A Factor Analytic Approach for Sustainable Urban Forest Conservation in Nairobi City
- 1 Centre for Urban Studies, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya
- 2 Centre for Urban Studies, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya
- 3 Centre for Urban Studies, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya
- 4 Department of Landscape Architecture, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya
- 5 Department of Landscape Architecture, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya
Abstract
Urban forests face numerous threats and competing needs in the ever-expanding urban landscapes despite their benefits to urban environments. They therefore need protection through sustainable conservation which is guided by the attitudes of urban residents. This is because attitudes and values attached to something predict its protection. This study therefore sought to investigate attitudes urban residents in Nairobi have towards urban forests through a factor analysis of attitudes on a 7-point Likert psychometric scale collected using a ranking questionnaire developed through literature review on urban forests and analysis of user attitudes. Six underlying factors were extracted with a factor loading of greater than 0.5, constituting the concepts used to provide a framework for the conservation of urban forests. The findings demonstrated favourable attitudes towards urban forests in Nairobi, with most residents believing that urban forests are beneficial and need protection. Consequently, this study recommends protecting the existing urban forest ecosystems while expanding and increasing its quality, biodiversity, and habitat richness through the proposed sustainable urban forest conservation framework.
- Barron, S., Sheppard, S., & Condon, P. (2016). Urban Forest Indicators for Planning and Designing Future Forests. Forests, 7, Article 208. https://doi.org/10.3390/f7090208
- Baumeister, C. F., Gerstenberg, T., Plieninger, T., & Schraml, U. (2022). Geography of Disservices in Urban Forests: Public Participation Mapping for Closing the Loop. Ecosystems and People, 18, 44-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2021.2021289
- De Lourdes Saavedra-Romero, L., Martínez-Trinidad, T., Alvarado-Rosales, D., Hernández-de la Rosa, P., & Villa-Castillo, J. (2021). Damaging Agents and Tree’s Health Condition in an Urban Forest. Open Journal of Forestry, 11, 238-253. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojf.2021.113016
- Devisscher, T., Ordóñez-Barona, C., Dobbs, C., Dias Baptista, M., Navarro, N. M., Orozco Aguilar, L. A. et al. (2022). Urban Forest Management and Governance in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Baseline Study of Stakeholder Views. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 67, Article ID: 127441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127441
- Dharma, W., & Zakaria, R. (2022). Vegetation Analysis of 10 Urban Forests in the City of Banda Aceh, Indonesia. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity, 23, 4131-4137. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d230834
- Dobbs, C., Escobedo, F. J., & Zipperer, W. C. (2011). A Framework for Developing Urban Forest Ecosystem Services and Goods Indicators. Landscape and Urban Planning, 99, 196-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.11.004
- Göktuğ, T. H., Yıldız, N. D., Demir, M., & Mestav, B. (2015). Examining the Level of Service in the Context of Recreational Carrying Capacity in the Erzurum Urban Forest, Turkey. Journal of Environmental Protection, 6, 1014-1028. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2015.69090
- Herzog, T. R., Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (1982). The Prediction of Preference for Unfamiliar Urban Places. Population and Environment, 5, 43-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01359051
- Jang-Hwan, J., So-Hee, P., JaChoon, K., Taewoo, R., Lim, E. M., & Yeo-Chang, Y. (2020). Preferences for Ecosystem Services Provided by Urban Forests in South Korea. Forest Science and Technology, 16, 86-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2020.1762761
- Kaplan, H. B. (1982). Self-Attitudes and Deviant Behavior: New Directions for Theory and Research. Youth & Society, 14, 185-211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X82014002004
- Kothari, A., Edwards, N., Hamel, N., & Judd, M. (2009). Is Research Working for You? Validating a Tool to Examine the Capacity of Health Organizations to Use Research. Implementation Science, 4, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-46