Measuring and Improving Environmental Justice in the Urban Outdoors
- 1 Veritas Economics, Cary, North Carolina, USA
- 2 Veritas Economics, Cary, North Carolina, USA
- 3 Institute on Race, Power, and Political Economy, The New School, Manhattan, USA
Abstract
This manuscript presents a comprehensive and flexible approach for quantitatively evaluating environmental justice in the provision of spatially distributed public goods. The approach is used to assess baseline spatial aspects of environmental justice in Hudson County, New Jersey and how it changes with the creation of a new park. The analysis quantitatively evaluates changes in environmental justice fusing a statistically estimated recreation preference function to a neighborhood-level, spatially-distributed population and set of parks. The reliance on a preference function estimated from behavioral data, application of preferences to quantify satisfaction, and explicit quantitative connection between the local population and recreation opportunities represent a significant improvement over the ad hoc and rule-of-thumb approaches that are currently common practice for evaluating environmental justice. Given the recognized importance of measuring outcome improvements, it is expected that the widespread application of this approach will ultimately lead to a general improvement in environmental justice.
- Agimass, F., Lundhede, T., Panduro, T. E., & Jacobsen, J. B. (2017). The Choice of Forest Site for Recreation: A Revealed Preference Analysis Using Spatial Data. Ecosystem Services, 31, 445-454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.11.016
- Banzhaf, S. (2012). The Political Economy of Environmental Justice. Stanford University Press.
- Bingham, M. F., Li, Z., Mathews, K. E., Spagnardi, C. M., Whaley, J. S., Veale, S. G. et al. (2011). An Application of Behavioral Modeling to Characterize Urban Angling Decisions and Values. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 31, 257-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/02755947.2011.571483
- Bullard, R. D. (1993). Confronting Environmental Racism: Voices from the Grassroots. South End Press.
- Commission for Racial Justice, United Church of Christ (1987). Toxic Wastes and Race in the United States: A National Report on the Racial and Socio-Economic Characteristics of Communities with Hazardous Waste Sites.
- Dai, D. (2011) Racial/ethnic and Socioeconomic Disparities in Urban Green Space Accessibility: Where to Intervene? Landscape and Urban Planning, 102, 234-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.05.002
- Estabrooks, P. A., Lee, R. E., & Gyurcsik, N. C. (2003). Resources for Physical Activity Participation: Does Availability and Accessibility Differ by Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status? Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 25, 100-104. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm2502_05
- Federal Register (2022). Notice of Proposed Interim Settlement and Crediting Agreement Under Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/06/07/2022-12154/notice-of-proposed-interim-settlement-and-crediting-agreement-under-comprehensive-environmental
- Goldsmith, B. J. (2023). New Ways to Look at PFAS and Climate Issues: Innovative Best Practice Frameworks for Lawyers and Other Practitioners. American Bar Association.
- Harris, C. D., Paul, P., Zhang, X., & Fulton, J. E. (2015). Park Access among School-Age Youth in the United States. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 12, S94-S101. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2015-0119
- Johnston, R. J., Rolfe, J., Rosenberger, R. S., & Brouwer, R. (2015). Benefit Transfer of Environmental and Resource Values: A Guide for Researchers and Practitioners. Springer
- Kinnell, J. C., Bingham, M. F., Mohamed, A. F., Desvousges, W. H., Kiler, T. B., Hastings, E. K. et al. (2006). Estimating Site Choice Decisions for Urban Recreators. Land Economics, 82, 257-272. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.82.2.257