Design, Thermodynamic Performance Comparison and Cost Analysis of Photovoltaic (PV), Concentrated Solar Power (CSP), Wind Turbine, Natural Gas Combined Cycle (NGCC), and Integrated Solar Combined Cycle (ISCC) Power Plants
- 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado, Denver, USA
- 2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado, Denver, USA
Abstract
This paper evaluates and discusses ways to use five energy resources more efficiently for generating electric power. An analysis of five different 10 MW powerplants was made : a photovoltaic system, a concentrated solar power system, wind turbines, a natural gas combined cycle and an integrated solar combined cycle. Also, each power plant’s operating principle, thermodynamic analysis, economic analysis, and simulation evaluation w ere made using the System Advisor Model (SAM), Engineering Equation Solver (EES), and the Thermoflow Power Plant Simulation program. From the analysis, the power plant capacity factor, grid availability, levelized cost of electricity, and annual energy production are compared and analyzed to determine a suitable power plant for a given location.
- https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/electricity/electricity-in-the-us-generation-capacity-and-sales.php
- https://www.volker-quaschning.de/datserv/CO2-spez/index_e.php
- https://www.euractiv.com/section/energy/opinion/mondaycop22-lower-co2-emissions-with-lower-carbon-solar-energy
- https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/electricity_generation.pdf
- https://www.forbes.com/sites/joshuarhodes/2020/02/03/the-us-solar-industry-in-2020/#2d7b17d85ed3
- http://www.fi-powerweb.com/Renewable-Energy.html
- https://www.seia.org/state-solar-policy/colorado-solar
- https://www.communityenergyinc.com/projects/comanche-solar
- https://www.pv-tech.org/news/sunpowers-50mw-hooper-pv-plant-begins-commercial-operation-in-colorado
- https://www.energysage.com/solar-panels/solar-rebates-incentives/co
- https://www.nexteraenergyresources.com/pdf_redesign/limon.pdf
- https://windexchange.energy.gov/maps-data/15
- https://www.wartsila.com/energy/learn-more/technical-comparisons/combustion-engine-vs-gas-turbine-derating-due-to-ambient-temperature
- https://trepo.tuni.fi/bitstream/handle/123456789/26542/Pacios%20Llorca.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y
- Le-ol, A.K., et al. (2018) Comparative Assessment of Thermal Power Systems Performance under Uncertainty. European Journal of Engineering Research and Science, 3, 52-57. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejers.2018.3.7.710
- Kehlhofer, R. (1999) Combined-Cycle Gas & Steam Turbine Power Plants. PennWell Publishing Co., Tulsa, OK.
- Zhu, G.D., et al. (2015) Thermodynamic Evaluation of Solar Integration into a Natural Gas Combined Cycle Power Plant. Renewable Energy, 74, 815-824.
- Schwarzbozl, P., et al. (2006) Solar Gas Turbine Systems: Design, Cost and Perspectives. Solar Energy, 80, 1231-1240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2005.09.007
- https://news.energysage.com/what-are-the-most-efficient-solar-panels-on-the-market
- Neises, T. and Wagner, M.J. (2013) Simulation of Direct Steam Power Tower Concentrated Solar Plant. 6th International Conference on Energy Sustainability Collocated with the ASME 2012 10th International Conference on Fuel Cell Science, Engineering and Technology, San Diego, 23-26 July 2012, 499-507. https://doi.org/10.1115/ES2012-91364