Analysis of Stress Backlogs during Case-File Processing in Forensic Science Laboratory
- 1 Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Dar es Salaam, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
- 2 Government Chemist Laboratory Authority, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
- 3 Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Dar es Salaam, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
Abstract
Case-file backlogs were identified as one of the cause factors affecting the competitiveness of the forensic science laboratory (FSL). Backlogs represent case-files that remain unprocessed or unreported within a selected time interval (year, week or month) which leads to increased customer complaints, rework, cost of analysis, degradation of biological samples, etc. Case-file backlogging was quantified in three consecutive years (2014 to 2016), using the following parameters: case-files received and case-files processed, difference of which gives case-files backlogged. There was a need to define time interval for a case-file to be regarded as backlogged (that is, one week), results of which can translate into backlogged case-files per month or year. A data collection tool was established and used for three work stations (forensic chemistry, biology/DNA and toxicology laboratories). The t ool includes starting and ending date for each time interval, in which the number s of case-files received and processed w ere entered followed by computing the backlogs. It was observed that, case-files reported increased between 2014 and 2016 leading to a decrease in backlogged case-files. The annual percentage of the case-files backlogged was highest for forensic toxicology. The highest number of case-files backlogged was observed for forensic chemistry, followed by forensic biology/DNA. The number of case-files backlogged per analyst per year was highest in 2014 and dropped continuously towards 2016, being comparably higher in forensic biology/DNA and chemistry. Probability density functions (PDFs) and cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) of backlogs data indicated that a large number of backlogs created in previous weeks were eliminated. It was concluded that the effect of case-file backlogging on FSL competitiveness can be minimized by continued management effort in backlog elimination.
- Bashinski, J. (2010) DNA Laboratory Monthly Statistics, Sacramento, California, Office of the Attorney General, California Department of Justice. http://ag.ca.gov/bfs/pdf/Monthly.pdf
- CCLRTF (2009) California Crime Laboratory Review Task Force. Hertzberg-Davis Forensic Science Center, Los Angeles.
- Coble, M.D. and Butler, J.M. (2005) Characterization of New MiniSTR Loci to Aid Analysis of Degraded DNA. Journal of Forensic Science, 50, 43-53. https://doi.org/10.1520/JFS2004216
- Davis, K. (2010) Not All Rape Kits Must Be Tested, Laboratory Chief Says. San Diego Union-Tribune. http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2009/dec/12/not-all-rape-kits-must-be-tested-lab-chief-says/
- Delisi, M., Hochstetler, A., Scherer, A.M., Purhmann, A. and Mark, B.T. (2008) The Stark Weather Syndrome: Exploring Criminal History Antecedents of Homicidal Crime Sprees. Criminal Justice Studies, 21, 37-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786010801972670
- Durose, M.R. (2008) Census of Publicly Funded Crime Forensic Crime Laboratories, 2005. US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics Bulletin, Washington DC.
- Feist, A., Ashe, J., Lawrence, J., McPhee, D. and Wilson, R. (2007) Investigating and Detecting Recorded Offences of Rape. Home Office, London. https://doi.org/10.1037/e468392008-001
- Foullla, J., Mathies, C., Disley E. and Steinberg, P. (2010) Towards a Comparison of DNA Profiling and Databases in the United States and England. Land Center on Quality Policing, Technical Report.
- Hurst, L. and Lothridge, K. (2010) DNA Evidence and Offender Analysis Measurement: DNA Backlogs, Capacity, and Funding. US Department of Justice, Washington DC. http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/230328.pdf
- Kara, V. and Skender, L. (2000) Drugs of Abuse in Urine. Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, 51, 389-400.
- Lovrich, N.P., Gaffney, M.J., Pratt, T.C., Johnson, C.L., Asplen, C.H., Hurst L.H. and Schellberg, T.M. (2004) National Forensic DNA Study Report: Final Report. Washington State University, Division of Governmental Studies and Services, Pullman, Document 203970. http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/203970.pdf
- Manyele, S.V. (2017) Optimization of Evidence Analysis Cost Using Arbitrary Re-Sampling Techniques for Sample Influx into Forensic Science Laboratory. Engineering, 9, 457-481. https://doi.org/10.4236/eng.2017.95027