research Board 90th Annual Meeting. https://trid.trb.org/view/1091291
Ghamami, M., Kavianipour, M., Zockaie, A., Hohnstadt, L. R., & Ouyang, Y. (2020). Refueling Infrastructure Planning in Intercity Networks Considering Route Choice and Travel Time Delay for Mixed Fleet of Electric and Conventional Vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 120, Article ID: 102802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102802
Grand View Research (2020). Smart Cities Market Analysis from 2016 to 2027.
Gulluoglu, N. C. (2005). Evaluating Public Transportation Alternatives in the METU Campus with the Aid of GIS.
Guo, J. (2016). Advanced Clean Transit Program Literature Review on Transit Bus Maintenance Cost.
Hari, A., Herscovitz, J., Zonnenshain, A., & Weiss, M. P. (2002). Application of ICDM for the Conceptual Design of a New Product. In D. Marjanovic (Ed.), International Design Conference—Design 2002 (pp. 647-654). The Design Society. https://www.designsociety.org/publication/29631/Application+of+ICDM+for+the+Conceptual+Design+of+a+New+Product
International Organization for Standardization (2015). ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288:2015(en), Systems and Software Engineering—System Life Cycle Processes. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso-iec-ieee:15288:ed-1:v1:en
Karatas, P. (2015). Determination of Pedestrian Level of Service for Walkways: METU Campus Example.
Karatas, P., & Tuydes-Yaman, H. (2018). Variability in Sidewalk Pedestrian Level of Service Measures and Rating. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 144, Article ID: 04018042. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000483
Kavianipour, M., Fakhrmoosavi, F., Singh, H., Ghamami, M., Zockaie, A., Ouyang, Y., & Jackson, R. (2021). Electric Vehicle Fast Charging Infrastructure Planning in Urban Networks Considering Daily Travel and Charging Behavior. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 93, Article ID: 102769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102769
Lalmi, A., Fernandes, G., & Souad, S. B. (2021). A Conceptual Hybrid Project Management Model for Construction Projects. Procedia Computer Science, 181, 921-930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.248
Lee, J. H., Hancock, M. G., & Hu, M. C. (2014). Towards an Effective Framework for Building Smart Cities: Lessons from Seoul and San Francisco. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 89, 80-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.033
Middle East Technical University (2017). METU Strategic Plan 2018-2022.
Porru, S., Misso, F. E., Pani, F. E., & Repetto, C. (2020). Smart Mobility and Public Transport: Opportunities and Challenges in Rural and Urban Areas. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 7, 88-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2019.10.002
Secinaro, S., Brescia, V., Calandra, D., & Biancone, P. (2021). Towards a Hybrid Model for the Management of Smart City Initiatives. Cities, 116, Article ID: 103278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103278
Silva, B. N., Khan, M., & Han, K. (2018). Towards Sustainable Smart Cities: A Review of Trends, Architectures, Components, and Open Challenges in Smart Cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 38, 697-713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.053
Singh, A., & Mutreja, S. (2020). Smart Mobility Market by Element: Global Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast, 2020-2027. Allied Market Research. https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/smart-mobility-market-A06658
Soltanpour, A., Ghamami, M., Moore, S., & Anctil, A. (2020). Integrating Revealed and Stated Preference Methods to Capture the User Inclination toward Adoption of Electric Vehicles. In Transportation Research Board 100th Annual Meeting. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/348923793_Integrating_Revealed_and_Stated_Preference_Methods_to_Capture_the_User_Inclination_Toward_Adoption_of_Electric_Vehicles
Yigitcanlar, T., & Lee, S. H. (2014). Korean Ubiquitous-Eco-City: A Smart-Sustainable Urban form or a Branding Hoax? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 89, 100-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.034
Yigitcanlar, T., Kamruzzaman, M., Buys, L., Ioppolo, G., Sabatini-Marques, J., Da Costa, E. M., & Yun, J. H. J. (2018). Understanding “Smart Cities”: Intertwining Development Drivers with Desired Outcomes in a Multidimensional Framework. Cities, 81, 145-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.04.003
Yigitcanlar, T., Kamruzzaman, M., Foth, M., Sabatini-Marques, J., da Costa, E., & Ioppolo, G. (2019). Can Cities Become Smart without Being Sustainable? A Systematic Review of the Literature. Sustainable Cities and Society, 45, 348-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.11.033