Analyzing the Relationship between Environmental Planning Policies and Climate Change: Multinomial Logit Regression Model Evaluation of Tarrant County, Texas
- 1 School of Urban and Public Affairs, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, USA
Abstract
Climate change is regarded as one of the greatest challenge human society is facing in this century. The debate on climate change raises the issue of the need to mainstream climate change mitigation in environmental planning. However this has remained research rhetoric and is not transformed to practice. One reason for this gap between research and environmental planning practice might be lack of empirical evidences that analyzes if a relationship between environmental planning policies and climate change mitigation exists. Most planners consent that cities have an ability to mitigate climate change by integrating and implementing environmental policies. However, lack of statistical studies supporting the ability of environmental planning policies in mitigating climate change might have probably halted the process of mainstreaming climate change mitigation in urban planning to some extent. This study evaluated 30 cities comprehensive plans in Tarrant County, Texas for the presence of environmental planning policies that focus on climate change mitigation. Multinomial logistic regression analysis signifies that city’s environmental planning policies have an ability to mitigate climate change. Thereby, this research has an implication for mainstreaming environmental planning policies in urban planning accordingly mitigate climate change from a local level perspective.
- Agyeman, J., Evans, B., & Kates, R. (1998). Greenhouse Gases Special: Thinking Locally in Science, Practice and Policy. Local Environment, 3, 245-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13549839808725563
- Bell, B. D. G. K., & Batterson, C. (1978). Service Utilization and Adjustment Patterns of Elderly Tornado Victims in an American Disaster. Mass Emergencies, 3, 71-81.
- Berke, P. R., Godschalk, D. R., Kaiser, E. J., & Rodriguez, D. (2006). Urban Land Use Planning (5th ed). Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
- Cervero, R., & Kockelman, K. (1997). Travel Demand and the 3DS: Density, Diversity, and Design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2, 199-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6
- Condon, P. M. (2010) Seven Rules for Sustainable Communities. Washington DC: Island Press.
- Ewing, R., & R. Cervero (2010). Travel and the Built Environment: A Synthesis. Transportation Research Record, 1780
- Ewing, R., Bartholomew, K., Winkelman, S., Walters, J., & Che, D. (2008). Growing Cooler: Evidence on Urban Development and Climate Change. Washington DC: ULI.
- Glaeser, E., & Kahn, M. (2008). The Greenness of Cities: Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Urban Development. UC Los Angeles: California Center for Population Research. http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/2pk7j5cp
- Godschalk, D. R., & Mills, W. E. (1996). A Collaborative Approach to Planning through Urban Activities. Journal of the American Planning Association, 32, 86-95.
- Grimm, N. B., Faeth, S. H., Golubiewski, N. E., Redman, C. L., Wu, J., Bai, X. Y., & Briggs, J. M. (2008). Global Change and the Ecology of Cities. Science, 319, 756-760. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1150195
- Hough, M. (2004). Cities and Natural Process: The Basis for Sustainability (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
- ICLEI (2005). International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives. http://www.iclei.org/
- IPCC (2007a). Climate Change 2007: Summary for Policymakers of the Synthesis Report of the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- IPCC (2007b). Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. In S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K. B. Averyt, M. Tignor, & H. L. Miller (Eds.), Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (p. 996). New York: Cambridge University Press.