Community-Police Relations and Informant Identity Protection: Evidence from Some Selected Communities in the Brong-Ahafo Region, Ghana — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Community-Police Relations and Informant Identity Protection: Evidence from Some Selected Communities in the Brong-Ahafo Region, Ghana
Department of Sociology and Social Work, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
,
Institute of Distance Learning, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
,
Department of Sociology and Social Work, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
,
Department of Sociology and Social Work, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
1 Department of Sociology and Social Work, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
2 Institute of Distance Learning, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
3 Department of Sociology and Social Work, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
4 Department of Sociology and Social Work, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana
For effective crime control, the roles of informants are critical. The police and community members’ relation is needed for the police continuous reliance on informants’ information on crime. This has been the principle for fighting crime in many parts of the developed countries in the World. The study sought to examine the relations between community and police in providing protection for informants in crime investigation within communities (Tepa and Hwediem) in Brong-Ahafo Region, placing much emphasis on the relationship between community members and police in providing information for combating crime, the effectiveness of informants’ information in fighting crime and measures that could improve the relationship between community members and police in protecting informants. Social survey design was adopted. Cluster sampling and simple random were used to select 400 respondents (community members and police). Quantitative approach was adopted. The study found that informants were relatively fewer in the community. The study found that respondents who reported criminal cases to the police indicated that their act was very important in fighting crime. It was concluded that a good relationship between community members and police was needed to protect informants. The results showed that majority of the respondents strongly agreed informants’ identities should not be revealed to suspects. The researchers recommended that since effective communication is fundamental to positive police-community relationships, the Government and Ghana Police Service (GPS) should seek to provide it s officers with an understanding of language diversity. The researchers then again recommended that officers of the GPS should be provided with an in-service training by the Government and GPS to improve community policing and trust building.
KeywordsPoliceInformantCommunityCrime
Adkins, T. E. (2007). Informant Polygraph Testing. Polygraph, 16, 106-115.
Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (2008). Constructions of Deviance (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Becker, H. (2009). Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: Free Press.
Becker, H. (2013). Becoming a Marihuana User. American Journal of Sociology, 59, 235-242. https://doi.org/10.1086/221326
Benson, M. L. (2015). Denying the Guilty Mind: Accounting for Involvement in a White Collar Crime. Criminology, 23, 589-599.
Bergstrom, K. (2015). Police Experimentation with Civilian Subjects: Formalizing the Informal. In Police Leadership in America: Crisis and Opportunity. New York: Praeger.
Billingsley, R., Nemitz, T., & Bean, P. (Eds.) (2001). Informers: Policing, Policy, Practice. Cullompton, UK: Willan.
Blackmore, J. (2014). The Relationship between Self-Reported Delinquency and Official Convictions amongst Adolescent Boys. British Journal of Criminology, 14, 172-176. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a046535
Bloom, R. (2002). Ratting: The Use and Abuse of Informants in the American Justice System. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Blumer, H. (2009). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Boulette, T. R., & Andersen, S. M. (2015). Mind Control and the Battering of Women. Community Mental Health Journal, 21, 109-118. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00754370
Brock-Utne, B. (2015). Educating for Peace. New York: Pergamon Press.
Brown, E. (2007). Snitch: Informants, Cooperators, and the Corruption of Justice. New York: Public Affairs.
Caldero, M. A., & Crank, J. P. (2010). Police Ethics: The Corruption of Noble Cause (2nd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson Publishing.
Chatterton, M. R. (2009). Managing Paperwork. In M. Weatheritt (Ed.), Police Research: Some Future Prospects (pp. 107-136). Aldershot, England: Avebury.
Clark, J., & Tiff, L. (2016). Polygraph and Interview Validation of Self-Reported Deviant Behavior. American Sociological Review, 31, 516-523. https://doi.org/10.2307/2090775
Deflem, M. (2002). Policing World Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Donnelly, R. C. (2011). Judicial Control of Informants, Spies, Stool Pigeons, and Agent Provocateurs. The Yale Law Journal, 60, 1091-1131. https://doi.org/10.2307/793692
Dorn, N., Murji, K., & South, N. (1992). Traffickers: Drug Markets and Law Enforcement. London: Routledge.
