Effects of Anthropometry Variations on Physiological Parameters of Heart Rate, Oxygen Consumption, Aerobic Power While Performing Manual Operation at Fixed Vice Height
- 1 Department of Industrial and Production Engineering, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
- 2 Department of Agricultural and Bio-Environmental Engineering, Federal College of Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria
- 3 Department of General Studies, Federal College of Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria
Abstract
This study investigated the effect of fixed height standing-workstation on different people with diverse anthropometry dimensions. Measurements of some anthropometric and physiological parameters are carried out as bases for the calculation of body mass index (BMI) and the determination of the maximum heart rate (HR max ) and aerobic power (VO 2 max) of individual subject while performing manual cutting operation with hacksaw on fixed vice height of 940 mm. Twenty subjects (S1 to S20) parted 2 mm thick square-pipe of 25 mm × 25 mm. Each subject carried out cutting operation in 5 replicates and their physiological parameters during activities are measured to determine their expended energy (EE) and oxygen consumption rate (VO 2 ). The results showed that subject S4 with BMI of 20.76 kg/m 2 has maximum cutting rate of 5.33 stroke/s, while subject S8 with BMI of 23.39 kg/m 2 has minimum cutting rate of 0.92 stroke/s. There was a statistically significant effect on the interaction between BMI, EE and Cutting rate, with F = 827.54, P = 0.000, R 2 = 0.967 and S = 1.749 units. Subject S11 was discovered to have VO 2 (28.54 l/min) and VO 2 max (24.36 ml/min/kg), with highest value of EE (2.94 kcal/min). Wear rates of 1.86 teeth/s and 9.55 teeth/s have the same energy cost (EE = 0.87 kcal/min) but different cutting time of 36.65 s (S18) and 10.89 s (S20) respectively. This could explain in-part that excess 25.76 s utilized in operation time by subject S18 is responsible for keeping approximately 7.7 teeth intact as regards tool management. EE and Tool Wear Rate in one-way analysis of variance, were statistically significant (F = 45.87, P = 0.000, R 2 = 54.69% and S = 1.617 units) at 0.05 level.
- Kong, Y.K., Lowe, B.D., Lee, S.J. and Krieg, E.F. (2008) Evaluation of Handle Shapes for Screwdriving. Applied Ergonomics, 39, 191-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2007.05.003
- Byungjoon, B.J.K. (2012) Effect of Ergonomic Design Changes in Hand Tools on Physiological Cost and Subjective Ratings. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 18, 267-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2012.11076932
- Vyavahare, R.T. and Kallurkar, S.P. (2012) Anthropometric and Strength Data of Indian Agricultural Workers for Equipment Design: A Review. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal, 14, 102-114. http://www.cigrjournal.org
- George, S. (2010) Cutting Tool Applications: Saws & Sawing. American Machinist, Machining/Cutting.
- Liang, M., Wei, Z., Damien, C., Fouad, B., François, G.M.L., Zhang, W., Bennis, F., Chablat, D. and Guillaume, F. (2009) Multi-Objective Optimisation Method for Posture Prediction and Analysis with Consideration of Fatigue Effect and Its Application Case. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 57, 1235-1246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2009.06.003
- Arvidsson, I., Akesson, I. and Hansson, G.A. (2003) Wrist Movements among Females in a Repetitive, Non-Forceful Work. Applied Ergonomics, 34, 309-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(03)00042-5
- Bisht, D.S. and Khan, M.R. (2013) Ergonomic Assessment Methods for the Evaluation of Hand Held Industrial Products: A Review. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, London, 3-5 July 2013, Vol. 1.
- Aghazadeh, F. and Mital, A. (1987) Injuries Due to Hand Tools. Applied Ergonomics, 18, 273-278. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(87)90134-7
- Afolabi, B.O., Adejumo, A.O.D. and Jokanola, O.O. (2015) Comparative Assessment of Two Methods in the Production of Fermented Cassava Flour (Láfún) on Manual Energy Expended Retting Time and the Product Quality. Food Science and Quality Management, 42, 20-28.
- Tayyari, F. and Smith, J. (2003) Occupational Ergonomics Principles and Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
- Varghese, M.A., Saha, P.N. and Atreya, N. (1994) A Rapid Appraisal of Occupational Workload from a Modified Scale of Perceived Exertion. Ergonomics, 37, 485-491. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139408963665
- Robergs, R.A. and Landwehr, R. (2002) The Surprising History of the “Hr max = 220 − Age” Equation. Journal of Exercise Physiology Online, 5, 1-10.