A Framework to Identify Economic and Community Benefits of the Proposed BRT System in Southeast Michigan
- 1 Civil, Architectural, Environmental Engineering, University of Detroit Mercy, Detroit, MI, USA
Abstract
In recent years, Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) has generated great interest across the United States. There are more than 20 BRT systems in existence and more are in the planning stage (including Detroit). Within the next few years, BRT will be planned and implemented phase by phase in various parts of Southeast Michigan. The purpose of this paper is to present a framework to identify probable economic and community benefits (quantitative as well as qualitative) of BRT in Southeast Michigan. Taxable Real Estate property, employment sector, population age group, daily vehicle miles traveled, as well as congestion level data were reviewed to identify Southeast Michigan’s current and future trends. A Shift-Share analysis using data from Cleveland was performed to determine BRT-advantaged age group. The authors suggested a number of action items to attract choice riders and excite transit dependent riders to the planned BRT system. Based on the literature review and analysis, the authors identified BRT-advantaged job sectors and age-groups within the Southeast Michigan region. As BRT will be implemented in phases, it will affect the amount, type and time of investment. Considering this uncertainty in implementation, projected economic benefit as a function of type and amount of investment was presented. It is to be noted that in order to achieve the desired outcome the system must be planned/designed/implemented within the context of Southeast Michigan rather than just copying a successful system from somewhere else.
- Anderson, S. (2011). Rolling Rapid Transit. A Report by Anderson Consulting.
- APTA (2013). 2013 Transit Fact Book.
- Belzar, D. et al. (2011). Transit and Regional Economic Development. Oakland, CA, CTOD.
- Breakthrough Technologies Institute (2008). Bus Rapid Transit and Transit Oriented Development. Report, April 2008.
- Deng, T. et al. (2011). Recent Development in Bus Rapid Transit: A Review of Literature. Transport Reviews, 13.
- Detroit Transit Options for Growth Study (2007). Mode Choice Methodology Memorandum: A Correspondence from Tim Roseboom, Manager Strategic Planning Detroit Department of Transportation to Jennifer Evans. SEMCOG, 8 February 2007.
- Executive Office of the President Council of Economic Advisers (2009). Estimates of Job Creation from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. May 2009.
- General Accounting Office (GAO) (2012). Bus Rapid Transit Projects Improve Transit Service and Can Contribute to Economic Development. Report # GAO-12-811, July 2012.
- Gonsalves, J. (2012). What Is BRT. A Power Point Presentation by Parson Brinckerhoff Inc., 22 February 2012 at the National BRT Institute, University of South Florida.
- Kittelson & Associates (2007). Bus Rapid Transit Practitioner’s Guide. TCRP Report # 118, Washington DC.
- Nelson, A. C. et al. (2012). Bus Rapid Transit and Economic Development Case Study of the Eugene-Springfield, Oregon BRT System. Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board Meeting, Washington DC, January 2012.
- Park, V. et al. (2009). Land Use Impact of Bus Rapid Transit: Effects of BRT station Proximity on Property Values along the Pittsburgh Martin Luther King Jr. East Busway. FTA Report#FTA-FL-26-7109.2009.6, December 2009.
- Park, V. et al. (2012). Land Use Impact of Bus Rapid Transit: Phase II-Effects of BRT Station Proximity on Property Values along the Boston Silver Line Washington Corridor. FTA Report# 0022, July 2012.
- Regional Economic Models, Inc. (REMI) (Accessed 10 October 2015). http://www.remi.com/products/transight
- Weisbrod, G. et al. (2009). Economic Impact of Public Transportation Investment. Report Prepared for American Public Transportation Association, October 2009.
- Weisbrod, G., Cutler, D., & Duncan, C. (2014). Economic Impact of Public Transportation Investment: 2014 Update.