Fitzgerald, D. (2007). Informants and Undercover Investigations: A Practical Guide to Law, Policy and Procedure. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780849304132
Gardiner, P. A. (2002). Criminal Investigation’s Use of Confidential Funds for Undercover Operations Is Appropriate; However, Certain Aspects of Undercover Operations Need Improvement. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
Geberth, V. J. (2009). Confidential Informant. Law and Order, 27, 38-41.
Goddard, D. (2008). Undercover: The Secret Lives of a Federal Agent. New York: Times Books.
Goffman, E. (2013). Stigma. Englewood Heights, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Goffman, E. (2014). Frame Analysis. New York: Harper & Row.
Harney, M. L., & Cross, J. C. (2008). The Informer in Law Enforcement (2nd ed.). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Hartley, R. D., Maddan, S., & Spohn, C. (2007). Prosecutorial Discretion: An Examination of Substantial Assistance Departures in Federal Crack-Cocaine and Powder-Cocaine Cases. Justice Quarterly, 24, 382-407. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820701485379
Hutchins, M. (2006). Informants: Protecting Their Identity. Point of View: Journal of the Alameda District Attorney’s Office.
Jacobs, B. A. (2003). Undercover Deception Clues: A Case of Restrictive Deterrence. Criminology, 31, 281-299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1993.tb01131.x
Jacobs, B. A. (2007). Contingent Ties: Undercover Drug Officers’ Use of Informants. British Journal of Sociology, 48, 35-53. https://doi.org/10.2307/591909
Jacobs, B. A. (2013). Getting Narced: Neutralization of Undercover Identity Discreditation. Deviant Behavior, 14, 187-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.1993.9967939
Janzen, S. (1992). Informants and Undercover Investigations. Washington DC: U.S. Bureau of Justice Assistance.
Lum, C., & Nagin, D. S. (2017). Reinventing American Policing. Crime and Justice, 46, 339-393. https://doi.org/10.1086/688462
Manning, P. K. (2004). The Narc’s Game: Organizational and Informational Limits on Drug Law Enforcement (2nd ed.). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
McCall, G. (2008). Observing the Law. New York: Free Press.
Miller, J. M. (2011). Becoming an Informant. Justice Quarterly, 28, 203-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2010.506881
Miller, J. M., & Selva, L. H. (1994). Drug Enforcement’s Double-Edged Sword: An Assessment of Asset Forfeiture Programs. Justice Quarterly, 11, 313-335. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829400092271
Mills, C. W. (2010). Situated Actions and Vocabularies of Motive. American Sociological Review, 5, 904-913. https://doi.org/10.2307/2084524
Mount Jr., H. A. (2011). Criminal Informants: An Administrator’s Dream or Nightmare. Prosecutor, 24, 23-26.
Nugent, H., Leahy, F. J., & Connors, E. F. (2011). Managing Confidential Informants. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
Osterburg, J. W., & Ward, R. H. (2012). Criminal Investigation: A Method for Reconstructing the Past. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315721866
Palmiotto, M. (2014). Confidential Informant: Management and Control. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
Pfuhl Jr., E. H. (1992). The Legitimation of Snitching. Justice Quarterly, 9, 505-528. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829200091501
Poltilove, J. (2009). Rachel’s Law on Confidential Informants Takes Effect Wednesday. The Tampa Tribune.
Rosenfeld, R., Jacobs, B., & Wright, R. (2003). Snitching and the Code of the Street. British Journal of Criminology, 43, 291-309. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/43.2.291
Schneider, S. K. (2008). Art of Darkness: Street Acting by Undercover Operators, Con Men, and Others. Chicago, IL: Cuneiform Books.
Schreiber, A. J. (2001). Dealing with the Devil: An Examination of the FBI’s Troubled Relationship with its Confidential Informants. Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems, 34, 301-368.
Schulhofer, S. J. (2013). Rethinking Mandatory Minimums. Wake Forest Law Review, 28, 211-12.
Scott, M. B., & Lyman, S. M. (2008). Accounts. American Sociological Review, 33, 46-62. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092239
Skolnick, J. H. (2016). Justice without Trial: Law Enforcement in Democratic Society. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (2007). Techniques of Neutralization: A Theory of Delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22, 664-670. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089195
Weiss, M. W. (2016). Traffic Enforcement, Policing, and Crime Rates. Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies. Walden University.
Wisotsky, S. (1986). Breaking the Impasse in the War on Drugs. Westport, CN: Greenwood Press.