With increasing freshwater demand and rising water scarcity, reverse osmosis (RO) has become a key method for seawater desalination; however, accurately modeling RO remains challenging due to its complex, nonlinear processes. This study develops a new mass transport model by coupling the Advection-Diffusion Model (ADM) with the Solution-Diffusion Model (SDM), and it is solved by using the Finite Element Method (FEM) with the linear stiffness approach. The extended ADM-SDM framework combines both advective and diffusive transport forces and calculates osmotic pressure. The model is validated against COMSOL simulations and commercial RO module data, finding accurate prediction of solute concentration and permeate flux, with errors as low as 0.7% for SW30-2514 and 2.6% for SW30-4021 compared to commercial RO module data. Unlike the traditional SDM, the extended ADM-SDM framework captures advective transport effects, leading to improved permeate flux estimation while maintaining 100% salt rejection. The numerical stability was further validated by mesh sensitivity analysis, which also demonstrated the robustness and effectiveness of the FEM stiffness implementation by showing that outlet flux errors successfully converged to zero across refinements.
KeywordsAdvection-Diffusion ModelNernst-Planck ModelFinite Element MethodStiffness Matrix MethodMesh Sensitivity AnalysisNet Driving Force Pressure
Ang, W.L. and Mohammad, A.W. (2015) Mathematical Modeling of Membrane Operations for Water Treatment. In: Basile, A., Cassano, A. and Rastogi, N.K., Eds., Advances in Membrane Technologies for Water Treatment , Elsevier, 379-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-78242-121-4.00012-5
Giorno, L., Strathmann, H. and Drioli, E. (2015) Mathematical Description of Mass Transport in Membranes. In: Drioli, E. and Giorno, L., Eds., Encyclopedia of Membranes , Springer, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40872-4_2224-1
Liu, L. (2018) Application of a Hydrodynamic and Water Quality Model for Inland Surface Water Systems. In: Malcangio, D., Ed., Applications in Water Systems Management and Modeling , InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.74914
Ault, J.T. and Shin, S. (2025) Physicochemical Hydrodynamics of Particle Diffusiophoresis Driven by Chemical Gradients. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics , 57, 227-255. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-030424-110950
Ayrapetyan, S. (2020) The Quantum-Mechanical Sensitive Na/k Pump Is a Key Mechanism for the Metabolic Control of Neuronal Membrane Function. Open Journal of Biophysics , 10, 59-83. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbiphy.2020.102006
Tiraferri, A., Malaguti, M., Mohamed, M., Giagnorio, M. and Aschmoneit, F.J. (2023) Standardizing Practices and Flux Predictions in Membrane Science via Simplified Equations and Membrane Characterization. npj Clean Water , 6, Article No. 58. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41545-023-00270-w
Dai, R., Yang, Z., Qiu, Z., Long, L., Tang, C.Y. and Wang, Z. (2022) Distinct Impact of Substrate Hydrophilicity on Performance and Structure of TFC NF and RO Polyamide Membranes. Journal of Membrane Science , 662, Article ID: 120966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2022.120966
Giorno, L. and Drioli, E. (2000) Biocatalytic Membrane Reactors: Applications and Perspectives. Trends in Biotechnology , 18, 339-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-7799(00)01472-4
Marx, D., Joss, L., Hefti, M. and Mazzotti, M. (2016) Temperature Swing Adsorption for Postcombustion CO 2 Capture: Single-and Multicolumn Experiments and Simulations. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research , 55, 1401-1412. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b03727
Tsirlin, A.M. (2023) Thermodynamic Analysis of Irreversible Processes of the Reverse Osmosis and Diffusion Machines. Journal of Engineering Physics and Thermophysics , 96, 555-567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10891-023-02717-w
Du, Y., Wang, Z., Cooper, N.J., Gilron, J. and Elimelech, M. (2022) Module-scale Analysis of Low-Salt-Rejection Reverse Osmosis: Design Guidelines and System Performance. Water Research , 209, Article ID: 117936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117936
