Residents’ Attitudes towards the Built Environment in Historic Parklands in Nairobi, Kenya
- 1 Center for Urban Studies, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya
- 2 Center for Urban Studies, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya
- 3 Department of Landscape Architecture, Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi, Kenya
Abstract
Contemporary attitudes shaping urban areas are not always sympathetic to the historic character of built heritage, meaning heritage contexts are subject to loss of scale, visual quality and associated values. This study sought to identify attitudes associated with this built heritage in order to establish community values necessary for the urban conservation of Historic Parklands in Nairobi. The Cultural Worldview (CV) scale was used to assess attitudinal preferences for the built environment among 302 respondents who were asked to rate 32 statement items on a 7-degree Likert scale designed for responses. Statements with shared variances were grouped together under factor analysis and the degree of variability within shared variances distilled 3 attitudinal preference dimensions. From the rated attitudinal statements, the identified preference dimensions included the following; One, cultural heritage loss which scored a high mean of 5.29 perceived as the disappearance of architectural, historic and aesthetic values. Two, cultural heritage recognition which scored a mean of 4.79 confirming that heritage assets were acknowledged as important legible site markers. Three, cultural heritage linkage which scored a mean of 4.34 supported by the perceived associational, cultural and social values. This study recommends three action points. First, a heritage monitoring database that assigns the priorities of preservation, rehabilitation and adaptive-reuse to mitigate cultural heritage loss. Second, buffer zones to classify and protect recognized built heritage from unplanned urban growth process. Third, a heritage walk to foster the interactions between residents, visitors and the host place in order to reinforce the interpretation qualities of built heritage responsible for enhancing history, community values and collective identity.
- Australia ICOMOS (1999). The Burra Charter, The Australia ICOMOS Charter for Places of Cultural Significance. Australia ICOMOS Inc.
- Choi, S., & Fielding, K. S. (2016). Cultural Attitudes WTP Determinants. Sustainability, 8, 570.
- De la Torre, M. (2013). Values and Heritage Conservation. Heritage & Society, 6, 155-166. https://doi.org/10.1179/2159032X13Z.00000000011
- Fielden, B. (2003). Conservation of Historic Buildings. London: Architectural Press.
- Jokilehto, J. (2007). International Charters on Urban Conservation: Some Thoughts on the Principles Expressed in Current International Doctrine. City Time.
- Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (1982). Cognition and Environment: Functioning in an Uncertain World. New York: Praeger.
- Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (KNBS) and Society for International Development (SID) (2013). Exploring Kenya’s Inequality: Pulling Apart or Polling Together. County and National Reports.
- Khalaf, R. W. (2016). Architectural Compatibility beyond the Eye of the Beholder. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 6, 238-254. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCHMSD-07-2015-0028
- Kothari, C. (1985). Research Methodology Methods and Techniques. New Delhi: Wishwa Prakashan.
- Najd, D., Ismail, N. A., Maulan, S., Mohd Yunos, M. Y., & Dabbagh Niya, M. (2015). Visual Preference Dimensions of Historic Urban Areas: The Determinants for Urban Heritage Conservation. Habitat International, 49, 115-125. https://www.elsevier.com/locate/habitatint https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.05.003
- Riegl, A. (1982). The Modem Cult of Monuments: Its Character and Its Origin, Oppositions.
- Schofield, J. (2009). Being Auto Centric: Towards Symmetry in Heritage Management Practices in Valuing Historic Environments.
- Van Oers, R., & Pereira Roders, A. (2012). Historic cities as model of sustainability. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 2, 4-14. https://doi.org/10.1108/20441261211223298
- Vinas, M. S. (2005). Contemporary Theory of Conservation. London: Elsevier.
- Zancheti, S. M., & Jokilehto, J. (2014). Values and Urban Conservation Planning: Some Reflections on Principles and Definitions. Journal of Architectural Conservation, 3, 37-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556207.1997.10785179