Unearthing Elements of Successful Park Master Planning: A Case Study of Belle Isle Park, Detroit, Michigan
- 1 Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
- 2 Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
Abstract
Does a well-designed master plan guarantee the future of a park? The answer to this question is not certain, which leads to asking what other factors contribute to the success or failure of master planning? Having a blueprint to guide the development of a park, often called a master plan, is commonly accepted as integral to park development. Belle Isle Park is the largest public park in Detroit. Since its establishment in 1880, the park has gone through dramatic social and economic changes, along with the City of Detroit. This case study takes Belle Isle’s unique history to identify possible factors that are significant to park development and success or failure of master planning. Despite the four master plans that were created for Belle Isle (by Frederick Law Olmsted, Dan Kiley and other design firms), the master plans did not significantly influence the actual growth of the park. Through this case study, four major factors, beyond good design, were identified that need to be taken into consideration throughout the entire process. These factors include: 1) permeability of location, access and spillover; 2) concordance of purpose, interests and decisions; 3) milieu of influencers, ideologies and consequences; and 4) connectedness of engagement, support and pride.
- Alexiou, A. S. (2006). Jane Jacobs: Urban Visionary. Toronto, Ontario: HarperCollins Publishers Ltd.
- Anderson, J. (2001). Island in the City: Belle Isle, Detroit’s Beautiful Island. Detroit: Detroit Historical Museum.
- Beveridge, C. E. (2000). Frederick Law Olmsted Sr., Landscape Architect, Author, Conservationist (1822–1903). http://www.olmsted.org/the-olmsted-legacy/frederick-law-olmsted-sr
- Chubb, M. (1972). Belle Isle Park User Pilot Study: A Report to the Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority. Detroit: Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority.
- Cranz, G. (1989). The Politics of Park Design: A History of Urban Parks in America. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Dahl, B., & Molnar, D. J. (2003). Anatomy of a Park: Essentials of Recreation Area Planning and Design. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press, Inc.
- Detroit Free Press (1975). Prettying Park: Landscape Architect to Study Belle Isle Face-Lift Potential. Detroit, MI: Detroit Free Press.
- Frumkin, H., Frank, L., & Jackson, R. (2004). Urban Sprawl and Public Health: Designing, Planning, and Building for Healthy Communities. Washington DC: Island Press.
- Gallagher, J. (2013). Fixing Belle Isle. Detroit, MI: Detroit Free Press.
- Garvin, A. (1996). The American City: What Works, What Doesn’t. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Garvin, A. (2011). Public Parks: The Key to Livable Communities. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
- Gay, C. Y. (2013). Lost Detroit. London: Pavilion Books.
- Geoffrey, G., & Mowen, A. (2010). The Benefits of Physical Activity Provided by Park and Recreation Services: The Scientific Evidence. http://www.nrpa.org/uploadedFiles/nrpa.org/Publications_and_Research/Research/Papers/Godbey-Mowen-Research-Paper.pdf
- Hall, P. (2002). Urban and Regional Planning. New York: Routledge.
- Hamilton Anderson Associates (2006). Belle Isle Master Plan. Detroit: Hamilton Anderson Associates.
- Harnik, P. (2006). The Excellent City Park System: What Makes It Great and How to Get There. In R. H. Platt (Ed.), The Humane Metropolis: People and Nature in the 21st Century City (pp. 47-60). Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
- Justus, J. (2002). A History of Belle Isle. Detroit: Friends of Belle Isle.