Optimal Kelly Portfolio under Risk Constraints
- 1 School of Science, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, China
- 2 School of Science, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, China
- 3 School of Science, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, China
Abstract
The Kelly strategy is renowned for its theoretically optimal long-term growth, however, its practical application in financial markets is constrained by several limitations, including high-risk exposure and the absence of clearly defined profit-loss ratios. These challenges make it difficult to widely adopt the Kelly strategy, especially in market characterized by high volatility. To address these issues, this paper integrates contraction estimation and ridge regression techniques into the Kelly framework. By quantifying portfolio unit risk and incorporating it as a penalty term in the optimization model, we refine the asset allocation process. Additionally, machine learning methods are employed to enhance portfolio construction, where clustering is used for asset selection, and neural networks are applied to predict return performance. Empirical analysis using data from the A-share stock market demonstrates that the proposed approach not only preserves the high return potential of the Kelly strategy, but also effectively mitigates the risks associated with market volatility, delivering superior performance in medium-term to long-term investments.
- Markowitz, H. (1952) Portfolio Selection. The Journal of Finance , 7, 77-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1952.tb01525.x
- Roll, R. (1973) Varying Beta Estimates and the Behavior of Stock Prices. The Journal of Finance , 28, 917-930.
- Kelly, J.L. (1956) A New Interpretation of Information Rate. Bell System Technical Journal , 35, 917-926. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1956.tb03809.x
- Latane, B. (1959) The Dangers of Overconfidence in Group Decision Making. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology , 58, 267-275.
- Hakansson, N.H. and Miller, M.H. (1975) The Theory of Investment Value. The Journal of Finance , 30, 555-576.
- Breiman, L. (1961) Principal Components Analysis and SVD. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics , 32, 1-11.
- Cover, T.M. (1988) Maximum Likelihood Estimates of the Entropy of a Multivariate Distribution. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory , 34, 1121-1126.
- Ziemba, W.T. and Hausch, D.B. (1986) The Effect of Risk Aversion on Portfolio Performance. The Journal of Portfolio Management , 12, 25-30.
- Michaud, R.O. (1989) The Markowitz Optimization Enigma: Is ‘Optimized’ Optimal? Financial Analysts Journal , 45, 31-42. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v45.n1.31
- Xidonas, P., Kourentzes, N. and Psarakis, S. (2017) Forecasting Stock Market Indices Using Support Vector Regression and Ensemble Learning. Expert Systems with Ap-plications , 88, 233-247.
- Green, R.C. and Hollifield, B. (1992) The Effect of Market Frictions on Portfolio Optimization. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , 27, 397-420.
- Shen, Y., Harris, N.C., Skirlo, S., Prabhu, M., Baehr-Jones, T., Hochberg, M., et al . (2017) Deep Learning with Coherent Nanophotonic Circuits. Nature Photonics , 11, 441-446. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2017.93
- DeMiguel, V., Garlappi, L. and Uppal, R. (2007) Optimal versus Naive Diversification: How Inefficient Is the 1/ N Portfolio Strategy? Review of Financial Studies , 22, 1915-1953. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm075
- Kritzman, M. (2010) Risk Parity and Risk Budgeting: How to Create a Better Portfolio. The Journal of Portfolio Management , 36, 37-49.
- Ledoit, O. and Wolf, M.N. (2003) Honey, I Shrunk the Sample Covariance Matrix. The Journal of Portfolio Management , 29, 24-36.