Matsuura, T., Guiver, M.D., Lau, W.J. and Ismail, A.F. (2025) Transport in Reverse Osmosis Membranes: Observations and Comments on the Pore Flow Model versus the Solution-Diffusion Model. Frontiers in Membrane Science and Technology , 4, Article 1513591. https://doi.org/10.3389/frmst.2025.1513591
Wang, L., Cao, T., Dykstra, J.E., Porada, S., Biesheuvel, P.M. and Elimelech, M. (2021) Salt and Water Transport in Reverse Osmosis Membranes: Beyond the Solution-Diffusion Model. Environmental Science & Technology , 55, 16665-16675. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c05649
Biesheuvel, P.M., Porada, S., Elimelech, M. and Dykstra, J.E. (2022) Tutorial Review of Reverse Osmosis and Electrodialysis. Journal of Membrane Science , 647, Article ID: 120221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2021.120221
Taylor, R.F., Martinez-Jimenez, F. and Logan, B.E. (2025) Tuning Initial pH to Decrease Salt Ion Transport in Saltwater Electrolysis. Electrochemistry Communications , 171, Article ID: 107858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2024.107858
Zhang, L., Hamelers, H.V.M. and Biesheuvel, P.M. (2020) Modeling Permeate Ph in RO Membranes by the Extended Donnan Steric Partitioning Pore Model. Journal of Membrane Science , 613, Article ID: 118511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2020.118511
Siva Prasad Reddy, B.V. and Rajesh Babu, K. (2016) Application of Variational Methods and Galerkin Method in Solving Engineering Problems Represented by Ordinary Differential Equations. P roceedings of IRF International Conference , Goa, 28th February 2016, 36-37. https://www.digitalxplore.org/up_proc/pdf/206-145672797836-41.pdf
Nguyen, V.P., Rabczuk, T., Bordas, S. and Duflot, M. (2008) Meshless Methods: A Review and Computer Implementation Aspects. Mathematics and Computers in Sim ulation , 79, 763-813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2008.01.003
Hansen, M.S. (2013) Boundary Conditions for 3D Fluid-Structure Interaction Simulations of Compliant Vessels (By Norwegian University of Science and Technology). https://leifh.folk.ntnu.no/alumni/2013_Merethe_Sirevaag_Hansen.pdf
Dougaj4 (2017) Stepping through 3DFrame. Newton Excel Bach, not (Just) an Excel Blog. https://newtonexcelbach.com/2017/09/16/stepping-through-3dframe/
Moradi, N., Liu, B., Iversen, M., Kuypers, M.M., Ploug, H. and Khalili, A. (2018) A New Mathematical Model to Explore Microbial Processes and Their Constraints in Phytoplankton Colonies and Sinking Marine Aggregates. Science Advances , 4, eaat1991. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat1991
Lee, S. (2025) Numerical Solution of PDEs for Chemical Engineers. Number Analytics. https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/numerical-solution-of-pdes-for-chemical-engineers
Kolar-Požun, A. AND Kosec, G. (2025) A Meshless Method for Computational Electromagnetics with Improved Dispersion Properties. arXiv: 2508.18205. https://arxiv.org/html/2508.18205v1
Okamoto, Y. and Lienhard, J.H. (2019) How RO Membrane Permeability and Other Performance Factors Affect Process Cost and Energy Use: A Review. Desalination , 470, Article ID: 114064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2019.07.004
Hadadian, Z., Zahmatkesh, S., Ansari, M., Haghighi, A. and Moghimipour, E. (2021) Mathematical and Experimental Modeling of Reverse Osmosis (RO) Process. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering , 38, 366-379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-020-0697-9
El-Brol, A., Ahmed, E., EL-Samadony, Y., Hammad, F. and Ismaeil, K. (2023) Experimental and Theoretical Study on Reverse Osmosis Based Water Desalination. Journal of Engineering Research , 7, Article 26. https://doi.org/10.21608/erjeng.2023.234375.1230
Jung, O., Saravia, F., Wagner, M., Heißler, S. and Horn, H. (2019) Quantifying Concentration Polarization—Raman Microspectroscopy for In - Situ Measurement in a Flat Sheet Cross-Flow Nanofiltration Membrane Unit. Scientific Reports , 9, Article No. 15885. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52369-1
Tayeh, Y.A., Alazaiza, M.Y.D., Alzghoul, T.M. and Bashir, M.J. (2025) A Comprehensive Review of RO Membrane Fouling: Mechanisms, Categories, Cleaning Methods and Pretreatment Technologies. Journal of Hazardous Materials Advances , 18, Article ID: 100684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazadv.2025.100684