Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
The Empirical Prediction of Gas Dispersion Parameters on Mechanical Flotation Cells
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
Copy link · social · email
Abstract
Gas dispersion properties include bubble size ( ), gas holdup ( ) and bubble surface area flux ( ) and input power ( ) are effective parameters on flotation performance. During the last 10 years, some investigations have been carried out to measure these parameters in mechanical flotation cells. In this research, some models are created to estimate gas dispersion properties and input power by experimental data. Variables of models are impeller peripheral speed ( ), superficial gas velocity ( ) and pulp density ( ) and final form of models are , , and . According to these equations, most effective variables are , and , respectively.
KeywordsGas DispersionInput PowerEmpirical Estimation and Flotation
- J. A. Finch, J. Xiao, C. Hardie and C. O. Gomez, “Gas Disper-sion Properties: Bubble Surface Area Flux and Gas Holdup,” Minerals Engineering, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2000, pp. 365-372. doi:10.1016/S0892-6875(00)00019-4
- G. J. Jameson, S. Narn and M. Young, “Physical Factors Affecting Recovery Rates in Flotation,” Mineral Science Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 3, 1977, pp. 103-118.
- B. K. Gorain, J. P. Franzidis and E. V. Manlapig, “Studies on Impeller Type, Impeller Speed and Air Flow Rate in an Industrial Scale Flotation Cell. Part 1: Effect on Bubble Size Distribution,” Minerals Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 6, 1995, pp. 615-635. doi:10.1016/0892-6875(95)00025-L
- B. K. Gorain, J. P. Franzidis and E. V. Manlapig, “Studies on Impeller Type, Im-peller Speed and Air Flow Rate in an Industrial Scale Flotation Cell. Part 2: Effect on Gas Holdup,” Minerals Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 12, 1995, pp. 1557-1570. doi:10.1016/0892-6875(95)00118-2
- B. K. Gorain, J. P. Franzidis and E. V. Manlapig, “Studies on Impeller Type, Im-peller Speed and Air Flow Rate in an Industrial Scale Flotation Cell. Part 3: Effect on Superficial Gas Velocity,” Minerals Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 6, 1996, pp. 639-654. doi:10.1016/0892-6875(96)00052-0
- B. K. Gorain, J. P. Franzidis and E. V. Manlapig, “Studies on Impeller Type, Im-peller Speed and Air Flow Rate in an Industrial: Scale Flotation Cell. Part 4: Effect of Bubble Surface Area Flux on Flotation Kinetics,” Minerals Engineering, Vol. 10, No. 4, 1997, pp. 367-379. doi:10.1016/S0892-6875(97)00014-9
- E. H. Girgin, S. Do, C. O. Gomez and J. A. Finch, “Bubble Size as a Function of Impeller Speed in a Self-Aeration Laboratory Flotation Cell,” Minerals Engineering, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2006, pp. 201-203. doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2005.09.002
- B. K. Gorain, J. P. Franzidis and E. V. Manlapig, “The Empirical Prediction of Bubble Surface Area Flux in Mechanical Flotation Cells from Cell Design and Operating Data,” Minerals Engineering, Vol. 12, No. 3, 1999, pp. 309-322. doi:10.1016/S0892-6875(99)00008-4
- R. D. Nevett, “Some Controlling Factors in Flotation,” Proceed-ings—Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Vol. 37, No. 37, 1920, pp. 55-72.
- B. Shahbazi, B. Rezai and S. M. Javad Koleini, “The Effect of Hydrodynamic Parameters on Probability of Bubble-Particle Collision and Attachment,” Minerals Engineering, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2009, pp. 57-63. doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2008.03.013
- B. Shahbazi, B. Rezai and S. M. Javad Koleini, “Bubble-Particle Collision and At-tachment Probability on Fine Particles Flotation,” Chemical Engineering and Processing, Vol. 49, No. 6, 2010, pp. 622-627. doi:10.1016/j.cep.2010.04.009