Numerical Feasibility Study of a Wax Cold Flow Approach for Subsea Tie-In Flowlines Using a 1D Mechanistic Multiphase Flow Simulator
- 1 Department of Geoscience and Petroleum—NTNU, Trondheim, Norway
- 2 Department of Geoscience and Petroleum—NTNU, Trondheim, Norway
- 3 Department of Geoscience and Petroleum—NTNU, Trondheim, Norway
Abstract
This work is a thermo-fluid numerical case study to investigate the size and performance of a system that eliminates needs for insulating, heating and inhibiting chemically the deposition of wax in subsea tie-in flowlines. For short, we call this type of systems “Cold Flow”. The particular system analyzed in this study consists of a reactor unit at the inlet to the flowline, where the thermal solubility of the wax-creating molecules is reduced by cooling. Subsequently, solid wax is deposited in the reactor piping and wax free crude is entering the flowline. The reactor is regenerated periodically. The reactor-pipeline system was modelled using a commercial flowline simulator, with transient, thermal, multiphase and deposition capabilities. The basic layout used was a transportation pipeline of 8 km and 6.69 in ID with a mass flow rate of 17.51 kg/s, a water cut (WC) of zero and an inlet temperature of 70 ° C. The wax appearance temperature (cloud point) of the crude is 22 ° C and the seabed temperature is 4 ° C. Three types of reactors have been simulated: a non-insulated pipe section, a passive cooler with a bundle of parallel pipes and an active cooler. Sensitivity analyses have been performed for all three cases varying the external convective coefficient, the reactor pipeline diameter and the WC. For a non-insulated pipeline section cooler, the required length is of the same order of magnitude as the main flowline, implying that such a solution is impractical for short flowline distances or when a compact deployment is desired. For the passive cooler case, the required length was half of that in the previous case ; thus it is still significant. For the active cooler reactor, the required cooling duty was 2.2 MW. In all three cases, the pipe-flow dynamics were analyzed, and the pigging arrangement complexity has been qualitatively addressed. However, the detailed design falls out of the scope of this study.
- Coberly, C. (1942) Method of Preventing Wax Deposits in Tubing. US Patent No. 2303823 A.
- Merino-Garcia, D. and Correra, S. (2008) Cold Flow: A Review of a Technology to Avoid Wax Deposition. Taylor & Francis Group, Ed, 26, 446-459. https://doi.org/10.1080/10916460600809741
- Al-Yaari, M. (2011) Paraffin Wax Deposition: Mitigation & Removal Techniques. SPE Saudi Arabia Section Young Professionals Technical Symposium, Dhahran, 14-16 March 2011, SPE-155412-MS.
- Berson, R.A. (2000) Method for Making Slurry. US Patent No. 6070417 A.
- Fung, G., Amin, R., Fleyfel, F. and O’Sullivan, J. (2003) Method for Reducing Solids Buildup in Hydrocarbon Steams Produced from Wells. US Patent No. 6656366 B1.
- Nenniger, J. (1991) Process for Inhibiting Formation of Wax Deposits. CA Patent No. 1289497 C.
- Knowles, W.T. (1987) Choke Cooling Waxy Oil. US Patent No. 4697426 A.
- Watson, M.J., Speranza, A. and LaCombe, M. (2015) Rigorous Integrated Production Modelling of Cold Flow Technology. Offshore Technology Conference Brazil. Rio de Janeiro, 27-29 Ctober 2015, OTC-26291-MS.
- Larsen, R., Lund, A. and Argo, C.B. (2003) Cold Flow—A Practical Solution. 11th International Conference on Multhiphase Flow “Multiphase 03” BHR Group, San Remo, 11-13 June 2003.
- Gudmundsson, J.S. (2002) Cold Flow Hydrate Technology. 4th International Conference on Gas Hydrates, Yokohama, 19-23 May 2002, 5 p.
- Azarinezhad, R., Chapoy, R., Anderson, R. and Tohidi, B. (2008) HYDRAFLOW: A Multiphase Cold Flow Technology for Offshore Flow Assurance Challenges. 2008 Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, 5-8 May 2008, OTC-19485-MS. https://doi.org/10.4043/19485-MS
- Akpabio, M.G. (2013) Cold Flow in Long Distance Subsea Pipelines. Master Thesis, NTNU, Trondheim.
- Vinatovskaja, E. (2015) Cold Flow in the Arctic: A Feasibility Study. Master Thesis, University of Stavanger, Stavanger.
- Kondapi, P. and Moe, R. (2013) Today’s Top 30 Flow Assurance Technologies: Where Do They Stand? Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, 6-9 May 2013, OTC-24250-MS.
- Olga (2012) User Manual.
- Rosvol, K. (2008) Wax Deposition Model. Master Thesis, NTNU, Trondheim.
- Burger, E.D., Perkins, T.K. and Striegler, J.H. (1981) Studies of Wax Deposition in the Trans Alaska Pipeline. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 33, 1075-1086. https://doi.org/10.2118/8788-PA