Motor Imagery did not Improve Strength of Biceps Brachii
- 1 College of Health Science, Wuhan Sports University, Wuhan, China
- 2
Abstract
Numerous studies have confirmed that motor imagery may result in plastic change in motor system as actual physical activity. However, whether motor imagery can improve muscle strength of the trained persons remains unclear. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of motor imagery on muscle strength. Totally 12 healthy college students were involved in 4 weeks of mental rehearsal of right upper limb movements (flexion and extension of elbow) during 30 min supervision session three times a week. Electromyogram (EMG) and peak torque of biceps brachii , reaction time of subjects were analyzed. Results showed that no significant change in EMG of biceps brachii was observed during motor imagery. After motor rehearsal for 4 weeks, statistically significant difference in EMG, peak torque and reactivity were not observed ( P > 0.05) when compared with the baseline data. Therefore, motor imagery could not enhance muscle strength of subjects. Whether mental practice is a valid rehabilitation technique needs to be investigated further.
- T. Mulder. “Motor imagery and action observation: cognitive tools for rehabilition,” J Neural Transm, vol.114(10), pp.1265-1278, 2007.
- M. Lotze, L.G. Cohen, “Volition and imagery in neurorehabilition,” Cogn Behav Neurol, vol.19(3), pp.135-140, 2006.
- A. Lucía, J. Hoyos, J.L. Chicharro, “The slow component of VO2 in professional cyclists,” Br J Sports Med, vol.34, pp.367-374, 2000.
- M. Fiori, M. Tinazzi, S.M. Aglioti, “Selective impairment of hand mental rotation in patients with focal hand dystonia,” Brain, vol.129(1), pp.47-54, 2006.
- J.R. Maring, “Effects of mental practice on rate of skill acquisition,” Phys Ther, vol. 70(3), pp.165-72, 1990.
- T. Mulder, S. Zijlstra, W.Zijlstra, J. Hochstenbach, “The role of motor imagery in learning a totally novel movement,” Exper Brain Res, vol. 154(2), pp.211-217, 2004.
- T. Liu, P. Xu, Q. Yu, DZ. Yao, “The Research and Progress in the Mechanism of Motor Imagery and its Application in Motor Rehabilitation,” Prog.Biochem.Biophys. pp.1-8, 2011.
- K.P. Liu, C.C. Chan, T.M. Lee, C.W. Hui-Chan, “Mental imagery for promoting relearning for people after stroke: a randomized controlled trial,” Arch Physi Med Rehabil, vol. 85, pp.1403–1408, 2004.
- R.Grush, “The emulation theory of representation: motor control, imagery and perception,” Behav Brain Sci, vol. 27(3), pp.377-396, 2004.
- F. Filimon, J.D. Nelson, D.J. Hagler, M.I. Sereno, “Human cortical representations for reaching: mirror neurons for execution, observation, and imagery,” Neuroimage, vol. 37(4), pp.1315–1328, 2007.
- F.Binkofski, K.Amunts, K.M. Stephan, S. Posse, T. Schormann, H.J. Freund, et al. “Broca's region subserves imagery of motion: a combined cytoarchitectonic and fMRI study,” Hum Brain Mapp. vol.11(4), pp.273-285, 2000.
- E. Gerardin，A. Sirigu，S. Lehericy, J.B. Poline, B. Gaymard, C. Marsault, et al. “Partially overlapping neural networks for real and imagined hand movements,” Cereb Cortex，vol.10, pp.1093-1104, 2000.
- C.M. Stinear, W.D. Byblow, M. Steyvers, O. Levin, S.P. Swinnen, “Kinesthetic, but not visual, motor imagery modulates corticomotor excitability,” Exp Brain Res, vol. 168(1-2) , pp.157-164, 2006.
- J.L. Campos, J.H. Siegle, B.J. Mohler, H.H. Bülthoff, J.M. Loomis, “Imagined Self-Motion Differs from Perceived Self-Motion: Evidence from a Novel Continuous Pointing Method,” PLoS One, Vol.4(11), pp. e7793-2009.