Are Failure Rates on All Water Distribution Systems the Same? (Comparing Predictions among Nine Utilities in Southeast Florida)
- 1 Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatics Engineering, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA
- 2 Department of Mathematics, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA
- 3 Epic Engineering and Consulting Group, Orlando, FL, USA
- 4 Florida Technical Consultants, Inc., Boynton Beach, FL, USA
- 5 Florida Technical Consultants, Inc., Boynton Beach, FL, USA
Abstract
The goal of asset management is to identify and track the maintenance and identify the need for replacement of assets that have reached their useful life. For that reason, gathering data and collecting information is a critical step when developing an asset management plan. However, for buried infrastructure, information is often missing and due to its location, observing actual condition is not possible. Many entities lack the resources for examining buried infrastructure without destructive testing, so other methods of data collection are needed. The concept for this paper was to determine if utilities located in the same geographical vicinity could contribute data to develop regional scale predictive means to assess the likelihood of failure of buried potable water mains (failure defined as breaks). Such an effort would be more accessible to utilities and result in an easier means of assessment. The findings indicate that utilities located in the same area may differentiate themselves by pipe material, and the lack of data collection inhibits the ability to use predictive means with confidence.
- Arrow, K., & Kurz, M. (1970). Public Investment, the Rate of Return and Optimal Fiscal Policy . Johns Hopkins.
- ASCE (2001). 2001 Report Card for America’s Infrastructure .
- ASCE (2005). 2005 Report Card for America’s Infrastructure .
- ASCE (2009). 2009 Report Card for America’s Infrastructure . http://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/making-the-grade/report-card-history/2001-report-card/
- ASCE (2013). 2013 Report Card for America’s Infrastructure . http://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/
- ASCE (2017). 2017 Report Card for America’s Infrastructure . http://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/making-the-grade/report-card-history/2001-report-card/
- ASCE (2021). Report Card on America’s Infrastructure . https://infrastructurereportcard.org/
- Aschauer, D. (1989). Is Public Expenditure Productive? Journal of Monetary Economics, 23, 177-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(89)90047-0
- Aschauer, D. A. (1990). Why Is Infrastructure Important ? Conference Series; [Proceedings], Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, vol. 34, pages 21-68. https://ideas.repec.org/a/fip/fedbcp/y1990p21-68n34.html
- Bloetscher, F. (2019). Public Infrastructure Management: Tracking Inevitable Asset Challenges and Increasing System Resiliency . J Ross.
- Bloetscher, F., Farmer, Z., Barton, J., Chapman, T., Fonseca, P., & Shaner, M. (2023). Water System Condition and Asset Replacement Prioritization. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 15, 165-178. https://doi.org/10.4236/jwarp.2023.155010
- Bloetscher, F., Wander, L., Smith, G., & Dogon, N. (2017). Public Infrastructure Asset Assessment with Limited Data. Open Journal of Civil Engineering, 7, Article No. 79326. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojce.2017.73032
- Borcherding, T. E., & Deacon, R. T. (1972). The Demand for the Services of Non-Federal Governments. American Economic Review, 62, 842-853.
- Congressional Budget Office (CBO) (2015). Public Spending on Transportation and Water Infrastructure, 1956 to 2014 .
- Goldwater, D. (2010). An Important Tool for Asset Management. Utility Infrastructure Management: Journal of Finance and Management for Water and Wastewater Professional . http://mail.uimonline.com/index/webapp-stories-action/id.378/archive.yes/Issue.2010-04-01/title.rehabilitation